• Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can make own at home, with a blender.

    Roast your own nuts of choice.

    Roasted Almond. Great.

    Roasted Almond with roasted Hemp kernels. Great.

    Roasted Almonds with roasted Hemp kernels, walnuts, pecans, pistachios, brazil nuts, hazelnuts, with a dash of chocolate, chilli, turmeric and white pepper… Great.

    Taking the junk from the corporation… Not so great.

    Much more fun exploring what ingredients go in your food, rather than have the corporation choose for you. They don’t choose for you. They choose for themselves, at you. You end up with junk instead of food.

    Much more fun making your own. Healthier, cost similar, more nutrition, and no where near as much nutrientless white crystalline addictants… unless you want that, and can add sugar back in if you want. (Roasting makes it sweet though. Top tip. Healthy sweet.)

    Just almonds, roasted, then blended smooth at a medium speed. Try it. See which wins your taste test.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Once read a thread where someone was asking the best way to eat it. There were suggestions like on toast, or with banana slices. But the best answer—and the one that had me laughing in tears—was:
      With your whole hand.

    • recentSlinky@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh god who would do such a thing!?! Next you’d tell me some people would scrape their fingers all around the inside of the jar and lick them making sure they get every last remaining chocolate of that sweet sweet nector of the gods. And even stick their tongue inside, making out style with the jar, making sure no more chocolate taste left 🤤

  • El care ñá@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Although that is nutritionally bad, it’s not that atypical from a gastronomic point of view. I mean, jams end up being about half their weight in sugar too.

    That much oil is uncalled for, though.

    • petersr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      European here. Sorry, but it is so ridiculous that labels don’t just show some standardized “per 100 g” so things are easily compared without math.

      • conartistpanda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah same opinion here, guess they cant make it easy for people to know what they put in their bodies or they might start caring right?

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Imagine how we feel in the US being given numbers interchangeably in ounces and pounds. Nothing like dividing random numbers by 16 in your head in the store. Grams would be so much easier for this purpose.

      • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I keep a spreadsheet with that information.

        Here are the macros for nutella, per 100 g:

        • 540 kcal
        • ~30 g fat
        • ~60 g carbs
        • 5.4 g protein
        • 2.7 g fiber

        the problem with per 100 g is that some foods are eaten in much smaller quantities, so the “per serving” (if a serving size is accurate) is actually more helpful for knowing how reasonable it is to eat.

        I would just like the per 100 g nutrition information in addition to the per serving information.

        • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think both “per serving” and “per 100g” should be required. Some foods/drinks come with “0g carbs” or “0 calories” in small enough servings, but only because the actual amount is negligible. The problem is that once the serving gets large enough, those things do start to matter, especially for instance carbs for diabetics.

          Multiple times I’ve run into a “low carb” or “low sugar” drink that said something like 2 or 3g carbs per serving, and then had 2 or 3 servings per bottle, which ending up raising my blood sugar more than expected. Technically that’s on me for not checking the “per serving” and “servings per container”, and I’ve since learned my lesson, but it’s still annoying.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Add in a “per container” for things that are realistically seen as a single serving, like your drink example.

            That way I don’t have to do the ‘per 100g’ figuring and I have a realistic assessment of that small can of soup that’s somehow supposed to be 2 to 3 servings.

  • X@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I absolutely get the point. That said, I prefer eating my pizza dough first, then cheese, then marinara sauce. Sometimes I go sauce first when I think no one’s looking. Drink it right outta the tub like a champ.