De facto support. If there’s a conflict and the West is on one side, then if you oppose the side the West is fighting you are supporting the West. There’s no secret third way that lets you keep your hands clean. You have to pick a side, and you have picked the West’s side in Ukraine.
I guess this community doesn’t want to talk about that, though, so my comment was removed.
i support the working people. sometimes as an expedient that means a small degree of support of national entities, but the most important thing is the freedom of the people.
Funny you think criticism of russian propaganda equates to support for the west
De facto support. If there’s a conflict and the West is on one side, then if you oppose the side the West is fighting you are supporting the West. There’s no secret third way that lets you keep your hands clean. You have to pick a side, and you have picked the West’s side in Ukraine.
I guess this community doesn’t want to talk about that, though, so my comment was removed.
An incredible false dichotomy you presented there. Whatever you need to tell yourself i guess
Its not a false dichotomy you’re just spineless
I can be against the Russian invasion of Ukraine AND be against the U.S.'s attacks on Iran. Insane you think that isn’t an option.
Keep name calling on the internet tho, love it when people do that cuz it means they have nothing else :D
It’s a spineless option, you’re doing state department volunteer work and you should be ashamed
Seriously. I support both Ukraine and Iran in their wars.
i support the working people. sometimes as an expedient that means a small degree of support of national entities, but the most important thing is the freedom of the people.
Like, just rhetorically? Or are you jet-setting between the two battlefronts?
Definitely the latter.
That explains the hammock.