You know what? Shame for the imaginary, ideal, equitable world you have in your head, but as long as you aren’t exterminating people, some prejudice is good.
Lmao, what a terrible opinion. “Prejudice is okay because the world isn’t perfect.” At least you aren’t in denial like half the other people in this thread. The world will never be ideal or equitable as long as people like you are justifying, and advocating, the non-ideal and inequitable. Please spend less time in it.
The end goal is no one trusts anyone, and mutual safety is ENSURED. Because I have seen for myself that humans are incapable of anything else.
We have a somewhat viable society, because if you commit a crime, men with guns will come to stop you with force.
It’s not because of trust or anything like that.
But who will put down those men with guns? I have no idea.
Now, about the prejuduce part, it is fairly safe to assume that anyone who is a billionaire is a total psychopath.
Now, not all men are dangerous, but if you let your guard down near everyone, you will end up raped and dumped into the nearest lake, and won’t be equalizing anything.
You’re an idiot. And if you’ve read my comments you’d know I’m talking about prejudice based on immutable characteristics, not “billionaires” you fool, and I specifically addressed that I don’t advocate trusting everyone either. If you have to make such a gigantic leap in logic to make your argument, perhaps take a step back and have a think for once. You’re clearly some sort of troll or functioning on an immense deficit, and in either case I have no interest in learning whatever malformed thoughts drip out of your head.
You know what? Shame for the imaginary, ideal, equitable world you have in your head, but as long as you aren’t exterminating people, some prejudice is good.
Lmao, what a terrible opinion. “Prejudice is okay because the world isn’t perfect.” At least you aren’t in denial like half the other people in this thread. The world will never be ideal or equitable as long as people like you are justifying, and advocating, the non-ideal and inequitable. Please spend less time in it.
The end goal is no one trusts anyone, and mutual safety is ENSURED. Because I have seen for myself that humans are incapable of anything else.
We have a somewhat viable society, because if you commit a crime, men with guns will come to stop you with force.
It’s not because of trust or anything like that.
But who will put down those men with guns? I have no idea.
Now, about the prejuduce part, it is fairly safe to assume that anyone who is a billionaire is a total psychopath.
Now, not all men are dangerous, but if you let your guard down near everyone, you will end up raped and dumped into the nearest lake, and won’t be equalizing anything.
You’re an idiot. And if you’ve read my comments you’d know I’m talking about prejudice based on immutable characteristics, not “billionaires” you fool, and I specifically addressed that I don’t advocate trusting everyone either. If you have to make such a gigantic leap in logic to make your argument, perhaps take a step back and have a think for once. You’re clearly some sort of troll or functioning on an immense deficit, and in either case I have no interest in learning whatever malformed thoughts drip out of your head.
Oh, you will find out if I was a troll or idiot within a few years yourself.