• FosterMolasses@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t know if it’s the headcanon I’m reading the nordic chad voices in but I laugh literally everytime I open this image lol

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    IT professional here with 20+ years work experience. Not once have I ever met another tech that liked Apple. Personally, I despise them. Unintuitive locked down garbage that can’t do anything a PC can’t do for half the price. And yes, I have seen viruses on Macs.

    They’re just really good at advertising to people who don’t understand technology.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Unintuitive locked down garbage that can’t do anything a PC can’t do for half the price.

      From the user perspective, enterprise managed Windows is locked down, too, and somehow less reliable.

      Most of the software engineers I know in FAANG and similar tier companies use Macbooks to program. Poke around a coffee shop in the bay area during a weekday and look around.

      And personally, I switched to Mac about 15 years ago mainly because dependency management and the shell made more sense to me coming from Linux. Windows has always been trash, and most other non-Apple OEMs make the actual physical laptop experience worse (hinges, behavior on closing the lid, trackpad behavior and size, power management, display quality in both brightness and pixel density, webcam/audio behavior).

    • quips@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Maybe 10-20 years ago. Today macs are great machines, especially for the price.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The main thing Apple has going for them is their UI/UX is great for the average person, and all of their products just work with each other.

      But yeah, from a sysadmin point of view it’s garbage.

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Linux experience :
    I want to delete my entire filesystem
    Sure thing! It’ll be gone by the time you reboot

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    By default windows does block unverified binaries. It’s pretty annoying. You have to click more info and then run anyway:

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This meme might be referring to the RedSun zero-day, currently unpatched in Win10 & Win11, where detected malicious SW gets installed to the system folder for you by defender.

  • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The macOS Gatekeeper quarantine is stupid, and Windows loves detecting random files as malware and deleting them while you’re using them and not restoring them even after you tell it to allow the “threat”.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Though I do wonder how much of that “detects random files as malware” is actually detecting real malware hidden inside software that also does what it claims to do. Like “this removes game’s DRM and also installs a helpful little rootkit for if we need to help you debug something, DDOS websites we hate, or act as an annonymous proxy”.

      • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Windows does it to apps and files from people I trust or to ones I’ve created myself. I’ve even caught it basing detection on fuzzy string matching and nothing else (Bifrost vs Bifrose in the app name and that’s it).

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah, that’s the frustrating part, it could be either way. Could be based on a heuristic analysis that recognized a pattern associated with malware (that may be based on the malicious parts of the code or maybe some big data algorithm associated otherwise innocent code with the malicious software and flags anything with similar code), maybe it’s just some string match (ie a bad attempt but maybe in good faith), or maybe they are using the malicious code removal tool to also targer code that the user wants but MS considers malicious to their desire to make money.

          Iirc, it’ll say what it matches it to but from what I remember, the actual details remain vague. Like it seems to be at a “report information that sounds useful to managers” level rather than a “report useful technical information for engineers who want to understand what’s happening at a low level”. So you get malware name but nothing about what that malware does or how this current flag associated it with that.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve never used a Mac, can you not just write your own app and run it?

    I do that on windows all the time.

    • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Apple blocks even apps that they define as “too old”.

      Like every new version of Macintosh forces every developer to scramble and update their app even though nothing needs to change just so Apple doesn’t block them.

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That’s fucked. Normally I can coax just about any windows app to run on even windows 11, and I have to because sometimes I interact with ancient industrial machines with monolithic Configurator apps that need a serial connection and a bunch of weird custom commands that was last used in 1998. I’d be boned without them.

        • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Afaik, Microsoft made it a core principle to not break backward compatibility. Something that mattered to a lot of enterprise users. Applications made in Windows XP era, still work today on Win 11.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 hours ago

              It used to be a source of annoyance. So many programs relied on undocumented behavior that MS couldn’t go back and change decisions they made that turned out to be bad ones without potentially breaking things for some programs, even if that decision should have been entirely transparent to end users. So there was a bunch of technical debt being carried in the OS itself, at least until they started adding compatibility layers that allowed the quirks to be moved to there and the OS itself to progress.

              But then they started with the enshittification that made those technical debt days look so innocent in comparison. It was a time when MS cared about the quality of its products.

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You can run what ever you want, it doesn’t stop you outright, it just asks you a bunch of times and makes you jump through some hoops if the program isn’t from a verified source. It’s annoying for someone who knows what they’re doing, but arguably a good backstop to keep someone clueless from running something hostile. It’s a complicated enough process that someone who doesn’t know what they’re doing won’t be able to run it.

      Arguably it’s overkill and them trying to force users to stay in their closed “verified” garden, but it’s not totally unjustified.

      • mimavox@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        For now, that is. Thing is that MacOS is on a trajectory where it becomes more and more locked down.

      • Bababasti@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Pfff get outta here with your differentiated opinions, weighing pros and cons and all that mumbo jumbo. macOS bad!!11

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can tell this meme is old because windows does the same shit MacOS does now and has been since at least Windows 10

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah I use both pretty regularly and I’m fairly sure macOS still makes you do the “nope sorry, press ok, go into system settings, security panel, become admin and click trust this unknown publisher” thing

      Windows still just does the same safescreen thing they’ve been doing for ages now: “windows stopped this unknown thing from running, wanna run it anyway?”

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s extra fun when you’ve inserted a 30 year old install CD and Defender gets all up in arms because the developer/distributor dared to not register their signing key with Windows defender in 1998

      • freely1333@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Actually worse - you don’t do it in the system settings anymore. You have to run a terminal command to dequarantine it. On windows you just have to click see more and accept the risk (or similar). Mac made it way more painful with no prompt to even show you how to do it - and it sort of acts like the app is broken rather than telling you it’s even a security protection.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Can I get a source for that? Because I daily drive MacOS, am on the latest version, and it absolutely doesn’t behave like that for me

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The de-quarantine thing is for warez (we need this back), binaries that have been changed after signing.

            Unsigned or self signed apps make you go to the control panel, unlock and click “open anyway” and have since Gatekeeper was introduced. But you can also run spctl and mess with app or blanket settings in the command line.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah I use both pretty regularly and I’m fairly sure macOS still makes you do the “nope sorry, press ok, go into system settings, security panel, become admin and click trust this unknown publisher” thing

        Just like I have to go into windows defender settings and add exclusions (trust) to anything it deems suspicious

        • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          That is only when it was flagged as malware.

          Defender is usually really great at defining malware and has little false positives. So you better watch out if you have to de-quarantine it.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Linux works great as long as the regular user doesn’t have root rights. In my opinion if you install Linux on your family’s or friends’ devices, you never give the root rights, unless you want them to eventually break their system, and you will need to be an administrator for their systems.

      Okay another option are immutable distros I guess, but you still can fuck them up easily (probably).

    • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Which would cause major problems for regular users. They need to be protected from themselves.

      It is one of the biggest reasons why Linux is not ready for mainstream in its current form.

      • Koarnine@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Lmao this is foolish, what about Bazzite and other immutable distributions, wouldn’t they then be more ready for mainstream than windows and mac os?

        Since it’s impossible to modify (and therefore break) the underlying system…

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is so dumb. Of course you can run an app coded by your friend. Either your friend can pay $100 a year to notarize their app, or you can pay $100 a year to run his app as a developer. Couldn’t be easier.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      At least it’s just a $100 on Windows you pay $800 a year to the certification mafia to get your code signed and get rid of the warning.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Either way, somebody pays Apple $10} a year. After paying them the equivalent of a kidney for the hardware. No thanks.