yeaaa but I didnt make the Claim god exist, I ask why is the proof he doesnt exist. and he try to throw the burden of proof at me and treated it as a answer. So that’s a logical fallacy
You begin with the assumption that a God to be disproved exists. That’s where you went wrong. You decided to believe the God claim without evidence to back it up in the first place.
Asking for evidence against the existence of something is beginning with the assumption that thing exists to be disproven. That’s why everyone is asking what evidence there is FOR the existence of God. There isn’t any proof, so there’s no reason to assume a God exists, and thus there is nothing to dis-prove.
Asking to prove a negative is also a fallacy. But to answer the question, there isn’t proof of there not being any of the gods proposes throughout human history. To use the reasoning you’re trying to force us into, they must all be true. Except that’s ridiculous.
You might chime in with “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”, and that is correct. So we can’t say for sure (prove) that any of these gods exist. We await the presentation of evidence of existence that will get us out of this impasse you’ve put the argument in. It shouldn’t be difficult, if any of them exist.
you theoretically can prove a negative and is not considered a logical fallacy, and I am sure a reasonable and rational being can prove their objective claims with better objective evidence rather than give me nothing
That’s not a proof it doesn’t exist though. See, you fell into the trap you tried to catch us in.
I can say the same thing, if I look for certain evidence that whatever god in question should have and don’t find it, then the likelihood of that existence decreases. But of course each god has their own characteristics, which is why we asked you to clarify a god to question.
but it would theoretically exist? a record of the entire orbital ring of jupiter that a teapot would inhabit would be a theoretically existing object if it was created
yeaaa but I didnt make the Claim god exist, I ask why is the proof he doesnt exist. and he try to throw the burden of proof at me and treated it as a answer. So that’s a logical fallacy
That’s a complete misunderstanding of how burden of proof works.
Why do you believe I didn’t bang your mom?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
Atheists deny God’s existence. You say God exists. Yes, the burden of proof does indeed rest with you and not they. Get over it.
when did I say god exists??? I merely ask what evidence is there that he didnt??? wtf you mean???
You begin with the assumption that a God to be disproved exists. That’s where you went wrong. You decided to believe the God claim without evidence to back it up in the first place.
when did i state that god exist?
I didn’t say you stated it. It is the assumption with which you began this argument.
my assumption??? I think you mean your assumption. cause I didnt state God exist
Asking for evidence against the existence of something is beginning with the assumption that thing exists to be disproven. That’s why everyone is asking what evidence there is FOR the existence of God. There isn’t any proof, so there’s no reason to assume a God exists, and thus there is nothing to dis-prove.
Damn bro, you got em. Atheist is now illegal. Please let the pope know it.
Asking to prove a negative is also a fallacy. But to answer the question, there isn’t proof of there not being any of the gods proposes throughout human history. To use the reasoning you’re trying to force us into, they must all be true. Except that’s ridiculous.
You might chime in with “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”, and that is correct. So we can’t say for sure (prove) that any of these gods exist. We await the presentation of evidence of existence that will get us out of this impasse you’ve put the argument in. It shouldn’t be difficult, if any of them exist.
you theoretically can prove a negative and is not considered a logical fallacy, and I am sure a reasonable and rational being can prove their objective claims with better objective evidence rather than give me nothing
Prove there isn’t a teapot orbiting around Jupiter right now.
that is theoretically possible, you just have to look around the orbit area of Jupiter and where the teapot will orbit given its mass and weight
That’s not a proof it doesn’t exist though. See, you fell into the trap you tried to catch us in.
I can say the same thing, if I look for certain evidence that whatever god in question should have and don’t find it, then the likelihood of that existence decreases. But of course each god has their own characteristics, which is why we asked you to clarify a god to question.
but it would theoretically exist? a record of the entire orbital ring of jupiter that a teapot would inhabit would be a theoretically existing object if it was created