• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So they threatened the pope of the catholic church with assassination… Thats some Israeli level shit. Is Trump even the president at this point?

      • vga@sopuli.xyzBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sure the historical Templars would’ve been so happy about somebody trying to copycat their style.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      We’re gonna get a schism and the Church of America because Trump is basically Henry VIII but somehow even more disgusting

      • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hate to break it to you, but we already have this. It’s known as Evangelicalism.

        (And yes, I know that there are decent folks in the Evangelical world; I’ve met them. But, overall, the movement has become a cesspit of fascist-aligned nationalistic heresy that doesn’t even really seem to believe in the person at the center of Christianity. Also, the great irony of your example is that the American branch of Henry VIII’s church–the Episcopal Church–is now considered too woke to be Christian by these people.)

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh yeah, I forgot about the Episcopals

          Still, I think every schism probably had people saying “But we already have [religion]” before they went down

          Whether or not there are decent evangelicals was kinda beside my point (I was just imagining historical parallels), but I agree and it’s definitely worth repeating

  • gary215@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nazis also had a problem with the Vatican during War World Two, What could possibly be the common reason now?

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unironically this. Jesus was not big on religious authorities.

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So I am an atheist, but the last 2 popes have been pretty nice people, right? The Vatican doesn’t seem obviously corrupt. Nothing at all like the insane blatantly abusive megachurches in the US.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Have you seen how gaudy the Vatican is? Jesus was killed right after flipping his shit because there were money changers operating in the temple.

            He’d be livid to find out how the church used his sacrifice for humanity to get wealthy.

            • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              But I kinda like pretty and big churches. E.g. Sagrada Família is amazing - that was built for all of us to enjoy, not just the church narrowly.

              They feel different to me than a megachurch pastor buying his second personal jet.

      • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is about Saint Paul. According to tradition, Saint Peter was the first bishop of Rome (and, thus, the first pope). Different guys. Paul was basically the first Christian theologian.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most of those Republicans are some flavor of Protestant, so it tracks

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You understand that magats are typically protestant right?

      Jesus (as written) would likely be very upset about a church that builds enormous cathedrals, hoards gold, has a corrupt “priest class” and has at times waged war.

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The American Catholic Church leadership is extremely conservative however and they hate the pope, they hated the last Pope as well. They would kill him themself if they could. There are exceptions but by and large the American Catholic Church leadership are Nazis.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The American Catholic Church leadership is extremely conservative however and they hate the pope,

            Even though the current pope is literally one of them. An American Catholic.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Bullshit. You can’t compare Catholic leadership to MAGAts. They may be pretty conservative but by and large are horrified by this administration.

            This is not “both conservatives are the same”

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You can’t compare Catholic leadership to MAGAts.

              Sure we can. Catholic leadership protects those who rape little boys the way MAGAts protect those who rape little girls.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            My grandmother, who was a devout Roman Catholic her whole life, even getting awarded for her service to the church, said that the Pope needed to mind his own business when he was criticizing Trump wanting to build the wall in his first term.

            I’m glad she died before his second term.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You understand that magats are typically protestant right?

        The vice president is (or claims to be) catholic.

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is making some heavy assumptions about what the average MAGAT knows about Jesus. As far as most of them are concerned, Jesus’ favorite gun would be an AR-15.

        For them, the Bible is merely a thick paper tweet to be used to smack anybody who disagrees with them like a cartoon character smacking a dog with the newspaper.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is making some heavy assumptions about what the average MAGAT knows about Jesus. As far as most of them are concerned, Jesus’ favorite gun would be an AR-15.

          Sure - but one thing they also know is that “Catholics aren’t Christian”.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It would be ironic if Trump does to the Vatican what he did to Venezuela, even after the US Catholic Bishops’ drive toward outlawing Abortion might have been the decisive factor giving Trump enough support to win both elections.

    • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      From what I’ve seen, there seems to be a difference in priorities between Catholic leadership in America vs the rest of the world. If the Republicans continue to antagonize the Pope, that would probably work in their favor.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re not wrong, but that’s not the way Catholicism works. People overplay the “infallibility” angle, but the bishops are supposed to listen to the Pope, that’s the whole point.

        The logical end result of “a difference in priorities between Catholic leadership in America vs the rest of the world.” is either that the US bishops get in line, or we have a new Schism.

        And I think this Pope knows it. The original Pope Leo is literally the Patron Saint of “defending against heresy”. He chose that name for a reason.

        • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re totally right about the fact that they’re supposed to follow the Pope, but they’re also throwing references to the Avignon Papacy.

          It could also very well be a schism where you have the American cardinals declare the Pope is from their own ranks backed by the State while another is in Rome. We’ve already seen a superpower do this with Buddhism.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s the middle ground of enough bishops get fired to bring the rest inline.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Vatican could probably wipe out just about any government on Earth if it wanted to. They’ve got billions of sleeper agents all over the world who’d do whatever it tells them, many of them in the very governments they want to destroy. “The US has threatened to destroy Catholicism. You know what you need to do!” and suddenly everyone from mafiosos to Irish grannies to couch fuckers would be booking flights to Mar-a-Lago.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Someone in the meeting then reportedly mentioned the Avignon Papacy to Pierre. This refers to a 14th century attack on the Vatican by the French king, in which Pope Boniface VIII was murdered by assassins and the Vatican was forced to relocate to Avignon where it could be controlled by the French crown for the next 67 years.

