Do you host your own ML / AI / LLM? What do you use, and what do you use it for?

  • dfgxx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I ran through lmstudio because it really eazy, I ran some kind of qwen 3.6 27b imatrix neo code DI, it is the best local model for coding I tried, I think it can be better than some cloud model

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
    LTS Long Term Support software version
    SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access

    3 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 3 acronyms.

    [Thread #27 for this comm, first seen 25th Jun 2026, 15:40] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I prefer my critical faculties completely intact and un-altered, thank you very much.
    I do not require or desire a 400 watt bullshit-artist yes-man or vulnerability coder cooking my GPU.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Running qwen3.6 27b through llama.cpp.

    It’s about as capable as sonnet 3.5.

    I use it for light scripting, but real coding is done by cloud models.

    I’m also using it as the brain for my Hermes agent. It sends me digests of news, subreddits, chats that I’d like to read but don’t have time for. It does a great job researching things on the web for me, too.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Do you mean Sonnet 4.5?

      I don’t have the rig to run it at real speeds but I’ve played with it over API. Seems pretty good.

      • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        No, it needs a lot more babysitting than 4.5 does. 3.5 was on the same level of mistakes, at least on the quants I have to use.

  • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Partially. I started with hosting my own llama3.2 + granite4 models using Ollama for my Home Assistant smart home and for general chat with OpenWebUI. I also run whisper for speech-to-text locally on my 1080 Ti GPU. I like the privacy and ownership of my self-hosted models, but I started to run into limitations with the small weights. So I built some tools that allow me to route traffic to larger models hosted on DeepInfra depending on my need. For example, to GLM/Kimi models for code reviews or for my custom harnesses or harder problems.

  • Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’ve played with it for Home Assistant integration, but I just dont have much interest in it, the whole thing is too inefficient at the moment, and the tiny models that can run in a few gigs of system ram on an ipgu or npu arent good enough in quality or speed to rely on.

    Hopefully some future generation micro-models will be more useful for the way I want to use it (aka , ultra light, no dedicated hardware etc.), but for now it’s a lot of compute resources, plus heat and energy for a gimmick.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Agreed. It will be ironic if 1.58B models (Microsoft) turns out to be the great white hope.

      I looked at the recent Steam stats (which is a GPU sample of convenience); the most common GPU size was 6GB. Meanwhile you probably need what…64GB unified memory or a 5090 to drive a decent model at a decent speed/context?

      There’s a real gap between the haves and the have nots and it’s widening.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    No. I still have no use for it and everything I use is automated without at a far lower footprint.

  • eodur@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I have a simple slow model running on CPU in my cluster for karakeep. I’ve tried running a variety of models on my 7900XT but even with 16GB their performance just isn’t there. My new work m5 Mac book with 48GB of ram is the first time I’ve seen usable performance for local models and it has been pretty impressive.

  • Steve@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I recently gave it a try with qwen3.5 and deepseek coder v2. I have a RTX3090 and these are the largest models that can run comfortably on it.

    Conclusion, they are both fucking useless. Free tier claude runs circles.

    • e0qdk@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      If you just pulled the default version of qwen3.5 from ollama’s repo you downloaded a mediocre one that only uses ~6GB.

      Check ollama show qwen3.5 and see if you get something like this in the result:

        Model
          architecture        qwen35    
          parameters          9.7B      
          context length      262144    
          embedding length    4096      
          quantization        Q4_K_M 
      

      This is the default version I got when I first tried using ollama without any experience. It worked, but it’s a heavily quantized, lower parameter version of the model – i.e. it’s pretty dumb – compared to what you can actually run on your hardware.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Did you serve them with ollama?

      It’s basically broken, if you did. Try the same models over API, and you’ll see what I mean.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          https://sleepingrobots.com/dreams/stop-using-ollama/

          And that’s not even all of it. Basically they break models in many ways, and they’re slimey Tech Bros.

          LM Studio is better, and easy.

          If you’re on Nvidia, and want to run optimally, I would use the ik_llama.cpp fork. On AMD, regular llama.cpp. On a Mac, use an MLX runner (Like LM Studio) with an MLX quant (ideally an MLX-DWQ quant).

          It’s all pretty technical, and… thats kinda the point. LLMs are just too performance sensitive and too finicky to not have a grasp of how they work. There is no “easy button” to run them without bad results, there can’t be.

          But if you don’t have time for that and just want to see if it’s worth it, I’d suggest self hosing your own UI, and trying the dirt cheap APIs of models you can theoretically run on your setup. This will give you a “best case” taste of what they’re capable of.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Oh, and I just saw you have a 3090.

          To get more specific, you can actually run way better models than Qwen 3.5 and Deepseek coder (both of which are very obsolete now). The best that’s practical depends on how much CPU RAM you have, but at the minimum you can do Qwen 3.6 27B, with a more optimal quant like ones here: https://huggingface.co/ubergarm/Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF/tree/main

          Or Gemma 31B QAT: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma-4-31B-it-qat-GGUF

          If you have 128GB CPU RAM, I can upload my custom MiMo 2.5 quant. That should “beat” the cheapest Claude, give or take.

          If you have 64GB, I’d suggest a quantization of Step 3.7.

          If you have 32GB or 48, I’m not sure. I’d need to look if any “small” MoE is actually better than Qwen 27B now.

  • robber@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I currently run Qwen3.6-27b on llama.cpp and use it via openwebui. Mostly, I use it for web research via tavily, to a lesser extent for coding and interactively learning about things that are new to me but common in training data (such as basic math or ML concepts).

  • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I run Handy with Parakeet for speech to text, and home assistant with Whiper for the same. Whisper+ on my phone.

    I think that counts. But I have more relevant and useful things to do on my hardware and no 2000€+ to get LLM-capable hardware 😂

  • e0qdk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I started running LLMs a couple months ago on my own hardware. I have a Framework Desktop that I ordered last year and also recently picked up a refurbished 24GB AMD RX 7900 XTX which I’m doing some performance testing against. The dGPU is much better for dense models, and slightly faster for MoE if I’m willing to run them at a lower quant – but uses more power and has annoying coil whine. The Framework Desktop uses ~100W under load, is quieter, and for the MoE models already runs them fast enough for most of my needs – so most of my LLM use happens on that system still.

    For software: I’m using ollama on the Framework currently, but I want to replace it with just using llama.cpp directly eventually. I’ve been using llama-cli for testing the dGPU. I wrote my own chat client to interact with ollama as well as a few other programs for specific tasks.

    I’ve been using the LLMs for a mix of research (both personal and professional), entertainment, practical coding tasks (mostly debugging and brainstorming, plus a bit of UI prototyping, automatic generation of sequence diagrams for documentation, and light scripting), as well as automation of tedious tasks.

    As an example of the latter, people often send me requests to prepare data sets by email but don’t specify the sources they want precisely so I have to go match the name against the real name in our archives; LLMs are great for mapping the imperfect name – with typos, missing prefixes, incorrect addition of spaces, addition/removal of hyphens, etc. – to the exact name I actually need to pull the data off disk when given a lookup table to compare against.

    As far as models go, I’m mostly using various Qwen 3.6 and Gemma4 variants. I have multiple versions of each for different purposes. llmfan46’s uncensored Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B @ Q6_K (from Hugging Face) is my default model currently.

  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Yes, llama-swap and I use it for home assistant text-gen notifications, basic coding tasks, etc

    If anyone here self-hosts definitely check out llama-swap as it has some nifty features for hotswapping LLMs, image generation models and voice models.

  • alexquiniou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m using anythingllm. It’s quite easy to setup and use. I’m impressed of the perf on comodity hardware.