• N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yes, total strangers. Her husband didn’t even know the guy, despite him attending Trump’s 1993 wedding to Marla Maples and having been regularly photographed and videoed hanging out with the guy. To quote her husband:

    “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Oh shit, all the times I’ve seen that photo and never noticed that detail…

      • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        This might be the highest quality version I’ve seen

        Look at Melania’s pupils… Holy shit she’s high AF. You’d have to be to marry the dildo juggler (Google djt “dancing.”)

  • DarthPub@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    If only there were documents that could provide context for the connection Epstein had to the trump family. Too bad the government doesn’t have access to millions of documents that could shed light on the relationships Epstein had.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    You get invited to a party, people have cameras, they ask you to put your arm around the waist of a complete stranger, it happens. Was I supposed to say “no”? That would be rude.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    At this point, the most Melania can claim is plausible deniability, very light on the plausible. If she wants her words to mean something, there is a way. All she has to do is testify under oath to the congressional committees investigating the Epstein files.

    It’s strange that she’s so desperate to put this to bed that she’s willing to randomly call a press conference, and in her press conference, she extolled how necessary it is for all of Epstein’s victims to have their testimony recorded for congress, but she’s not willing to testify herself.

    Surely Melania’s testimony would be more relevant than Hillary’s testimony, considering that Hillary truly seemed to have nothing to do with Epstein and said she never even met him.

      • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I block every comm which might post these rapists faces because I am a victim of rape and child abuse. Their faces triggers me. If people are posting them to comms which have rules against it then the entire system breaks down.

        There are specific comms for these posts, so the better question is, why do you post shit in places that have rules against that content?