• JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Ok this sucks, but there is something that seems to be not implied. Wait one day, then confirm with biometrics, then decide if you want this only this time, or 1 week, or forever. You have to only deal with this one time if you choose forever (as long as you don’t reinstall, I assume).

    This is by no means ideal, but I think I’m ok with this. In a way I believe the rhetoric they are framing, to protect the vulnerable populace (e.g. the elderly) from frauds. For your phone, you can get the hurdle over one time, if you are installing for your parent you can do “don’t ask me for a week, or ask me again everytime”, so they don’t install something malicious as part of a guided “tech support”. Not saying that will prevent all and any spams but it will add some barrier. Just my opinion though, I could be off base with this.

    I do wish that 1 day waiting was a bit shorter.

    • orioler25@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      You’re off base with this. Almost unbelievably so.

      They know they aren’t concerned with scams, why are you pretending? The move is to restrict competition and improve surveillance capacity as much as possible with as much legal protection as possible for Google. “Vulnerable people” don’t typically know how to use F-Droid, and scammers would take a week to find out am effective alternative even if this was somehow their main tactic; which it is not and they did fine before it was an option.

      I own my phone. I get to pick what is installed on it. The fucking mandatory Google apps were already too far, this is straight up telegraphing intent to commodify as much of my life as they can get access to. Even beyond how fucking bad this is for the overall health of tech development and sovereignty, I dont want a company that is complicit with a fascist state to force me or anyone else who would challenge that state to register our fucking identities with them. For all I fucking know, they’d get me thrown into a camp as readily as they’d cut off my access to pirated media. You think it’s a coincidence they’re doing this shit at the same time liberals and fascists are desperately trying to seize some kind of control over the internet? It’s for grandma’s safety? The fuck it is.

  • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    De-googled Android ROMs:

    • GrapheneOS
    • LineageOS
    • /e/ OS
    • Volla OS

    Linux OSes that (allegedly) work on Android hardware (please suggest additions):

    • UBPorts
    • PostMarketOS

    Non-android, non-apple smartphones:

    • Pinephone
    • Pinephone pro
    • Librem 5
    • Volla Phone 22
    • Jolla Phone
    • FuriPhone FLX1s

    And pretty much every feature phone out there (way too many to list)

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      De-googled Android ROMs:

      Aren’t most of them de-googled? Usually you install gApps separately, unless that’s changed

      Non-android, non-apple smartphones:

      Not non-android out of the box, but just to add to your list: Ubuntu reports that nearly everything except VoLTE works on the Fairphone 4 and 5, but sadly they don’t support the 6 yet. PostMarketOS shows more issues

      • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I would guess that most Android ROMs are OEM ones that are not degoogled (and have the added spyware of Cellular Service Providers or phone brands), I’m not familiar enough with AOSP Stock Images to make a judgment on those, and the rest that I know of—which are actively maintained and have been around long enough brand-recognition that I trust them to be non-glitchy and spyware free—comprise the above list.

        If you got more suggestions, I will gladly add them to the list though.

        Ubuntu reports that nearly everything except VoLTE works on the Fairphone 4 and 5

        Oh snap, so is that UBPorts? I’m not sure how to classify that tbh, I might need a 3rd category that’s Linux Phone OSes that work on Android-focused phones. Actually, just looking at it rn and it looks like PostMarket claims to support over 700 devices…

  • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    i have come to love just not owning a smartphone anymore.

    World is way more of an adventure when you out and about without internet connection on you.

    Wana know how to get somewhere? Find a map or ask someone.

    Pay something? There is cash for that.

    Wana take a picture? Just take a camera with you, because lets be real 99% of the pics in your smartphones camera roll wont get viewed ever again anyhow.

    Wana meet with other people? Well make out a time and spot before u leave the house…

    Wana be reachable to others while u out and about? Dont! Its a wonderfull feeling not to be.

    Wana pass some time while waiting for someone/something? Bring a book.

    Sure it may be inconvinient for others that you are not instantly reachable 24/7. But its a wonderfull feeling not to be. To comunicate on your own terms.

    • collectif_imaginaire@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      That’s life before 2000, or even up to 2005 or like. Was not bad, really. Internet was slow and stuck in computers, astalavista, radium, emule and burning dvds The evolution of cellphones into smartphones was somehow a bad move for humanity

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Openness was the primary reason I always stuck with android. Without that, fuck them. If I have no options I’m just gonna use Huawei.

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Apple was the canary in the coal mine for this behavior in the EU. Apple was forced to allow third party apps, so Apple mandated that everyone had to register with them, and pay them their yearly fee, and then developers had to pay Apple another fee (core technology fee, still double dipping), and governments were completely fine with that. (And developers will happily jump through more hoops to develop on iOS).

      Google saw this and decided if they can, so can Google. And this technically is the easier of the two as at least this doesn’t require every developer to register with Google this way.

      • orioler25@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Really good point to illustrate how liberal reform efforts just redirect capitalist control into an increasingly contrived legal system.