• jhdeval@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I know the advantage of nixos is super easy deployment but for a single desktop what advantage does it offer? I am an atomic fedora user myself.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Free as in freedom. One of the last living things from the hippie movement, by the people, for the people. No governments required.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      eeehhh some of the largest contributors are sponsored by mega corps and governments, but yeah the leading ethos is FOSS

  • neatchee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I know this is a Linux community and therefore we love to hate on Windows…

    but for anyone that hasn’t used Windows in a while, they actually finally implemented relatively decent package manager in the form of “winget”. When you add the wonderful UniGetUI on top of it you get a pretty good experience.

    It had issues early on with consistency but the last ~year or two has seen it get a ton of improvement. It’s much more reliable than it used to be.

    Obviously “it’s about goddamn time” and it doesn’t hold a candle to mature package manager like what’s available on Linux.

    But if you’ve not experienced it before, and are forced to use Windows sometimes, it’s worth checking out.

    • jbunnie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Winget is really not that good. It’s better than nothing, but scoop is much better and deals with autoupdating better.

    • jhdeval@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I have a windows 10 install next to my Linux and I have to agree updates are awful. It might be windows 10 but 3 restarts for an update and the system runs like crap until the update installs. I removed a windows 11 install a while ago because I only used it to play 2 games and it might sit dormant for a few days or longer and when I got back into windows it was unusable until the updates finished. I am running 64GB of ddr4 and a 16 core amd ryzen 9 with a 16GB 9070xt. Hardware is not the issue in my opinion.

      • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Updates are painful on modern Windows, to me it feels like they haven’t overhauled the updating system since the Windows 7 days.

        It’s ridiculous that you have to restart just to update .NET and they take way too long. The major update from the last patchday took 20 minutes on my Ryzen 7 with 64GB RAM and gigabit internet - from downloading to installing and then doing three reboots.

        Fedora on the other hand recently had 153 updates for me and the whole process was done in 3 minutes, with only one reboot.

  • Coki91@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I unironically pacman -Syu’d today and it broke 3 applications that depended on ffmpeg (yes it did update ffmpeg correctly) all from official repos

    Tried to build them all from source for like an hour but the compilation also fails, ended up symlinking the libavcodec.so into it’s previous’ version name and everything works again with zero issues (who designed this shit?)

    • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Add a pacman hook to create a btrfs snapshot before ever update, if anything stupid breaks, rollback to the snapshot and wait a week for it to get fixed before trying again.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    its one of the few things that has consistently gotten better so far

    You forget that enshittification follows popularity and market share.

    Which means that as linux gets more used, and more popular, the chance for its enshitification will increase exponentially.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Classic enshittification of the kernel is kinda impossible while the Benevolent Dictator is around. And as for userland, we’ve already gone through many different enshittification attempts… Red Hat/CentOS, Poetterware, Snaps, etc… and we still survive.

      Other than burnout and such, it’s very hard to kill free software that’s actively used by a lot of different enthusiasts.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Enshittification is a function of capitalism, not popularity. Unless every Linux distro gets paywalled, there is no profit incentive that would drive Linux to enshittification. The kinds of people who currently work on it for no pay will continue to work on it.

        • Aeder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          This only applies when you are talking about comparable things (E.g. two pieces of for-profit software that do the same thing). If they don’t seem to be the same thing, then you actually have to explain how would it happen if you want to be taken seriously.

          Specially when we have examples of companies trying to tighten control over GPL software immediately getting forked and having to backtrack

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think this is where Linux shines.

      You already CAN find enshittification versions of Linux.

      And you can find lightweight ones, security ones, ones for servers, one that’s very user friendly, etc.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I wager that’ll end up dying off too.

        As linux gets more popular, more laypeople are gonna be involved in its use. more laypeople means more issues solved and found, more support needed, more time and attention required, and thanks to everyone using discord any kind of easy to find alternative support is non-existent to any and all search engines, so all that supports gonna fall back on the distro creators and individual devs… and you will see consolidation of teams and packs just to handle the enormous and ever growing load, until you eventually end up with…maybe, generously, 1-3 packs that basically become a cartel.

        and, with those 1-3 packs holding the bulk of users, they’ll eventually start dictating what others can and can not do, to stay in step with them and their services. Which will see more packs falling in line with dictates or just evaporating for refusing to play the game, and thus enshitification.

        and pretending it cant happen will just blindly accelerate it happening.

        because this is how things always go.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I do believe it’s not just one of the things to keep getting better, it’s a blueprint for the things we want to build in the future. From software to society. More individual participation, less corporate involvement, zero corporate ownership of essentials.

