BlueberryAlice
- 7 Posts
- 13 Comments
0·11 days agoI just thought it was an interesting idea worth sharing. It’s not my own theory.
I was here about 5 days ago, so I might not be the same person.
What do you mean by ‘your video’?
0·11 days agoYeah, I know. I just want to hear different perspectives.
It’s not really solipsism—it’s an observational model grounded in actual experimental data. At the very least, it’s not just some random idea.
Does how new an account is really have anything to do with the content? This video is based on an actual paper. I think you can judge it properly if you read it.
Thank you for your interest.
There is actually a paper that this work is based on. It is available on ResearchGate and Academia.
I’ll share the link, so if you’re interested, I would appreciate it if you could take a look.
I would also be very interested to hear your thoughts.
0·11 days agoAre you saying it’s just a comic? What it’s saying is actually quite different. Rather than “observation determines it,” it seems to treat observation itself as the process through which the state is generated.
0·14 days agoYour point seems to be missing the actual subject of discussion.
What I am asking for—even if you disagree—is a rebuttal based on scientific reasoning and evidence regarding the content itself.
That is the minimum level of respect owed when an author presents a theory derived from experimental data.
As it stands, it looks like you’re unable to provide a convincing counterargument to the actual content, so instead you’re focusing on superficial points that are easy to attack just to pass the time.
I think that perspective—that it makes sense as metaphysics—is certainly understandable.
However, this research does not remain within that framework. It is constructed within the framework of physics, as it formulates hypotheses based on experimental data and further validates them through reproducible experiments.
If you’re interested, I’ve shared the original paper below. I would really appreciate it if you could take a look at the actual data and structure, and share your honest thoughts.
@farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works
“The hypothesis in this video is derived from experimental data presented in the original paper. If you’d like, I can share it with you—I’d appreciate hearing your thoughts after you’ve had a chance to read it.
0·14 days agoThanks for your comment. The content is based on the original paper, not the LLM itself. Here is the source:
@der_biElEr@discuss.tchncs.de
No worries, it happens a lot 🙂 What do you think about the idea?