This short video suggests that reality might not exist independently, but could depend on the observer.
It even claims this idea might help unify relativity and quantum mechanics.
Not sure if it’s true, but I found it mildly interesting.
This short video suggests that reality might not exist independently, but could depend on the observer.
It even claims this idea might help unify relativity and quantum mechanics.
Not sure if it’s true, but I found it mildly interesting.
3d old account. Vague synopsis. Waffling about truthiness. Sketchy link that doesn’t go to a well-known video site.
@okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
Does how new an account is really have anything to do with the content? This video is based on an actual paper. I think you can judge it properly if you read it.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403024962
Pretty sure this paper is 100% bullshit and this is crackpot territory.
Author starts with a ton of assertions, none of them cited. Invents new nomenclature without proper definition. Takes two completely different kinds of measurements (an EEG connected to a human, the author presumably, and a quantum chip probably something stupid in AWS), doesn’t explain the setup of those measurements or the methodology, calls them ricci curvature dynamics which is nonsense as far as I can tell. Then goes about finding patterns in the noise between these two systems and makes wild leaps of the imagination that this shit is actually correlated.
Did you read the paper? Can you explain it? Because I actually did read this trash. I am gonna guess that you just watched the shitty vid and didn’t actually read the paper or apply any critical thinking here.