• Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Hey uh, Mission Control? I’ve got two Outlooks and neither of them are working” A real quote from the mission btw

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I program for ships (the water kind) and buddy, you ain’t seen nothin’. I’m talking server infrastructure from 1991. Spaghetti code from the 80’s. I had a program that had to run on a dos box, and we had to replace the whole thing because the original developer fucking DIED and no one could read his shit.

    • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I feel like a lot of people are in the bank of “why change of it ain’t broke?” That’s how you have people working some CNC machines on hardware and software available when the business started.

      • Glemek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        There are still manual machinists around who have jobs like bore a few individual holes on some weldment.

    • vrek@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I worked in medical electronic manufacturing. Changing a single setting for ease of use to the operator was planned as a 2 year project. Literally change a 0 to 1 in one of the files…

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’d imagine that one is because of medical more than anything else. There are all sorts of regulations around medical devices. That slows shit down.

        • vrek@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Absolutely. I got well acquainted with the regulations. The sad part is it was so slow to update anything nothing got updated.

          This system needs to be operational by next week. It will be a month before its well made. This needs to be operational by next week. Ok, but then we can fix it right?

          Not to mention any changes to anything got evaluated as either a notice update, a 90 day submission, or a full submission(6 months - 2 years depending on fda, bsi and severity of change). That’s in addition to the actual work. I could make a change in a afternoon and may see it in production next year.

      • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        A friend of mine writes code for the control systems in nuclear power plants. He told me, on average he writes 13 pages of documentation for each line of code.

        • vrek@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          From working in medical device if that’s all the documentation he is writing I’m jealous.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Your rocket will ignite in fifteen minutes.

    Actually, it’s looking more like six days.

    No wait, thirty seconds.

    • Fetus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      10

      9

      8

      7

      6

      5

      4

      Windows is installing updates. Please don’t turn off your computer.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    At this point, I’d feel much safer on a Win10 powered spaceship than a Win11 one. At least it isn’t “30% AI-generated”.

    • musubibreakfast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      “The trajectory of your ship has changed because a critical windows update rebooted your ship during launch. You are now heading directly into the sun. Press the task bar for a list of AI suggested solutions.”

      -Ground control

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Houston, I’ve dropped the stilus! Noise iiiiii

    Eheeeeeh can I go get it? Noise iiiiii

    Negative! That’s a negative young man! You shouldn’t have been playing on it during flight, you dad told you to put it away! You’re supposed to be there in the moment and enjoy the flight and to look back at planet earth as the pale blue ball. Now sit there and wait until the engine stops.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    could be worse. last year, deutsche bahn put up a job ad looking for a developer familiar with windows 3.1 in a networked environment to work on their fleet of high speed trains.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      windows 3.1 in a networked environment

      Sorry, what? Is this a thing where they beat the Y2K bug by just moving their clocks back for 30 years?

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Industrial embedded software is such a shitshow. Somehow Microsoft convinced companies that Windows is a great solution for controlling heavy machinery.

      Tbh there’s no reports of that choice leading to actual accidents, but still you’re stuck with an old version of Windows with no possibility of upgrade.

    • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      On the plus side, you might also end up maintaining their own Linux distribution Linux4ICE (or the newer one called EULE) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        specifically i think it’s the speedometers that run windows for workgroups. it might be one of those controlled systems you can’t switch out without recertifying everything.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    You know we’re sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn’t it?

  • Jomega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Doesn’t NASA use older tech because it’s more secure? I think I remember reading that somewhere.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I was always told it had to do with how long it took to get things approved. I remember when it was a big deal that the space shuttles were upgraded to 486s… in 2002.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        it’s also because the smaller a transistor is, the more sensitive it is to cosmic rays. and there are a lot more cosmic rays in space than on earth. you can “rad-harden” them, but there are physical limits. as a result the most popular cpu architecture in space is the RAD750, based on the PowerPC 750 from 1997. the perseverance rover and the james webb space telescope are basically underclocked gamecubes, or those candy-colored imacs. like, perserverance runs at 133MHz and has 128MB of RAM.

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I believe it was the 2006/7 Seattle New Years or 4th of July fireworks that had been rigged up to orchestrate by “the latest microsoft technology” and the thing refused to execute and they rebooted the machine three times before someone just gave up and went and hit the firework triggers manually. Most people are pretty sure it was a wide beta version of Vista.