return2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoStudy reveals halving human population gradually could help Earthwww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square119linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkStudy reveals halving human population gradually could help Earthwww.independent.co.ukreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square119linkfedilink
minus-squareSaorSaol@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoFunny how they leave out that taking just 1% of the wealthiest for a nice dirt nap would help more
minus-squareSaorSaol@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoRichest one percent are responsible for same level of climate warming as the 5 billion poorest people so yeah it would.
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoRight, but we’re not talking about the poorest half here. Population is declining in Japan, Korea, Europe and North America. That’s not the poorest half by a long shot.
minus-squareMrMakabar@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThe article suggest halving the global population by 2200. So not some nuclear war or disease killing half of humans basically over night. So more Japan and less nuclear war.
minus-squareTollana1234567@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agojapanese made several series, scenarios over overpopulation. blue gender, evangelion,etc.
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThey don’t use nearly as much ressources as half the population. Come on now.
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI’m not defending them. They are horrible and should be guillotined. But it’s disingenuous to think that reducing our population by half wouldn’t have a greater impact. Feel free to provide sources to prove me wrong.
Funny how they leave out that taking just 1% of the wealthiest for a nice dirt nap would help more
It wouldn’t though.
Richest one percent are responsible for same level of climate warming as the 5 billion poorest people so yeah it would.
Right, but we’re not talking about the poorest half here.
Population is declining in Japan, Korea, Europe and North America. That’s not the poorest half by a long shot.
The article suggest halving the global population by 2200. So not some nuclear war or disease killing half of humans basically over night. So more Japan and less nuclear war.
japanese made several series, scenarios over overpopulation. blue gender, evangelion,etc.
Removed by mod
They don’t use nearly as much ressources as half the population. Come on now.
Removed by mod
I’m not defending them. They are horrible and should be guillotined.
But it’s disingenuous to think that reducing our population by half wouldn’t have a greater impact.
Feel free to provide sources to prove me wrong.