• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      National Lab of the Rockets…? An acronym that sounds like it was made by a grade schooler. Which checks out, if we’re being honest.

      Edit: lol I misread it, but the actual name is still very dumb

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh cool so more lithium than they k ow what do do with. What’s next laws stating everyone has to own at least 100 phones and 50 laptops?

    • shweddy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And lithium batteries are already obsolete sodium ion battery can last thousands of charge cycles

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not really there’s a reason lithium is still used. Other battery chemistries have other drawbacks beyond longevity.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              They actually are.

              https://www.geeky-gadgets.com/bluetti-sodium-ion-portable-power-station/

              Not yet at price parity with Lithium Ion, if you go by total charge capacity, and they are heavier and larger per watt hout charge capacity…

              … but they can cycle a considerablely greater number of times, they have longer expected lifespans, work better in cold weather, can charge and discharge faster.

              EDIT

              Derp, ok, the above isn’t solid state… but it is a viable product, without being solid state.

              Given the rate of adoption and research going into sodium ion related tech, solid state sodium ion may be a thing in under two years… a hell of a lot of people are actively working on solving basically assembly line and industrial use specific problems right now.

              • Elting@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                If they can scale I could imagine them making good battery arrays. The largest batteries in the world are not a chemical batteries currently however. Think 20-40 GWh vs 400 MWh (at a cursory search) being the largest current chemical battery arrays. Pumped storage plants can’t be built everywhere, and are massively huge infrastructure projects, but as we switch more and more to solar energy we are going to need to make it through the nights somehow. They currently are often used to provide grid stability by discharging during peak hours, and buying cheap power to pump water back up during peak production/lowest demand when electricity is cheapest. This works especially well already with many renewables, including wind farms when you don’t have control over production. If they can build sodium ion battery arrays cheaply enough though, pumped storage plants could maybe just be obsoleted.

                • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I would think sodium ion would particularly make sense in an EV, or a hybrid.

                  Even if they aren’t as energy dense, per weight and volume… the longevity, the rechargability, the cold weather effectiveness.

                  That addresses… so many of the problems that EVs as depreciating assets face, and it makes EVs make sense in areas that are currently too cold too often for them to make sense.

                  A sensible world could make this work so well with a decent charging network.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s next? Hopefully domestic-component grid storage batteries and EV batteries for greatly reduced cost and less reliance on China.

      Any serious effort towards a “green” future is going to require better home and vehicular energy generation and storage. We need gridscale batteries and EV batteries, cheaply, now.

  • Mpatch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just like always USA fighting yesterday war. Lithium is already on the way out.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would be extremely disappointed in the species if we’re still using lithium batteries in 328 years time. Not that I actually believe that estimate.

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        for anyone who doesn’t know what this is. the dark red is the Appalachian Bio-Region. the light red is the Appalachian Regional Commission’s mandated jurisdictional scope. the ARC is a federal-state joint partnership established in 1960 with the mandate to develop the appalachian region economically as part of America’s War on Poverty. HOWEVER, from the outset there were flaws with the commission’s outlook and approach to the region. namely, they sought to address poverty by setting up even more extractive economies in the region rather than de-esclating the institutional violence enacted against an internal colony. in the time since the foundation of the ARC, the disparity of economic incomes within and without the region has only increased.

        there’s a littany of reasons for this, but core to all of them is that politicians look at a map and see economic wealth instead of people. no respect is given our needs or experiences by the oligarchs who control these so called united states of america. they think they can decide for us our futuoe, and because they have an economic and militaristic monopoly on violence, they roughly can. lumber has grven way to bituminous coal has given way to anthracite coal has given way to natural gas has given way to uranium and is now currently giving way to AI data centers and soon apparently lithium mines.

        these are sad and frustrating times

    • Akrenion@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      More options for batteries is always good. Doesn’t negate the demand for more storage in general.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s better than that even, switching to sodium for grid scale storage means more available lithium and cobalt for instances where battery size and weight actually matter. And could even lower prices on lithium

  • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have a feeling they’ll have a much harder time pushing through mining operations in Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire than they did in West VA. This will be received like proposals of mining the great lakes would in MI or WI, and many of the residents (Boston area professors) have the resources and energy to resist it.

      • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep and they’re working on removing protections for other federal land which I have little doubt they’re accomplish given it was the fed previously protecting it. I’m just saying I think it will be difficult to actually implement projects in some places due to local opposition combined with the energy and resources to sustain that opposition.

        Not a good thing overall btw, by my figuring it just means under-resourced regions will continue to shoulder the bulk of industrial waste and pollution because they’ll be the least equipped to resist. Tale as old as time.

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont all have different groups that individually disagree with mining once protected wilderness. The only selection of people pushing for this would be the rich who want the money.

        I would not fuck with rights of New Hampshire. They will come after you. Never met one who wasn’t a bit off.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          When the Civil War was breaking out and the governor of Vermont called for the state to raise $500k to support the war effort, the legislature passed a bill to raise a full million.

          When they were called upon to send one regiment of men to fight, they organized seven.

          Vermont, also, would not be a good state with which to openly fuck.

          I love Vermont because of her hills and valleys, her scenery and invigorating climate, but most of all, because of her indomitable people. They are a race of pioneers who almost beggared themselves to serve others. If the spirit of liberty should vanish in other parts of the union and support of our institutions should languish, it could all be replenished from the generous store held by the people of this brave little state of Vermont.

          –Calvin Coolidge

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            They may be a bunch of hippie hillbillies, but they’re the most chaotic good state. They fought in the revolutionary war and then didn’t join the union for a while

        • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s like the push to deforest the western states. You’ll be surprised by the weird alliances that pop up when billionaires show up in the backyard. Wish we could find common ground broadly, but I guess I’ll take what I can get.

  • MattEagle [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    By the time any of these mines or refineries come online, lithium ion batteries will be being replaced by sodium ion for the larger EV and storage batteries. Besides that, America hardly manufactures phones or laptops.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well uh, China.

      Untill they figure out that you can’t just cram raw ore into a battery or computer.

      ETA on them figuring that out … 2-3 years?

      Oh right, and then you actually have to build the refineries.

      I’m goin with ‘within the next 2 years’, being said for approximately 8 years.

  • ChogChog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have a running joke I tell my friends that one day, the rich will flatten mountains, so the only way to see their natural wonder will be in VR. That’s when they will become mainstream. Not because they offer some new technological advancement, but because they’ve managed to capture the spaces we use to get away.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There’s a video clip of a song in French with a similar concept from 2003. A child is frolicking and playing in nature until we discover that it’s all synthetic, her time is up, and other children are lining up for their time in “nature” too. Mickey 3D - Respire on YouTube.

      From a description of the song on Wikipedia:

      The text of the song addresses a “kid” to alert him about the state of the world that adults will leave to him. The first part of the song deals with the story of humans’ arrival on Earth and their disturbance of the whole balance of nature. The second part imagines the future of people if they continue to do so (referring to the disappearance of natural resources, animals and even genetic modification because of pollution) and how the “kid” will try to explain to his grandchildren why he did nothing to prevent it. The third part speaks about the state of slavery, misery, and shame of the human species as well as the unpredictability of its future.

    • BlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well here in america we already have flattened mountains. And also maybe bombed our own citizens who felt some sorta way about it.

    • Artemis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wild, but this is already happening - Tuvalu is being “preserved” in vr as it’s going to be one of the first island nations wiped out by climate change.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They already take the tops off mountains in Appalachia because it’s more efficient to just straight up delete a mountain to get coal than to dig into it for it

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        this style of mining also requires fewer operators than a deep mine. it has had deeply devestating consequences to me and my neighbors