potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoCome on, just do it.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageCome on, just do it.lemmy.worldpotoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square33linkfedilink
minus-squareOwOarchist@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoFill them with hydrogen instead. Cheaper and not a limited resource. More buoyant, which will help lift the weight of clothes and such. If a few of them burst into flames along the way, that will only freak out the fundies even more.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months ago Fill them with hydrogen instead. Even setting aside the high flammability, hydrogen is a bitch to store and transport. You really just need something lighter than Nitrogen to get an object airborne. Consider Ammonia or Methane instead.
minus-squareOwOarchist@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months ago hydrogen is a bitch to store and transport. Could just produce it in-situ, maybe? Lots of chemical reactions produce hydrogen gas as a byproduct.
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoIf I’m going through the trouble to fill these things with hydrogen, there will be no if, and it won’t be a few.
Fill them with hydrogen instead.
Cheaper and not a limited resource.
More buoyant, which will help lift the weight of clothes and such.
If a few of them burst into flames along the way, that will only freak out the fundies even more.
Even setting aside the high flammability, hydrogen is a bitch to store and transport.
You really just need something lighter than Nitrogen to get an object airborne.
Consider Ammonia or Methane instead.
TIL that farts are buoyant.
Could just produce it in-situ, maybe? Lots of chemical reactions produce hydrogen gas as a byproduct.
If I’m going through the trouble to fill these things with hydrogen, there will be no if, and it won’t be a few.