“the fact that somewhere else is some nazi moron is also a problem, but it is not a defense for a communism”
These things are in fact not a different problem. When we talk about power structures and state forms and what’s the best way to organize a country, context matters. It matters how those people where killed, it matters how many people in other state forms had to suffer and it matters what are the dynamics behind all of that. Otherwise a statement like that is rather manipulative and not allowing to engage with the ideas of communism and the underlying values.
“well of course we are talking about every attempt at practical realization of communism in human history. no one cares about a fictional dream in a book. fictional dream in a book does not kill people, all the practical attempts at bringing it to life does”
I strongly disagree with this statement. States like communist Russia happens because of the idea in a book but where twisted during there implementation and formed into something else. Therefore stating that communism killed so many people is wrong. The implementation of communism turns out to end up in authoritarian structures like so many revolutions do (example: France after their first revolution).






Fairphone A lot of people want graphene but E/OS is there for the fairphone…
Or any of the other alternative is.
Actually I wonder why the graphene people don’t develop for FP. Seems like a better Plattform than to throw google some money for their pixels