I have never heard of these people before right now, but based on your description it sounds like your question is why would a YouTuber say something hypocritical?
Mostly because:
Don’t give up, kids
That will for sure help with the rise in wildfires.
Bad Zoot
The weird part was that fixing the toilet perfectly synced up with The Wizard of Oz
“I’m really thinking about partnering with them to take some of that money they are never going to give me”
I remember when we used to imagine some future politician leading us over the edge because they are so clever and well spoken.
Do recommend
Justice Neil Gorsuch, who was also appointed by Trump, added to the pressure Sauer faced, asking the seasoned Solicitor General: “Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under your test?”
“Ah, I think… so,” he replied, somewhat unconvincingly. “I’ll have to think that through.”
Is that literally the first time he’s thought about that?
All glory to the Hypnotoad
The question presumes that providing defense for someone that is guilty is more of an ethical problem than prosecuting someone that is innocent.
I believe the opposite. I think even if someone is guilty they deserve a fair defense.
AFAIK there’s not a story to it. It’s just using pollination as a metaphor; and now that I think about it, the flower isn’t even mentioned. Typical.
People claim that more animals are killed in industrial agriculture than the animals that you would be eating instead. Like mice killed by threshers.
The flaw in that argument is that livestock animals are fed by industrial agriculture too, so by eating meat you are also responsible for more animals killed in agriculture than you would be by eating the produce yourself. It takes a lot more agriculture to raise multiple animals for one person to eat than it would to produce the amount of food they would eat otherwise.