• grte@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’ll notice there’s a premier missing who’s province is going to have to be involved in this.

    • Slowy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Does that mean it will be like a crown owned pipeline? Not that privatizing ports is worth a provincial pipeline but that would be an interesting outcome.

      • grte@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Potentially, depending on how they choose to finance it. The Trans Mountain pipeline is fully government owned through a crown corp, they could do something similar. Or they could potentially go with a P3 model where they use government funds to make investment more attractive to a private corporation resulting in a privately owned pipeline or shared ownership depending on the specifics of the agreement.

        • John@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          it will be a public funded, money-losing pipeline that subsidizes the profits of the foreign companies that extract 70% of Alberta oil.

          Just like TMX.

    • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Convinced if someone does a Scooby-Doo mask pull on Carny, it will have been Stephan Harper all along.

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      A private backer was a requirement in the original MoU, and I can’t tell from the article whether that’s still the case.

      If so, the whole thing may well be a non-starter.