Donald Trump has announced he will run for president in 2028 during a rambling speech to the Washington press corps.
Trump was speaking at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner when he appeared to make the announcement.
I won three times, now I’m gonna do it again,” he said, while putting on a cap that read “Trump 2028″.
“I’m gonna do it again. It should be easy.”
He went on to add that he won in 2020 but the election was rigged.
The 80-year-old was met with a smattering of applause, but even he did not seem excited by the moment.
Over the dead body of every patriot that stands for the Constitution, which reads in pertinent part:
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice
-22nd Amendment
*Edit: Here’s the video of his announcement:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xyzWui2OX2I&t=2s&pp=2AECkAIB
He seem like he’s just joking to you?
You think he’s joking. You’re about to find that things are different now.
From that website…
wtf? plz, no. That idea needs to be shot down right now.
I seriously doubt that Hunter Biden is even remotely interested
He’s said he’s not.
granted, he can’t be worse than the asshole we currently have, but, like. that’s a very, very low standard. Positively subterranean.
Anyone who isnt backed by an organization hellbent on executing LGBT+, stripping away the rights of women and bringing back slavery for anyone not white is better.
Lemmy can fuck off with the purity crusade already. Its old hat.
Like real talk.
I would be a better president than trump. But I would still be a terrible president.
You can fuck off with that “you’ll take a bad candidate and like it or else” bullshit. It’s a hat older than lemmy.
Highly subterranean, that bar is in actual hell
You thinking what I’m thinking? First mole person president.
America will only vote for a moleMAN.
(Hans Moleman 2028)
Why does he look like Micheal Scott in that photo? Lol
Hmm. Why is an Australian news organization the only one reporting this…?
Because the US media loves him. And America is very, very, very low on actual journalists. I think we only have 25 now.
Cause he just did it, and its like midnight in the USA. Also, there’s a distinct possibility that SOME news organizations are owned by the same people who support Project 2025.
Cause he just did it, and its like midnight in the USA.
You think US media… went to bed?
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/07/24/us/trump-news/337d4884-6be7-533f-983c-438ad7e505c3
Trump has concluded his speech after about an hour. Weijia Jiang, retaking the microphone, offers compliments to Kaitlan Collins and Josh Dawsey, two award winners that Trump mocked in his remarks.
That was posted two hours ago.
Heres a US link.
Try it and see what happens
Can we get him arrested for “winning” 3x? Make him deny it publication to stay out of jail or something like that.
Is he just really losing it now?
losing it now?
dude he lost it a decade ago. he hasn’t seen it in ages, and he’s not even aware it’s been gone.
Don’t forget that he is only president NOW because we are already ignoring the constitution. Don’t act like breaking a different amendment is any different. We already lost our constitution and rule of law when we stopped enforcing them.
14th amendment - Section 3
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
He engaged in insurrection, Congress never voted to remove it, he is holding office NOW despite our constitution stating quite clearly he is ineligible.
Illegitimate president.
You can bullshit around the insurrection label, but the term limit is pretty cut and dry. Not going to stop them, but the ramp is how we got here.
Is it though? I’ve already seen arguments like “It only means two CONSECUTIVE terms” and other such bs arguments.
The thing is, if no one enforces a law then you have no law. You can write a rule on a piece of paper, but if you don’t follow it what does it actually mean?
Even without the consecutive terms bit that’s obvious nonsense there is a legitimate legal question that could potentially be used and legal. It’s not a new theory floated for Pedonald, it’s been an unsettled question since the passage of the 22nd Amendment. 22nd Amendment’s relevant bit is
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
By the most narrow, strict reading of the text it only prevents election, if they can find a way to become President without being elected such, there’s a reasonable read that 22 doesn’t trigger. 12th Amendment contains the text
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
Does ineligibility to be elected trigger the ineligible to the office clause? Could he run as VP with a loyal puppet who immediately steps down? Main legal opinion is “probably not”, but there’s enough wiggle room there that I wouldn’t trust the current corrupt Supreme Court not to side with him.
Exactly. Two big things at play with all this.
A. Legal loopholes and bizarre interpretations of wording. We see it every day, lawyers and politicians and the elites find the craziest ways to dodge the laws that bind your or I.
