that’s it. nothing more to really add to it. it’s quite simple.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      i don’t fucking know. some people are merely posting the versions they find and sharing comics they love. some people are actively defacing beauty and it hurts my soul (yes i am being overly dramatic i am a DIVA QUEEN y’all know this)

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The way to hell is paved with good intensions…

    The current proposal is not specific enough: With your proposal every post effectively requires an artist signature. There will always be some valid reason why there is none. Also who should check/enforce this? The single non-existing mod? xD

    Keep it simpler and make a rule that says: Content created by somebody else requires attribution.

    Attribution could be an artist signature in the comic, the name of the artist in the description or a link to the original source in a comment.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      My good dude, hell has the good food, the good music, the good wine, even the good Nixon(below) (the evil one went to heaven, have you seen the kind of people that go there?).

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If I were to indulge in pedantry, the rule would be against cropping signatures, not requiring they exist. If it’s unsigned then there’s nothing to crop. I like your phrasing much better though, require attribution if you have it.

  • Beep@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I disagree strongly.

    I recommend adding a encouragement for watermark free comics.

        • moakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          You think that giving artists credit for their work is the same as “looking at ads”?

          I’m speechless. Truly dumbfounded. There are so many ways to respond, and none of them quite suit the unique situation that’s going on in your head.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          My friend, it’s not an ad. It’s “hey, I did this. This is my work.”

          The ad is “here is more of my work and this is how much it costs”. Do you see that in a watermark or signature? Ads encourage the exchange of money.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I respect that you hold this opinion, but like, one of my best friends is an illustrator and this kind of stuff hurts his feelings. Hurting his feelings hurts my feeling and i only got one. It’s personal to me, you know?

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I understand not wanting watermarks on like, a wallpaper community but comics?

  • iamthetot@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would go a step further and suggest that only links to official sources are allowed. But I know that would be very unpopular.

    Obviously I use and enjoy this community, but we could be contributing more traffic to their official sources. I cannot imagine more than a tiny fraction of a percent of people will see a comic image posted here and then go seek out the artist’s official sources.

  • Sc00ter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    You also need some way to validate that its not interface specific. The amount of threads that ive been in that have had people complaining that the artist name was cropped, but in my app (voyager) ive been able to see the whole image, is too damn high.

  • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    A good number of strips will be pre-cropped, or the equivalent. So what you’d really want when the signature’s missing is to have the poster do reverse-image as necessary so as to identify the creator, making sure to include that information.

    There’s also the fact that doubtless there will be posters ignoring such a rule / guideline, ideally necessitating mod intervention. Meanwhile, the one and only mod looks like they haven’t been active in a month.

    ¯\(ツ)

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So what you’d really want when the signature’s missing is to have the poster do reverse-image […]

      Nah, they can just not perpetuate stolen art. Keep it easy.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Also, if you like the strip and have the time, help the person out and put up a signature or post the original with a signature, while reminding them that they should have posted a signature as well. These communities are a team effort.

      • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        True. Assuming they pay any attention to that one out of an unusually long list of sidebar rules. That doesn’t change the mod situation, either, and you’d need a mod to actually add that rule.

      • RustyShackleford@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Here’s an idea: add easily accessible links so that even those less technologically inclined can easily reverse image search. Since many younger users are moving to Lemmy, they might not fully understand all the rules you’re trying to enforce.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          This is A. Good. Point.

          If i actually lose my mind and agree to mod this sub in a few months i’m saving this so i can come back to it, I have to look up how to reverse image search every damn time. And one of my first jobs was working IT building computers and programming bullshit dammit I’m not completely tech naive, just stuck in windows 7 because fuck you microsoft.

          anyways, thank you Rusty, I am making you Honorary Something. Whatever it is, whenever we think of it, you are it. That was a great idea.

          • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            There’s a great addon for Firefox, ‘Search by Image’, which can open reverse search engines straight from the context menu. Not very useful for those who aren’t chronically online, of course.

            Also, of all the search engines, Yandex is great at finding larger image sizes which are typically the originals (or upscales or poor crops). Afaik Tineye stopped updating years ago.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are there ways this could be implemented though that would not punish people who accidentally posted the wrong one though. You have a good idea, but we also have very few contributors on Lemmy and we don’t want to discourage that either.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          i mean we don’t have to make it a bannable offense, we just have to say “hey, go find the original if you can”. it’s a pretty relaxed community right?

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Unlike Reddit, it’s possible to edit the link a post links to after the fact, so it’s possible to swap in an uncropped link later instead of just removing the post.

          • ViperActual@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            This is the key. If someone shares something that may have the attribution missing or is too jpg, the post link can be edited to the better version.

            If users are posting too many comics that are missing attribution without following through to update post links to versions with them, then they’ll get the book thrown at them and won’t be allowed to post anymore.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’d be in favor of that. Not an instant ban rule but more of a “No link provided, please use TinEye or something to find the original and update your post”

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Images with the creator’s name cropped shouldn’t be shared anyway, plus they’re usually deep-fried and look like a blurry mess. People should be looking for originals to replace the crappy quality ones.

      • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, woulda-coulda-shoulda. It’s nice that people are willing to make suggestions and discuss the issue, but in cases like this, it actually needs someone to join the mod team here and then apply their vigilance on an ongoing basis towards stuff that broke the rules.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There are some good suggestions in the comments, like providing a link on how to reverse image search to the sidebar to make it easier to find originals. It would be best if it were something that was encouraged rather than strictly enforced.

          • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            For Firefox, there’s a super-handy extension that lets you right-click on an image and then gives you a choice of eight different services (or all of them) to reverse-image search. I use it all the time.

            Regardless, even going in the low-maintenance ‘suggestion, not a hard guideline’ route would require an active mod here to at the very least add the suggestion to the sidebar. Currently, there isn’t one, seemingly. This gets in to sort of a Meta issue about communities that get abandoned to some extent. It’s a real problem across the Fediverse, and I don’t believe enough collective focus is happening to deal with the issue.

            If you look at this thread, it’s full of people saying, “yeah, let’s do this!” and “cool, sounds good!” but nobody in a position to act is effectively listening. This is what it looks like when there’s a bunch of chatter and nothing actually happens, sort of like a loud protest that doesn’t actually change anything.

            • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah, if there’s no active mod it’s a non-starter. But people don’t have any reason to know that’s the case. Considering how relatively big this community is (for Lemmy) it’s impressive it functions without a human mod as well as it does.

  • Zikeji@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would say it’ll catch people who find a comic already stripped of attribution and want to reshare it, but that’s fine - the onus of fixing that / properly sourcing it should be on the one (re)sharing it.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    honestly this is mostly because i’m about to bike out and help my comic book buddy with his taxes. but c’mon people, be respectful to the artists.

  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Don’t know if I get a vote here, but I am strongly in favour — especially as you’ve said that it’s not necessarily going to be a bannable offence. I think that rules can serve as a valuable statement of intention — like virtue signalling, except without the negative connotations of that term