“You win wars, friends, and companionship with ideas and attitudes, not solely actions”

The person who wrote that fancies themselves someone who can manipulate circumstances to their favor through means other than action, such as through social manipulation or persuasion, not realizing that sometimes conditions require changing hearts and minds and sometimes conditions require putting your body on the line.

It means this person is outrageously pretentious and also not great at written English.

If you try to unpack this word salad, basically this person is of the opinion that you should protest dirty and smart (I get some hard lefty, “mop” kind of vibes), as opposed to just showing up in huge numbers once in awhile not getting anything done. This person then makes an offhand assertion that the system is rigged against this kind of protest in some double standard way. It seems like they think this is not effective, and also that the people that rise to the top in these situations are not the kind of people you probably want in leadership.

It is not well written at all, so that’s what I got from reading it twice and writing this up from memory (Voyager doesnt let me look at the thing while I write a comment) and that’s as much effort as I have to give it.