B. He ALREADY violates COUNTLESS laws and the constitution and the amendments and none of those are being enforced. He violated the 14th by inciting and enabling an insurrection, no consequences. He has committed treason with foreign powers, no consequences. He stole government documents and had them at his damn resort, no consequences. He committed election interference and fraud, no consequences. He diddled little children, no consequences. He’s committed non-stop grifts and scams and frauds with his status of PUBLIC OFFICE as president for personal gain at the expense of the country, no consequences. And no one even wants to read this far, but the list keeps going. Not a single REAL consequence yet, he’s captured all 3 branches of the government and has loyalists everywhere that are stopping any real actions against him, just like a classic mob crime boss.
So if laws can be dodged or interpreted differently and if the laws we do have simple aren’t being enforced then there literally is nothing preventing him from continuing on, and he can make up whatever scenario he wants to pacify his brain-dead-followers into believing it’s the “right thing to do”.
Hell, he could just say “the libs are trying to come get ya! I need to stay president to stop em!” And 77mil people would fall in line. Ugh.
You make good points.
Yeah, the Supreme Court finding that the President was exempt from that wording really shows you the how they are willing to jump through to take over the government.
I’m horrified but also morbidly curious to see what bullshit they’ll be coming up with next to let Trump continue to rule.
They can just declare “a term” to mean 10 years. Or say “the law means two CONSECUTIVE terms is the limit” or whatever they want.
If no one stops them or holds them accountable or enforces the law or constitution then what’s the point of having any laws?
Not that laws have ever been fairly enforced, but come on…
The supreme court is on his side
And that’s why they need to be abolished. It was obviously a bad idea, let’s try something else.
Im curious what the alternative to an ultimate judicial authority might look like?
Here’s what I think. There should be 11 of them, and on an 11 year cycle they should be directly elected by the people 1 per year, 11 year term, 1 term limit. They should be selected from a pool that is made up of high level judges in the country, and the members of that pool who decide to run for the position need to pass some sort of test by an independent board of constitutional scholars.
As the Supreme Court makes rulings, rulings that allow or affirm a right or action should be set in stone and no longer challengeable unless the entire panel of 11 judges unanimously decide that the issue needs to be reheard.
Something like this anyway, I’m sure there is more to consider but this is the general idea that I think would work.
That sounds interesting, especially your view on rulings being unchallengeable. Full disclosure im Canadian so our system has differences.
To me, the root cause of that tension really stems from what I view as an inappropriate use of the judicial as law writers. It’s politically convenient for elected officials to use the cover of some rulings to allow ambiguity to persist in the law.
I think the ultimate cause of this in the US system is the general consensus (which by my read is not the intention of the law) that your constitution is immutable. Rulings on constitutionality are especially important because your constitution is amended so infrequently.
But with any rulings, I think that they should actually be MORE ephemeral, not less, based on the amount of dissent between judges. If a ruling is 5-4, there is a strong argument that the underlying law is unclear. This type of split I think is better resolved by the demand that legislators update or amend the law to add clarity. Judges, as interpreters of the law, are useful in function as a type of “quality check”. A 5-4 ruling, I would argue, amounts to the judicial writing law in the absence of clarity.
A 9-0 ruling? Law is fine. 8-1, probably still pretty good.
Even on a 9-0, there is nothing STOPPING the legislative branch from re-writing law. It is thiers to write and rewrite.
I just think tight splits should trigger some mechanism which demands a law-based resolution to clear up the underlying ambiguity within a specified time frame.
I get why legislators were happy to avoid touching law about things like abortion and let SC rulings be thier cover… they’re elected. It is convenient and safe. But they’re not really doing thier jobs.
Anyhow, that’s my 0.02
The court should be made up of a rotating panel of judges, made up of judges from the district courts, or lower courts in general, so the judges themselves are also subject to the court’s rulings, rather than a few permanent power-hungry narcissists imperiously sitting above us all with no accountability.
Each judge must be part of the Supreme Court for a year or two at a time, call it a “detail,” then they go back to their normal job as a judge.
Ok, yeah, this sounds reasonable to me.
This is still describing an ultimate judicial authority (aka, a “Supreme court”) just one with an alternative formulation of the conditions for which one serves on the court.
Original guy seemed to imply just getting rid of it as a concept entirely.
That actually seems pretty practical.
Something more horizontal.
Jury duty, but for the judges too?
I hope not, I’m pretty convinced that jury duty is a bad idea because average citizens are very easily misled by legal professionals.
Then I hope you fuckers vote for Obama
I don’t think he would run
I suppose I should go renew my passport before it’s too late
new passports have trumps face on it
🤮
“The anniversary passports will be available only in person at the Washington Passport Agency for American citizens applying for a new identification document, while supplies last, according to the State Department.”
