This is why gamers will continue to be screwed by the industry.

  • blackberry28@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Kinda ironic how people say we live in a cost of living crisis but then people also have always money at hand to throw it out the window for top level consumerism stuff. People have no self-constraint, do they

    • raze2012@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      the answer to your question is “K-shaped Economy”. Lot of people doing this are in fact doing way better than they were 4 years ago. Some of them are indeed taking out more debt to do this, but most haven’t felt the pain of this modern economy.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Guessing one of two factors, or a combination.

      • People seek escapism in hard times. 1930’s America was going through the Great Depression, but it was also the start of the Golden Age of Hollywood. People still turned out to go to the movies despite the bread lines and poverty. And people will still buy games if they can squeeze it in the budget, even if there are maybe more “responsible” purchases they could make.

      • GTA players probably don’t buy as many games. There are gamers who will engage with the medium across dozens of titles catering to various interests. And then there are “gamers” whose entire scope of gaming exclusively covers some combination of FIFA, Call of Duty, and Grand Theft Auto. When you only buy 1 or 2 games a year, sinking $100 on each doesn’t seem as unreasonable as buying 10 games per year at $40.

      • OrgunDonor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Also to add on to this, while we are in a cost of living crisis, that doesn’t mean people can’t save money towards purchases like this either. If you started putting back 5 or 10 a month since it was announced you’d have plenty saved, especially with the delays.

        I don’t think it’s a good idea considering we haven’t seen anything yet, but I am not their audience.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s because games are cheap compared to many alternatives that people would use to entertain themselves. They are one of the cheapest forms of entertainment when you consider how much time people spend interacting with them. An Uber and a night at a bar, or a dinner for two at a steakhouse could cost more.

      I’m not very consumerist, but grew up poor by US standards (and am honestly on my way back). A lot of people seem to want at least some nice things. Sneakers, nice clothes, nails, hair; whatever they’re into. I think it helps distract them, or gives them something to look forward to. Part of it may also be that society seems to conflate a persons worth with their income and possessions, and that has been internalized.

      • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’m pretty sure there was a study done that found that people with lower incomes tend to spend their extra money on experiences and such (tattoos, games, etc.) rather than save and invest. And they do that bc they figure they aren’t gonna have the money for long so might as well do something enjoyable with the money when they do have some extra. Whereas people who have higher incomes often have some extra money, so they can make plans and invest with the expectation that they will have more extra money later

        • sobchak@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah, that’s my experience. I think there’s a kind of anxiety that if they don’t spend it now, some unexpected expense may come along where they’ll have to spend it on that. When unexpected expenses are required, they have to borrow/hustle/pawn/pick up another shift/etc. A lot of people couldn’t even balance a budget if they tried (i.e. they don’t have enough income to cover both expected and “unexpected” expenses).

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah. Not be all “told-you-so” but I saw people on reddit talking about how Rockstar have screwed themselves by not doing physical disks and how pricing it so high is going to ruin them and I was thinking “Oh shut up, you’re all going to buy it.” I guarantee when it does eventually release all you’ll see on reddit for weeks is people talking about how awesome it is.

  • afaix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    It makes sense though, people who would preorder a game several months before it comes out would be big enough fans to get the expensive edition. Regular people are not buying any game before launch, expensive or not

      • afaix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        No, that’s true, but it makes sense that people who already do a ridiculous thing would also choose a more ridiculous option available

  • DrPop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m going to wait for it to come out and PC. Also I want to know how long the si gle player campaign is before purchasing it.

    • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I also want to see what DRM they sneak in, how much micro transactions and subscriptions they add, and whatever other evils they think of.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Since GTA San Andreas they’ve been a pretty consistent 20-30 hours if you don’t feel like you have to get 100%.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      This article is literally worthless without hard numbers. “Exceeding expectations” could be 20 people buying it instead of 10. “More people” could be 2 people. It’s all meaningless bullshit.

  • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I think it’s pretty cool that I can go, “Oh are you excited for GTA6?” And their answer helps me know if theyre worth my time to talk to.