• Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    🫵🤏🤞🤞🤘☝️👍🤌👍🤞🤌🫱🫲🫷👉👐🫶🙌🫶🤛

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    That’s either “sign language doesn’t work with our speech-to-text algorithm and we’ll be throat fucked if we hire an actual person to do a job” or some massively pretentious statement about accessibility in media.

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    For a decade tech has fucked sub’s accessibility. The landscape is a complete mess, simultaneously stuck with tech that is too old and also suffering from awful implementation of new tech (LLMs suck at closed captioning but everyone insist it is the only way to do it now). Yet context reading to know who needs subs when is still so archaic and depends completely on user input. But then, the content is always innadecuate, specially when it’s for the hearing impaired.

    • webhead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah I’ve noticed a lot of llm subs on streaming platforms and I’m like bro wtf the stuff you download is better than this. How can you be the one making the thing and not put accurate fucking subtitles on it. It’s pathetic. I mean are have the llm do the heavy lifting but you’ve still gotta proof it ffs.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Its a bad thing, but it’s less bad than the thing it’s trying to solve. We should look forward to a scenario where DEI is obsolete.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Oh I sure do look forward to the well-reasoned and deeply nuanced explanation you’re certain to get in response to that question.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                It’s civil which was nice, but it’s also an argument that is (charitably) extremely poorly thought through. It’s just an appeal towards free-market regulation, which in an ideal world does work great but we have hundreds of years history (and the fact that I do not have a pet dragon) that establishes this is not an ideal world and it would not in fact work great.

                It’s a good, optimistic, hope-for-the-future thought yes - but they’re using that to justify badmouthing DEI policies which is both incredibly counterproductive and pretty suspect.

                • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  They are not really though, they are still agreeing that it is necessary, just that they wish it wasn’t. Which the people DEI is supposed to support would probably agree to

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Because it only makes sense because employers can’t be trusted to hire equitably. It is a thumb on the scales, and so is an injust act, but is currently necessary due to bad hiring practices.

            Hopefully we can grow out of this and employers will just hire the best people for the job, regardless of personal circumstance.

            • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              You seem to think DEI is when employers have to meet a diversity quota, when in reality, it upholds laws stating employers can’t make any hiring decisions based on race or any other such demographic.

              • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                The D in DEI literally stands for diversity though. But you’re probably right and they are thinking of affirmative action

                • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Diversity, Equality, Inclusion. The acts support diversity by barring exclusion on grounds of demographics and demanding equality by barring the use of demographic information as part of the hiring process. DEI does not define any minimum diversity metrics.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Compared to good writing?

        We aren’t helping anyone by shoehorning random diversity stuff into cheap ass media. Sure we might have 20 out of place same sex relationships but god forbid if they were to touch on difficult topics. The people at the top make wild choices and are then rewarded because is supports the executives ideas about “diversity.” In practice diversity is really just a marketing to make us forget about all the systemic problems in the world.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          In what world are same-sex relationships not a difficult topic, because I would very much like to move there.

        • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Compared to good writing?

          I’m sorry, I missed the part where its a tradeoff.

          Also, what makes a same-sex relationship “out-of-place”? Gay people exist everywhere, my dude.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I am conflicted here. On the one hand, I agree that subtitles would have been nice. On the other hand, I think folks with hearing disabilities get shut out of other content so much that I don’t think this somewhat solitary case makes it good mildly infuriating material. It’s most likely just an oversight. Much less likely a clever scheme to highlight ableism.

    • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I mean, by US law (back when analog TV was standard) all TV broadcasts had to include closed captions on scanline 23(?) for people with hearing disabilities. it was part of the vertical blanking interval so it didn’t interfere with the regularly visible broadcast. It is good to include subtitles for all dialogue, spoken in the local dialect, in a foreign dialect, and even the various sign languages. That’s isn’t to say that yes, I fully agree that differently abled people should be able to take part in the dialog and should have accommodations where needed.

      Semi related, did you know American sign language is closer to French sign language than it is to British sign language?

      • PinkyPeaky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I don’t think they are against it. I think this is just a rather dark humour way to say this is my everyday normatively

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I get your point bit if anyone is trying to draw attention to the plights of deaf people, this is not the way how to do it

          If I want to see this movie, I’ll get very annoyed, turn it off within 5 minutes and I’ll chrcl something else. Where is the attention now?