Imagine being so deep into the cult that you’d want this gasbag’s face on your passport.
🤮🤢
Small subset issued out of DC offices
sic semper tyranis
Why is this site acting like the joke he made at the correspondents dinner that happened months ago was a real announcement?
Also why are so many users pushing this narrative that he’s just testing the waters now? Where were you right after he made that announcement back then?
This seems more like a ragebait and distraction from the real political headlines and recent news.
The one months ago he was evacuated from because of that nutter
This appears to have been this week
If it’s a joke then he’s being Schrodinger’s arsehole
Sounds like you’re intentionally downplaying a constitutional crisis. The first one was interrupted by a gunman trying to save America. This rescheduled one was last night, where he announced his intention to run for a third term.
There has been a constitutional crisis for years, moron. This is a distraction and you are falling for it.
See I thought it was months ago and this had me scratching my head, thought I’d remembered wrong.
You didn’t lose your mind. It seems like some news media sites are being manipulated either by some shitty LLM or they are actually doing exactly what an LLM thinks is a good idea. There also seems to be some astroturfing or bot seeding going on too because a lot of the posters and commenters with their “outrage” are the same morons recycling old ragebait content.
The one in April was cancelled before Trump spoke because an armed person charged the security checkpoint in the hotel. It was rescheduled. The rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Dinner took place on Friday, July 24, 2026, at the Waldorf Astoria in Washington, D.C… Trump attended and delivered a lengthy, hourlong speech.
After checking my calendar, I can confirm that July 24th was in fact yesterday, meaning Trump gave this speech less than 24 hours ago. No one’s astroturfing or being manipulated by a language model about this.
Ah that makes sense thanks!
It’s weird how I get a batch of similar replies around the same time.
you made a dumb comment and several people corrected you.
Except that there are more comments who agree with me. Nice try.
There isn’t. You’re wrong. You’re either a real person who denies reality which is fucking terrifying, or you’re purposefully and maliciously trying to seed disinformation. Either way get the fuck off the internet.
huh, you’re a bit of a loser, aren’t chya?
Good Lord. If trump looked any more like roadkill, he’d have to fight to keep RFK Jr from trying to eat him. He looks like absolute dogshit. I didn’t think it was possible for somebody to look worse than Steve Bannon, and to be fair it’s really fucking close, but trump does manage to look like a slightly worse, bloated corpse here.
But he’s also a shitty president and a shitty person. Fuck trump. I can’t wait to open my bottle of bourbon when it happens.
RFK: Oh look!, I need to remove his penis for later. … wait, where is the penis? I should be here somewhere!
The morbidly obese fucktwit with a shitty spray tan and a flappy vagina on his neck thinks he can mock other people’s physical appearances. The irony is fucking rich.
This man has pulmonary edema. I’ve heard that voice before. If fluid is building up in his lungs, and it sure sounds like it is, he’s not going to survive to run again. The best medical care in the world won’t fix that. Just, slow it down.
I lost a cat that way. It sucked, they seemed confused and scared and in pain. So, you know, fingers crossed.
It’s official. He’s going for the Putin-esque “democracy”…a dictatorship where you beat the crap out of people at the polls for voting opposition.
No way he wins again unless he cheats
Pretty sure cheating is the plan. The only way he does business.
You mean like how he cheated this time and won? Yeah he’s gonna get a third term, cause who’s gonna stop him?
This is my theory: 1. Trump will try to declare a national emergency at the end of September or early October in order to stop the midterms from happening due to the ongoing “conflict” with Iran or any other geopolitical situation that he has caused himself. 2. The midterms will still take place, although it will be heavily scrutinized by the right with the possibility of violence toward people on the left on election day. 3. The midterms will heavily favor the Democrats leading to a total wipeout for Republicans in all states as a result the Republicans will cry foul and that they were cheated, causing immediate January 6 style riots all over the country and possibly even the capital again. 4. Regardless of the results of the midterms, Trump will use their results too justify him running in 2028 and at the beginning of next year he will do everything in his power to get the Supreme Court and anybody else to stand behind his presidential run and next summer, he will immediately pivot into campaigning. 5. While I do believe it is over for Trump and the Republicans, there’s always that small what if. If he manages to stay alive until 2028 I have that saddening feeling that there is a very good possibility he could win again. I will happily eat my own words on all of this, after it’s just a theory…stay safe and informed everyone.
