• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    How many of those art degree holders could even design such a knocker today? This is way different from just producing Rorschach images or clumping-together-random-stuff “sculptures”.

  • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Zbrush and a 3d printer could fix that. But you would need something heavy on the ring bottom to knock properly.
    Or add a sensor to detect movement and inform your homeassistant.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They want the AI to create the left one, then blame artists for the right one.

    The reason behind the change is industrialization. The right one is just a regular handle with wider appeal, the left one needs more specialized equipment and is only applicable to people wanting that style of handle, not a handle of function.

  • TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would be shocked if simple door knockers weren’t common side-by-side with the ornate door knockers throughout history. But being simpler and of a lower quality, they would neither be as notable nor endure until today.

  • kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, art is better these days.

    Like for hundreds of years shit like this was peak

    “We can only draw 2D from the side”, like a third grader. People had to invent persepctive some thousand years later. Come on, just draw what you see, how hard can it be? Or did everybody just walk like Mario all the time and that is just what artists were seeing? I mean, Egypt is like a 2D country along the Nile, so maybe they just didn’t know any better. Being ancient Egyptian meant being constantly trapped in a scroll platformer.

    SMH.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      No that’s the industrial designer who only gets a budget to make it functional and mass producible.

            • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              No, the dominant factor in the world is profitability. It doesn’t matter what the demand for beautiful things is, the things that are the most profitable that most people will buy will dominate. Lowest common denominator type stuff.

              Artful things cost more to produce than simple geometric shapes. So, in order for the artful things to have the same profitability as the simple things, they have to cost more money. Costing more means that less people will buy it, so it actually needs to cost even more to remain competitive. Bish bash bosh, beautiful becomes synonymous with wealth and then it needs to compete with the trendy expensive things that the wealthy buy. If this is how the world works, then you’d expect things like this to be common among the wealthy in times of it being a trend. Otherwise, you’d expect it to be niche or old.

              (Looks out at the world) Yep, elaborate knockers are out of fashion, and all of the rest are niche or old. Interesting, that.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    That knocker is almost perfect

    There just needs to be an even tinnier knocker in the tiny demon’s mouth

  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I hate that minimalist designs aren’t acknowledged as artistic.

    In my opinion, it is no different than the ai idiots who think all art needs to be hyperrealistic; That good art is hyperrealistic.

    • esc@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      When you alnost can’t have anything but ‘minimalism’ (not sure if most of the things that you can get count as minimalist and not just extremely utilitarian) it kind of destroys the feeling.

      • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Idk, I am not an artist or anything. I just look at stuff and like different things in different moments and settings, like everyone else.

        I am just sick of the disrespect for art in general. I am not a good critic but I am good enough to acknowledge that art is not only made for me and my taste.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        (not sure if most of the things that you can get count as minimalist and not just extremely utilitarian)

        Definitely utilitarian. Stuff that’s actually minimalist requires thoughtful design and precision construction and is therefore actually pretty fucking expensive.