• KiwiTB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Given how filthy the ISS is, I don’t know if I’d want to eat anything not nuked into oblivion.

      • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Imagine trying to clean it. You can’t whip out a mop. Showers, wash cycles etc are all no go. Not too mention experiments from plants, chemicals, drugs etc which create their own issues. In some ways it’s clean, but others not so much.

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Part of it is I don’t know how skin particles will act inside a space station. Are there static electricity forces that would make it stick to surfaces, or does it remain suspended in air until the filtration gets to it?

            • atomicorange@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Static electricity would definitely be a factor, but there’s probably pretty good air circulation and filtering. That combined with regular wipe downs of surfaces probably keeps dust under control.

              I know the moon missions in the past had a hell of a time dealing with lunar dust. It’s super fine and static was sticking it to everything.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Some poor soul has never watched Bill Nye the Science Guy… what has the world come too… D:

    • AJMaxwell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s a slight increase in the blood pressure in your upper body, and a small possibility of thrombosis, blood clots forming in your veins. But after 50+ years of space flight no one has had complications.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Veins are small so capillary action keeps things in order.

      With no gravity though you’ll have higher blood pressure to your head (and less to the legs)- it kinda makes astronauts faces a bit puffy. iirc this can slightly negatively affect vision long term.

      Most of your body processes are in a small enough space that capillary action overtakes gravity.

      • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        With no gravity though you’ll have higher blood pressure to your head (and less to the legs)

        So what you’re saying is they should alternate between upside down and right side up

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Technically if they did that fast enough the blood pressure on both would get higher, potentially MUCH higher.

  • Starya67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve just realised that because of my esophageal dysmotility I wouldn’t be able to eat in space.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      you could set the spaceship in rotating motion, sothat the centripetal forces push you outwards and create the impression of artificial gravity for you.

      besides, why does no spaceship seem to be doing this today, like, at all?

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The centripetal force is provided by your legs (and the spokes of the centrifuge)

        You’re looking for inertia or the fictitious force (which makes the calculations easier): centrifugal acceleration

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Cause we have lots of places to do science with gravity, its nice to have a place to do science without it.
        And hard to maintain the force without damaging the ship. We have small space stations and shuttles and they would need to rotate really fast to generate gravity similar to earth and that is taxing on the structure and you since your feet would have a lot more gravity than your head closer to the center of the circle.

        If you have seen project hail Mary that is why there is an extendable counter weight actually. It helps move the central point of the rotation further away from the astronaut and let’s it rotate slower and have more consistent force.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is this a writing prompt about being left behind on a dying earth because you’d starve on your voyage to Mars?

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think there was a science experiments book for kids that dared me to drink water upside down through a straw while hanging from monkey bars or something. It was meant to show how our body deliberately moves food towards the stomach instead of solely relying on gravity, but instead it showed that I my legs were too weak.

    A shame these experiments are deemed to dangerous nowadays and people have to show their ignorance online, simply because the new metal straws have pierced the brains of anyone who did them.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean I can totally see kids choking on water while doing this too. Yes muscles but I am sure gravity helps too.

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      because the new metal straws have pierced the brains of anyone who did them.

      I am confused by this, straws go in the mouth, if people are sticking them in their brains, they’re doing it wrong, or are you saying there is a crack team of assasins out there who’ve vowed to keep this knowledge secret in a particularly gruesome manner?

      • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I implied that I fell from the monkey bars, and since I was drinking through a straw, I fell head first onto my water glass with the straw in my mouth that was below me. A common misconception of metal straws is that they are dangerous and can pierce through the mouth into the brain.

        I guess I could specify where the glass is in the experiment.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          A common misconception of metal straws is that they are dangerous and can pierce through the mouth into the brain.

          I mean it depends on the diameter of the straw. If the straw is thin as a needle, i imagine it sure can. I mean it’s only about the pressure, not the total amount of force. And pressure is force per area, so if the cross-section area of the straw is small, it will generate enormous pressure and that can surely pierce your skull.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Right, why do we have that redundant swallowing mechanism? Did enough people choke while eating upside down to make a difference? Wait, this is from our ape-y ancestry?

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most water back in the day was at ground level, so if we could only rely on gravity we’d have had a hell of a time bending down to slurp it up.

    • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My guess it’s even older than that. My bullshitspiration is that peristalsis enabled more complex digestion when our quadruped ancestors needed more nutrition options.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        How about the fact that being a qaudruped is basically the body plan for mammals. Humans are the weird ones for standing upright and having our mouths be directly above our stomachs. Every other mammal has their stomach mostly parallel with the mouth while standing. In order for food to get to the stomach, you’d need some force moving the food sideways towards the stomach.