Late Tuesday afternoon, with the subtlety of a wrecking ball and the morality of a foreclosure notice, the Trump administration announced the most devastating attack on the U.S. Forest Service in the agency’s 121-year history. Not a budget cut. Not a policy shift. Not a “reorganization.” An execution.

They’re ripping the headquarters out of Washington and shipping it to Salt Lake City, Utah — the beating heart of the anti-public-lands movement in America. They’re shuttering every single one of the ten regional offices that have governed this agency since Gifford Pinchot built the system over a century ago — and with them, the career professionals who spent entire lifetimes earning the expertise and the authority to push back when politicians came calling with bad ideas and worse motives. They’re destroying more than fifty research facilities across thirty-one states, labs that house decades of irreplaceable long-term science, the kind you literally cannot restart once it’s gone. And they’re replacing all of it — the offices, the scientists, the institutional knowledge, the professional independence — with fifteen political appointees called “state directors,” embedded in state capitals alongside the very governors, legislators, and industry lobbyists who have spent their careers demanding that the Forest Service log more, protect less, and get out of the way.

    • in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Um, technically, this is what they not voted for. Also, with the electoral college most who “protest voted” lived in heavy blue areas. The election went for the republicans because Kamala refused to distance herself from Joe Biden and also massive campaigns of vote suppression.

      But yeah, argue with other leftists, it’s not like a fragmented left is the reason fascists keep winning or anything.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They aren’t leftists. -They’re advocating for the old neoliberal candidate which was/is center-right

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also sounds like you’re looking to blame. I am looking to inform protest-non-voters what they voted for. And yes this is what they voted for.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Think there’s just more non-voters than this mythical “protest voter” everyone keeps talking about. How about we focus on mandatory voting laws and anti-gerrymandering instead of falling for psyops talking points?

      You’re really telling me 89 million people “protested” by staying at home, when Kamala lost by 0.96% of the eligible voting population? Or did these people just not care to even show up no matter what?

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sounds like you’re looking to find who’s responsible. I’m interested in informing protest-non-voters what they voted for.

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s nice, but that doesn’t help us prevent our current predicament, or stop the alienation of disenfranchised voters in the future. Hispanics by and large also voted for Trump, and those were not “protest votes”. That does not mean they deserve the inhumane treatment ICE is perpetuating towards them.

          There are 89 million untapped voters, Democrats should be salivating over that. Instead they are pairing with the Cheneys and moving farther right.

          Harris broke fundraising records with her candidacy with 64% of those donations being first time donors. They actually could have had the momentum to mobilize non-voters. Instead they capitulated to corporate interests as usual.

          Again, the problem isn’t “protest voters”, they are such a small percentage. People focusing on this are ignoring a lot of other factors, and honestly it seems like another way to scapegoat a DNC systemic problem.

        • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.comdeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Perpetuating a cycle of weak, corporate candidates that just allowed the Republicans to get stronger and stronger? Yeah mate, you did.

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lol funny how you try to turn voting into not voting, and not voting into … something else. Anyways, see article and remember, this is what you voted for protest-non-voters. Ciao.