• Asonyxi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I will preface this comment by saying I genuinely consider myself to be rather dumb, and slow to learn many things. With that being said, I’ve never had a single issue with the one arch based distro I have used (Cachy). I never had to really look up any docs, but to learn to install some specific programs. Overall it…just kinda worked? Only reason I switched to Fedora was for that extra peace of mind knowing its a bit more stable than rolling release, but still has more updated software than Debian based distros.

    • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      CachyOS are Arch have very different philosophies. On Cachy everything is made to be smooth. Arch is, as the post said, a Tamagotchi. But that is what we like about it : build your own ecosystem

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Cachy is built on top of arch. There’s no fundamental difference between the two

        • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes! Honestly, this argument is so dumb. Is like arguing that a Honda Accord isn’t the same car unless it has a manual transmission.

          Yeah, automatic and manual do drive differently, but it doesn’t stop being the same type of car just because they made shifting easier.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      You can’t compare arch to cachy. They’re completely different experiences with different expectations.