• Sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I haven’t watched newer works in the Star Wars franchise but in my opinion Star Wars doesn’t qualify as science fiction but is more like a space fantasy story.

      Science fiction is more like a thought experiment: What would happen if society or technology would develop in this or that way? That’s what Star Trek is doing for the most part (at least the older installments).

      Edit: To be clear: I am not saying, Star Wars is bad. It is obviously highly regarded for a good reason. Im just saying it’s not science fiction.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right, intelligent aliens communicating, governing, trading, and fighting alongside humans in interstellar wars with faster-than-light travel, space lasers, artificial intelligence, autonomous robots, planet-destroying superweapons, cybernetics, cloning, advanced prosthetics, and energy weapons does not qualify as science fiction because it also has mysticism, prophecy, telekinesis, and sword fights…

        • Sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nah that’s not my point at all. I’m not saying all that space, alien and tech stuff doesn’t qualify as sci-fi because of the mysticism/prophecy/magic. My point is that you could probably tell Star Wars’ tale just as well without all those aspects in a traditional fantasy setting for example. Sci-fi, in my opinion, utilizes science or technology to start thought experiments and tell stories that wouldn’t be possible.

          Take for example “Do Androids dream of electric sheep?” (the book Bladerunner is based on): The story tackles the ethical question at which point an artificial lifeform can be considered a person and should be treated as such. This is classic sci-fi: Take a fictional advanced technology and discuss the ethical or societal problems that may result from this technology.

          This is something at least classic Star Trek does quite often while most of Star Wars’ technology could very well be replaced by fantasy elements without the underlying story being fundamentally different.

      • Demigodrick@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        I’ve reviewed their votes and there’s nothing to suggest they interact with your account regularly or are manipulating any downvotes.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          And if you look at the votes for the comment above comment you’ll see him in action again.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The section from Andor to Return of the Jedi is the plateau of Star Wars. The rest have good parts, even great ones, but that stretch is the core.

        Star Trek isn’t as obvious, it’s a scattershot of ups and down all the way through. Which is appropriate, as most of it is episodic with mainly references holding it together.

        • Andy@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          This is what I came to say.

          I think because of the comedy it often gets overlooked as a genuine Star Trek show. And that’s a mistake.

        • cattywampas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I like Lower Decks. But I wouldn’t put it anywhere near the same tier in Star Trek relative to Andor in Star Wars. It’s basically Memory Alpha: The Show. It’s entertaining but it primarily serves as a vehicle for Easter eggs, references, cameos, and satire.

          • Andy@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Hard disagree.

            The characters and stories stand on their own. The jokes are great too, but ultimately, I care about the characters and their journeys as much as I cared about the TNG Enterprise crew.

            It’s got real heart.

            • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I agree with both of you. I liked it a lot but I would liked it more if it had less references that often felt too easy or forced.

              • homes@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I find that ironic for a show whose major theme is accepting things for what they are rather than for what you expect them to be

                • cattywampas@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  We’re not saying Star Trek is “supposed to be” a certain way, but we’re still allowed to like or dislike it. I’m not one of these chuds who says DIS or LD or STA isn’t “real Trek” or isn’t canon, but I still don’t love them.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was in the trek camp when I was younger. But from a story perspective i think the episodic TV has aged poorly and the movies are just double episodes of TV. (This applies to Stargate too, for me.)

    Theres something to be said about the social commentary certainly but meh.

    Star Wars remains awful but at least it has entertaining aspects; it’s like the Marvel franchise now. Boom, explosion, wow. Though - Marvel has too much in the Team America Saves the World aspect (much like SG).

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s interesting to watch Star Trek in release order and see how it shifted with the times from standalone episodes that are almost never mentioned again, gradually into more continuous story arcs

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t have a strong preference. I’m just waiting for the Star Trek Wars, followed by the Star Wars Trek (when Star Trek wins the war and Star Wars is sent into exile).

    (Futurama reference, for those who didn’t know.)

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Both. Grew up with Star Wars as I have an older brother who had IV-VI on VHS.

    Later in life I found myself in a job that took me offshore without internet access, so I needed something to watch on my laptop. As I considered myself a geek, and having never watched Star Trek, I torrented all of star trek and brought it with me. I started with The Cage, went over to Original series, and so forth. Last I saw was Enterprise.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I need more context. when my wife and I were doing the cryptic mmo’s we would talk about how star trek was the fantasy world you would actually want to live in. Especially as a general person and not a significant figure or such. Now movie wise there is more star wars I would want to watch over star trek but I think my favorite ones might be trek. Series wise there is more trek I would want to watch over wars. Both have been enshitified like almost all ips now a days.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I won’t argue that both have released some superfluous cash-in content, but can you really say that they’ve enshitified when we also get stuff like Lower Decks and Andor?

      Both have produced mixed content, but they’ve also each released some of their best entries during the last five years.