It’s a movie starring his nephew in the lead role, approved by his estate, and by all accounts it just feels like an attempt to whitewash him. This is a man who was accused of being a serial child molester, settled with a family out of court for $25 million just to avoid a trial (Chandler), and openly admitted he slept in the same bed as kids while he was an adult (Bashir interview), among other things. I don’t really see what there is to debate.

Anything pointing this out gets backlash on movie-related subreddits, which I find wild. It makes me wonder, if Epstein could sing and dance, would he have gotten a biopic too? Would people be defending him like this?

  • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The original final third of the film dealt with the child abuse allegations. They filmed it all. And then one of the victims lawyers reminded them that they were not legally allowed to depict him in any way, so they had to scrap it