• Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Young people “love” them because it’s a house they can afford. They’d “love” a regular house if they could afford one.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think that might be the most American photographer ever taken.

    What is the point in building teeny tiny homes if they’re going to be placed six feet apart and have no private space. The whole point of a small compact house is it leaves space over for communal stuff. This feels like an American visited Europe and completely failed grasp the point.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      The whole point of a small compact house is it leaves space over for communal stuff.

      What? The whole point is saving money, and smaller land is cheaper…

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        If that is so, what is the point of all that unusable wasted space around thise buildings, other than law requiring it for some randomreasons?

        Without that, those buildings could either have high quality outside space that could be used for gardening or a terrace or the area could be reduced.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          The point is for the developer to capitalize on the hype and fomo. Yes, most likely just enough space to meet property setbacks and utility easement requirements.

          They squeeze the most “houses” in the lot as they can.

      • PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        You know, we could make them even cheaper by cramming them so close they share walls and then stacking them on top of each other. And because they’re all together, we can call them apartments.

    • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      If they are in Texas then it’s 43C outside and 95% humidity, so you don’t go outside for anything if you don’t have to.

      Also these are just apartments that are actually apart. So, basically just really inefficient apartments.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yeah… well, maybe if you didn’t spend $60k on a truck and another $10k on a lift kit, you could afford a normal-sized house.

    The hell do you need a lifted F-250 for?! You’re not hauling anything, you’re not towing anything, and that lift kit just ruined whatever practical use the truck had in the first place.

    So you’ve got a 6,000-pound grocery-getting overcompensation machine that’s somehow less useful than the truck was before you modified it.

    Congratulations. You spent $70k to make a work truck worse at doing work.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      People who buy these trucks are not generally paying cash. After taxes and loan interest, that $70K overcompensation machine is easily over $100K, more than the tiny home.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      You know when I feel the most manly? When I successfully load my Kia Soul EV with groceries from Costco AND manage to get all four of my kids in there as well. A big pick-up truck is just cheating.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    People love them??!!! WTF! When I was a kid in rural South America we would pitty people who’s house was not solid brick and had side walk. “Hay pobrecitos”.

    That frame of mind as my “shades” that I see the world thru tell me that this is wrong. Micro houses should be for anyone who really truly wants one… For people in the middle of nowhere that need some sleep tonight. For the homeless who lost a job or got an expensive disease. ETC. Not for regular people in the city with good jobs.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, but it’s better than being unable to own a house for a lot of people. It’s absolutely not for me, I’m far more inclined towards a townhouse if possible, but I’m an engineer who wants to live in a more urban area.

      Houses have gotten ludicrously expensive compared to what people can afford in America. This is partly because housing is seen as an investment and so any policy that reduces housing cost will take a good chunk out of the wealth of a large portion of the population.

      But yeah the talks of extending home loans past 30 years is just egregious

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Housing as an investment is a problem. But so is having kids. Each kid needs a house until we die. So at least one extra house. When we die they get the other but then they’ll have the same problem… Kids… And where to house them.

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I saw these on YouTube shorts. They are insanely expensive. Maybe not for that area, but I ny small town of 400k in the Midwest it’s more than or equal to a full size house morgage.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I saw something similar on youtube about japanese inspired micro-apartments to create affordable living for the masses… the rent was like 1800-2500. Which is not affordable anything for anyone but the top 1%, who’d never lower themselves to living in 50 square feet.

  • Darkonion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Parking is always an issue, even with giant houses because they insists on 3-stall driveways making street parking vanish. They should just go ahead and make the street 16ft narrower since no one can park on the street anyway.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’d love to be able to not spend half the national median monthly wage on heating my home in the winter, which I live in because my ancestors built it and my ex got me in debt so I can’t actually live anywhere that would require a mortgage or rent.

      My kid probably loves having over 3000 sq ft (converted it for ya yanks) plus a garden, but if I lived alone and could afford to, I’d like something about a fifth of the size.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      If I wasn’t married with kids and grandkids, i would unironically love this. Small area to clean, necessities in one place. The fuck are y’all doing that you need a fucking gymnasium of space to live in? Think of how much less clutter and cleaning you’d have to deal with!

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can leave whenever the fuck you want, so I’d assume not. I highly doubt the living space is the main complaint people have about being incarcerated.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          “Young people love them” would usually point to people who don’t have kids. Yes, there are people out there who do have kids in their early twenties, but obviously these aren’t geared towards them.