Grok, is it better for someone to have a trillion dollars or for society to have universal health care?

One person’s extreme wealth might improve outcomes for their immediate circle or spark breakthroughs, but it cannot equal the guaranteed, equitable gains of universal coverage for everyone. Societies that prioritize universal access (and manage costs) have thrived with strong metrics; those chasing billionaires have not demonstrated superior aggregate well-being. Society’s long-term success depends more on widespread health and opportunity than on whether any one person holds a trillion dollars. Universal health care aligns better with both empirical evidence and the human imperative to reduce suffering and build trust.

Damn, looks like the rich pedo is gonna to rekajigger his coding (again) so his own AI slop bot stops telling people that rich fucks are bad for everyone.