Helpful tip. Don’t buy trash games that do that.

Yeah I like at least a year, but multi year is ideal

Perhaps has to do with the medium and the tendency of things to decay away. Maybe fluoride is stable in water, but something like Vitamin D would break down. Sunlight for example breaks down some things like that. I imagine water is probably a difficult medium to survive in for a lot of things.

Deranged bestiality magat.

I wonder why we don’t handle it like any other vitamin? Where’s my multivitamin tap water?!

I filter my water, so the fluoride goes to waste sadly. Wonder if it comes in a small dose pill.

I assumed this was more a sloppy jab at discovering your partner was more promiscuous than you envisioned rather than size envy. Not that that would be logically consistent either. All in all, meh tier meme.

Holy shit, did he summon Wing Zero from the anime dimension in the sky above?!

Guess we’ll just die I guess. Shall I start making nooses for us?

This is exactly what Grand Juries are for and why the bar for indictment is so low.

It’s a safeguard to prevent frivolous felony persecution by the State upon individuals.

It is to the Jurors to take one look at the evidence the prosecution presents and to say, nope, this is a BS case.

That’s why it’s so easy to get indictments. Generally, prosecutors only show up with actual evidence of potential wrong doing.

If they show up with nothing, in typical Trump legal team fashion, they will get no indictment.

They seem to think because THEY suck at law, everyone else does too. All competent lawyers left that administration. Believe it or not, plenty of lawyers actually have respect for the institutions they spent their lives training in and working in.

But not really a NEW problem. We knew LLM’s are trained on aggregate human data. We know aggregate human data is fundamentally flawed, inconsistent, unreliable, etc.

Like was there a point at which people just decided, nah AI is just plain accurate? Or is that just what morons always thought despite the permanent warnings plastered everywhere saying THIS AI CAN MAKE MISTAKES, CHECK EVERYTHING!

I don’t see this as a problem, rather, an opportunity to study information & disinformation propogation.

I think a good CEO should strive to understand as much of a business he runs as possible. But the larger the company the more I find that it’s common that the CEO actually is NOT skilled in the fields most integral to the company’s success.

AMD has Lisa Su, but that seems like an exception more than a rule.

Ah… So if I’m reading you right, you’re saying:

Yes, no system currently accounts for what we NEED it to do. So the most DIRECT solution would be to create a new movement, a new SYSTEM of people, control, and influence that transcends existing abstractions like nationalities, race, culture, and have this ontologically encompassing system implement that change from its larger frame of reference.

I like that. I hadn’t considered that approach and it’s probably right on the money. I think the first step is recognition of the issue and the need for such a movement. As such… Have you thought about names?

Something you would call such an endeavor, or movement, or coalition. Something that would be instantly recognizable as to what the goal or at least spirit or attitude behind it would be? Probably seems like a silly thing to fixate on this early, but sometimes the right name is a powerful tool.

Well you got to work ontologically. A nation is a system with existing controls. And national control is already dicey at best. Implementing a direct solution at the international level would require a system that to my knowledge doesn’t even exists. We treat the UN like an optional club not a world government.

He’s a madman with a box! Gotta love him.

I think Miaa is not talking about the literal rights they fought for, but largely a commentary on women collectively valuing financial independence from being a couple over more traditional couple based partnership.

I’ve been watching the argument unfold on the traditionalist side but they aren’t great at articulating what they are trying to say. So it always looks like rage inducing over simplification.

On the female TikTok side of the Internet, there’s a lot of sentiment from women expressing disdain for the idea of going 50-50 with a man, and a lot of preference for men that out earn them. That’s inconsistent from a financial independence mindset.

Then you have the women like Miaa who were like, housewife is easier than ever with the technological innovations you already mentioned. ‘Why not just be a homemaker if guys appreciate that and are willing to take care of you?’

Then the red pill guys are another party in the conversation, and they are saying things like, what women say they want and their actions don’t seem to be aligning and a lot of them are either done dating or at minimum have no intention of long term commitment. "Women say equality but not when the check comes. They want men to be open with their emotions but it gives them ‘the ick’. Men shouldn’t approach women in public because it’s creepy, but now the internet is flooded with women asking where men went and why they are being so effeminate. " That’s the kind of thinking I’m seeing in those circles.

It’s a big mess! Do I have a fix? Nope, just commenting on the forest fire from my vantage point. I’m just thankful I’m not in the dating market.

Hopefully it’s just whining from the vocal minorites that make all this content, and the majority of people are still balanced people that aren’t aspiring content creators and are basically happily living their lives so we don’t hear from them. Please, confirmation bias, be something good for a change. Be the fog obscuring the true good. 🤞

“why would you do that?!”

“… I had a duty of care.”

All of those things are subjective experiences I have not experienced. Because ventilation, cooking frequency, and myriad other factors complicate the experience.

So go ahead and get on your high horse and whine about pedantry.

Period. Exclamation! Question mark?

If you think that air quality is a built in metric to every conversation about cooking, then I think it’s you who has unrealistic expectations.

I mean I have a naturally broader systemic view than most people and I know that just because you haven’t folded the concept of cooking into my view of a Unified Field Theory encompassing all of existence doesn’t make me smart and you dumb.

This was not, and is still is not, common knowledge. We definitely do need to spread the word on that. I only learned this within the last year or two.