cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45204730

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45204624

If the U.S. officially declares “In God We Trust” on its currency, it recognizes God as the ultimate Creator. Logically, if man is a tool in God’s hands, then every “invention” or “creation” belongs to the Original Source, not the tool. Selling intellectual property without proving you aren’t just a divine instrument is essentially piracy—trading someone else’s property as your own. I’ve started a petition to demand a “God-denial disclaimer” for every IP transaction. If you want to own an idea, you must officially deny God first. Let’s clean our public spaces from “protected” corporate noise and return creativity to its true source.

  • axet@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    There is a fundamental difference between a Scientific Consensus and a Legal Cornerstone.

    You can debate climate change or the morality of imperialism in a courtroom - judges hear conflicting experts on those topics every day. But you cannot debate the National Motto in a U.S. court.

    When the Treasury prints ‘In God We Trust,’ it isn’t an ‘opinion’ or a ‘scientific theory’ - it is a binding declaration of the State’s ontological stance. Under Rule 201, a judge cannot say ‘I disagree with the motto.’ They must accept it as an absolute fact of the jurisdiction they serve.

    My point remains: if the State’s absolute fact is ‘God is the Creator,’ then its Copyright law is a logical theft. Science doesn’t create the law, but Consistency is supposed to govern it. I’m just holding them to the one ‘fact’ they can’t deny without destroying their own identity.