    My current enemy is the stranglehold of corporate OSs in the mobile space. That really really needs to go for good.

    • Sʏʟᴇɴᴄᴇ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I agree, however, rather than individual participation, I would say Linux represents a victory for the collective spirit. Yes Linus has spearheaded the kernal development for years, but without all the other contributors sacrificing countless hours, Linux wouldn’t be nearly as successful (and ubiquitous) as it is. Linux demonstrates that we, as a community, can come together to work towards something we know is good and right, without the drive of monetary gain or social recognition, but just because it’s fun, or fills a need, or helps us learn.

      That’s one of the biggest reasons I think Linux is so evangelised on Lemmy specifically: because it epitomises the power of collective altruism in a world increasingly dominated by corporate greed.

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Couldn’t have said it better.

      On mobile we got the different Linux Phone OSes, unfortunately none of them come pre-installed (not counting the obsolete phones from Pine or Librem) and they’re still very much beta software. But they too get consistently better, both Plasma Mobile and Phosh make great strides.

      • ivan@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        There are more recent devices from Jolla, Finnish company. The only problem is the price, roughly the same as basic iPhone 17 (≈700€).

        • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I think we need to collectively understand that freedom and privacy have a cost. That $200 phone is subsidized with the spyware baked into it and the expected income of future repairs and upgrades, ad sales, etc. a $2k phone made with modular parts and software based on open source has a much higher up-front cost, won’t be quite as sleek, will require some technical understanding, but a much lower maintenance cost.

          Game consoles, phones, computers, cars and even refrigerators. If some company now considers the product a loss-leader, we should collectively shun it.

          It’s a hard sell, though, when everything is super expensive and things like phones and cars are pretty much requirements for living in some places.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            It’s also slightly cheaper (per unit) to manufacture a million phones vs ten thousand.

          • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            And even worse when you are poor or simply cannot pay.

            We really need to find the square of the circle on this, where we can have total freedom, low cost, high modularity and grassroots origin.

            I think that an progressivist approach would be the correct (basically, not static prices, but dynamical prices: you’re rich? Then you pay more; you’re poor? Then you pay less or don’t pay at all. The ones in the top do subsidize the ones on the bottom). But of course, that’s hard asf to do.

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I thought we were talking about open phones. Sailfish OS is not fully open, and I see no reason to go from “open but Corpotrash” to “partially closed with a little bit less (?) Corpotrash”.

          Until they finally Open-Source their libraries Jolla is just one among many.

          • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’m an open source zealot as much as the next but I don’t get this view honestly.

            Sailfish is about the best you can get that’s not based on one of the two main OSs. Normal people could use it and it’s got the best shot to make inroads. Even if it’s just a foothold til postmarket or something else comes along I find that huge.

            • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              I’m simply not seeing the benefit over a well maintained degoogled Android ROM such as Graphene or /e/OS. The amount of work I have to out in to relearn stuff is next to none, support is higher and you know hardware support lasts long (thinking of e.g. the Murena Fairphone 6). Sailfish looks like just another corporation with partially closed Source and bumpy track record, and with hardware such as Fairphone (and many other phones) you at least got some digital mobility to move to something else if your distribution of choice goes down the drain.

              I get that having a third option is always better even if all three are questionable, but I don’t see that in Sailfish either.

      • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Fairphones don’t come with Linux pre-installed (I think you can pick LineageOS or /e/OS iirc), but they all support Linux and the past couple models of them are basically just regular smartphones specs-wise. Probably gonna upgrade to one of those when my GrapheneOS Pixel 8 dies.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I recently set up a local Flatpak cache on my home server, very much recommended if you have more than one Linux install with Flatpak in your household. Was pretty easy, too.

  • heliotrope@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago
    emerge -auDN @world
    

    Also:

    gr ~/.src   # (script I wrote myself to update code repos)
    cd ~/.src/repo
    make -j8
    doas make install