    Sounds like they’re threatening to do to the pope what they did to Maduro.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is being reported by The Free Press that in the meeting [Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge] Colby told [the Vatican ambassador to the U.S.] Pierre, “The United States has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world. The Catholic Church had better take its side.”

    well the US has now totally gone rogue.

    • grte@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      he United States has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world

      There’s this thing with a strait that seems to suggest otherwise.

    • rozodru@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      at this point a “military operation” into Vatican City of all places by the US wouldn’t surprise me.

      • spirinolas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I think the defense of the Vatican is the responsibility of Italy. They don’t play games with their sovereignty. Also, the Swiss Guard is far from being a cerimonial guard. They are on the level of special elite forces and they will kick some serious ass or die trying.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_of_Sigonella?wprov=sfla1

        An attack on Italian troops would be an attack all of the EU. Even the UK would have something to say. You worried about the strait of Hormuz? Try Gibraltar…

        An attack on the Vatican will also be an attack on all the Catholic world. The US would lose, no chance.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The US would lose, no chance.

          Maybe we haven’t been losing enough. Our losers might want to lose more bigly.

          We’re getting away from “speak softly and carry a big stick.” We’re more interested now in yelling loudly while shooting ourselves in the foot.

          Hopefully things are better in a year.

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The CIA kidnapped Italian I don’t know if they were citizens but people legally allowed to be in Italy off the streets and flew them to Guantanamo and tortured them forever without telling italy, without permission and despite Italy trying to do do stuff about it nothing came of it. We also have military bases in Italy still last I heard.

          • Brummbaer@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Do you think if the Italian government was involved in that they would come out and say it?

            These are need to know things and the public doesn’t need to know …

      • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That would “prove” trump’s god is better than their god.

        Just like the Spaniards did in Mexico.

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe we should start a betting pool, my money is on kidnapping the ICC officials, but I’m also leaning towards taking the Nobel committee hostage at some point to make them sign over the Peace Prize.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Someone in the meeting then reportedly mentioned the Avignon Papacy to Pierre. This refers to a 14th century attack on the Vatican by the French king, in which Pope Boniface VIII was murdered by assassins and the Vatican was forced to relocate to Avignon where it could be controlled by the French crown for the next 67 years.

        FTA

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The US reps probably went into the meeting with chatgpt open and just kept typing “I want the pope to stop being mean to israel, what do I say now?” to the prompt. I doubt they knew what they were saying.

          • rainwall@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Im sure they just asked grok about pope murders so they could make a absolutely ludicrious threat.

            • nomy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The longer we keep pretending they’re idiots who don’t know what they’re talking about the longer we’ll be in this.

              The ones in front might be drooling simpletons but the ones in the back have done their homework and know exactly the threat they’re making.

              • rainwall@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Its clear they meant to make a very, very stupid threat, but im also sure they did it in the laziest, shittiest way possible.

                The stupidity comes from trying to threaten a religious figurehead of a church of 1 billion people with assasination in our media enstrangled world when the president can’t even handle the bad polling from gas prices going up.

                I have no doubt some of his inner circle would gladly murder the pope to make a point, but their evil is also grossly incompotent.

                • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The stupidity comes from trying to threaten a religious figurehead of a church of 1 billion people with assassination in our media enstrangled world when the president can’t even handle the bad polling from gas prices going up.

                  I have no doubt some of his inner circle would gladly murder the pope to make a point, but their evil is also grossly incompetent.

                  This, exactly. I’m not even a believer, but I know the history very well, and I’d readily bet on a group that has lasted in its current form for roughly a thousand years (see note below) and has something like 1.3 billion adherents, over a diaper-wearing kiddie-raping bully that hasn’t even made 80 and is firing his own cabinet members during the most stupid war he could ever have started while he systematically works to destroy his own country. They believe in an unconquerable god and heavenly king; Trump believes he is god and wants to be a king. In a war of ideas with a roomful of religious historians (aka Jesuits) Trump’s bullies are not winning jack shit.

                  Whoever mentioned Avignon meant it as a threat, but for anyone who knows history – and these cardinals certainly do – in 2000 years of Christianity, for the Catholics Avignon was a blip in time that the Church overcame and was made stronger by. Knowing some historically-minded Catholics (and Eastern Orthodox, too!) and how into the history they really, really are, the mention of Avignon is not nearly as much of a threat to the Pope as it is a reminder of the supremacy of the church throughout the ages, and how challengers come and go but the Church remains.

                  The cardinals really do think like this; this is not an exaggeration. That DoD fool only thought he was lecturing the cardinal, lol. I’ve been personally witness to sincere, hours-long religious arguments over historical concepts like apostolic succession (though not with cardinals, lol), and compared to that Avignon wasn’t even a hiccup. I’d put money on all those cardinals catching each other’s eyes and smirking when the Americans weren’t looking, because every cardinal in that room was thinking about papal history in the long term: in that context, the DoD rep was simply making an ass of himself.

                  Let’s see Polymarket take this one up. Pope v. Trump: who wins? It’s a no-brainer. I’ll take the guy in the white dress.

                  Note: I’m going with the Great Schism of 1054; others might calculate it differently