I fundamentally don’t understand being a script kiddie (scripts from other people) because my number two Pain Causing Learning Activity is using other peoples libraries (after University Writing Projects), but I share the want/need discrepancy between how much I want to learn and how much might be good for me if I just got started.
Are you going to diss every sin and every virtue?
Not smoking when you haven’t started is really easy, because it smells awful
Lowe’s
The 60hz hum that some things emit for some reason to do with AC
SATB
Attaque cerebrale
-90
+1 for not using the energy from the inconvenient truth for literal doomerism
no. that’s a cohorse girl.
I don’t know why some kinds of flavour taste bad in my opinion. I wouldn’t want to eat something that I’ve already tasted to taste bad, but I’m generally open to things I don’t know (unless they sound disgusting, which is mostly reserved to mold (cheese) and bugs that weren’t prepared abstractly enough, as opposed to shrimp for example.
Do you mean the literal belief-level acceptance of factual statements or emotional assessments (of the world without the viewer) that are wrong or worse than the world is, or something about how much agency the viewer has or where they should use it?
It feels like my understanding of “logic” as a “subject” is probably one big warm take: I think it is just a piece of maths and programming and maybe philosophy, because it exists in service of all the things that require similar rigor to maths. I’m too far removed from the 1920’s to understand why “the birth of mathematical logic” in Hilberts search for metaMathematical Maths Proofs, Gödel, etc. is called that. (it’s probably just a misleading name) Often it feels like people imply too big a distinction between maths and logic. Doing any maths, like solving a quadratic equation requires logic: Any of the common rewritings like adding to both sides are things where you know a logical implication from one equation to the next. Knowing an equation has two solutions means knowing a logical or between x = a and x = b. That makes me feel bad for early logicians as their ideas seemed to be boring for lack of applications.
Learning about math with your budddy
When I don’t have any
The Unsellable Elephant that thw other guy just got on his weird application survey question.
This doesn’t actually achieve much of what you want at all, but whatever.
Since Thumbnails/Titles make up the way in which you’ll be turned off by your feed, If you’re like me and don’t like being very subtly clickbaited at, I suggest Veritasium.
I knew GNU coreutils man pages were good because when my Ubuntu got uutils, they became less detailed. Even though they have even less of a reason to be changed than the C->Rust switch.
I get very motivated to program things in pointless sandboxes, like ComputerCraft, Fancade, Logo (programming language), Geometry Dash. This might train my brain and teach me some basic concepts like SoA vs AoS (fancade, but accidentally), network architecture (ComputerCraft), but I’m also not really sure what to do for relevant reality topics.
I also do codegolf.stackexchange.com which has some pretty cool challenges.