          • Snoopy@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Than how ? You just discovered it. There are plenty movie with subtitles but at least you get the experience of our daily life in 2 minutes and there is a post about it on Lemmy.

            That’s not the best experience but it worked.

            Most of time we won’t understand when you talk. Few people will do the effort to write on a paper. And there is a lack of subtitle, we are forced to go through various stressful situations.

            So, i love that it show you the other side, that you get this experience once in your life because most of time, people don’t care. They aren’t deaf and ignore it since it don’t concern them. They have no idea how many movies, podcasts, dramas, meetings, appointements, parties, course…are inaccessible to us. They just call, talk and live on.

            Yeah it is a shame, but i hope you will be a little more aware and join us :)

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Then there are the shows too cheap to make real subtitles and instead use auto generated ones that can’t handle accents or names.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    The worst is when you’re watching something with subtitles (in your own language because it’s hard to hear sometimes), then someone on screen speaks a different language with the subtitles hardcoded into the video.

    Great, right?

    Well no, because Amazon’s (or Netflix etc, they all do it) subtitles have a big “[Speaks German]” up the entire time, blocking the hard coded subs entirely so you cannot see what they say without temporarily disabling subs. Like bitch, I KNOW THEY ARE SPEAKING GERMAN, MOVE THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY SO I KNOW WHAT THEY’RE SAYING

    It’s so fucking stupid and infuriating. How have they not addressed this shit?

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah I remember Man in the High Castle was really terrible with subtitles. It didn’t have hard-coded subtitles at all and the programmatic ones didn’t work reliably. So I’d be sitting there and and thinking “ok am I not supposed to know what they’re saying?” After the scene goes on for a while it becomes “yeah I definitely supposed to know what they’re saying well I guess I have to mess with subtitle settings.” Sometimes it wouldn’t work at all and I’d have to open a ticket with Amazon Prime and wait until they got it working.

      So I guess they gave up on fixing subtitles and just baked them in. But still fucked it up anyway. Apparently a company as big as Amazon still can’t do QA on the use case of someone who’s an english speaker just watching on their platform. It’s sad.

    • Doom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I get a special kind of mad when I watch a foreign film in its original language. Turn on that language’s subtitles and the subtitles don’t match what’s being verbally said because apparently the subs have been translated into English then back into the original language so nothing matches and everything sucks. Or worse when they’ve translated some idiom for American audiences and have translated that idiom back so what’s being said makes zero sense.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Whenever I watch anything in Japanese with my boyfriend, we put on English subtitles for him. Meanwhile, I spend most of the time screaming internally “THAT IS NOT WHAT THEY SAID. THIS IS NOT WHAT ANYONE IS SAYING!?!” instead of actually enjoying the show.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        “cannot obscure important information”

        The FCC is American though. Anything in a “foreign language” is clearly not important information to them.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        The FCC regulates closed captions on over the air broadcast television.

        They’re not going to regulate the Internet streaming services.

    • yuknowhokat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sometimes for fun I’ll watch it foreign language movie I’ll turn on English dubbing and run subtitles as well. It’s really hilarious how different the two will be

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Oh I hate that. Netflix animes are super bad about it. I wish they’d have the subbed English dub as well instead of a translated sub.

    • Aneb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It happens on Jellyfin too but probably because the subs and videos are pulled from the same source

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      The only time a “[speaks German]” type of subs is acceptable is when the audience is not supposed to understand what’s being said. Obscuring the hardcoded subs with that bullshit is absolutely infuriating.

  • Rug_Pisser@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Sometimes, and specifically on Amazon prime, if a show / movie has hard coded subs (for sign or other foreign languages) you will need to turn off the optional subtitle setting.

    Of course then, when someone does speak out loud you won’t get your normal subs until you turn the setting back on. I used to put in a new complaint for each show that it happened on until i canned prime altogether and went back to pirating all their content.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Its really weird that they do that. Like I would have assumed that the hardcoded subs were part of the video.

    • Carighan Maconar@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Germany adds the funky police that sometimes only German subtitles are allowed no matter the audio language you pick. So if there are no German-language subtitles because none were ever made, well you’re shit out of luck now, fuck you and your subtitle needs! 😐