• Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    We need a revolution to undo the damage of this administration. Democrats aren’t going to do shit and they’re all owned by the AIPAC Uniparty. This administration has been devastating to our future. Heads need to roll and I haven’t heard any democrats running on real accountability and a hard line against Israel

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Trump white house just posted " 2 kings" and these people still trying to pass fake bills?

    The people of the US need to woke up before it is too late if they want their democracy back, otherwise they can accept the new kingdom.

    I am not sure what he will call it, maybe just Trump

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      these people still trying to pass fake bills?

      Telling voters what to expect, if voters give Democrats power, is not “fake bills”. What do you want, for Democrats to not tell voters what they would pass, if given power?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Telling voters what to expect, if voters give Democrats power

        After decades of lies, you’ll have to excuse the skepticism of people who have been paying attention.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          They will be talking about this bill being shut down by Republicans for the next 20 years. They will talk about how improper it would be to reintroduce the bill after it was voted down. If they are ever in power they will point to this failed bill whenever the min wage comes up. They know that it will never pass, that’s why it’s being done now.

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Democrats have not had a filibuster-proof majority for almost 20 years.

          Sometimes I think Americans don’t know how democracy works. You can’t blame a party for not passing stuff, if you don’t give that party the power to pass stuff.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Democrats have not had a filibuster-proof majority for almost 20 years.

            Stop using the filibuster as an excuse for democrats blocking what you want blocked. They could have ended the filibuster for good with a simple majority any time they had one.

            Sometimes I think Americans don’t know how democracy works.

            Sometimes I wish the genocide wing could come up with a new way to gaslight people who say things they don’t want to hear.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Sometimes I think Americans don’t know how democracy works.

            As not an american I am almost certain you don’t know how a real democracy works. A two party system is not democratic and majority are not healthy long term, if you want proof look at the us and the uk more recently. Coalitions are common and more democratic the world over.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      any other bill then to solve the current crises, they are banking on the problems snowballing so they get elected over the gop. it was the same thing senator warren/kloubacher did a useless “flag lesgislation”

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    This is one of those ask for 100 so you can negotiate down to 50 kind of things isn’t it? Or just a pretend attempt to look good when it’s obviously rejected.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    The min wage at the national level really doesn’t make sense. For some places it is too high, and for other too low. There is just no right answer at that level. It should probably just be abolished. The only problem is that some red states would use that as an opportunity to further exploit their people. So there is just no winning here.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Letting states set standards for everything creates a competitive environment that pushes for a race to the bottom. Every state feels they need to cut taxes more and more (and degrade public services), add more gambling, reduce rules for corporate behavior on pollution, etc. A federal standard levels the playing field.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        That is a very good point. But then how do you account for the vast difference in cost of living across the country. There is just no single right answer for everyone.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          There is just no single right answer for everyone.

          Yes there is, its above 7.40 and likely about 15 to 20. To give an example in Canada the federal min wage is $15 loonies an hour, and like your states the cost of living varies wildly between provinces and territories. To help (its a lack luster help) we do generally give tax breaks and sometimes money to the more rural areas to off set the higher cost of goods (you guys do the same in Alaska fyi). To drag out such a silly, tired and dusty line of reasoning in light of the us not being special is a choice.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            How do you say that is the right answer? Someone living in NYC vs someone living in rural Iowa need different mins. 15 to 20 sounds about right for nyc. But in rural iowa that would be unreasonably high.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              Someone living in Vancouver vs someone living in Milo Alberta could also use different mins. But its a min and no that’s not high, americans are just too used to exploiting people.

              • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                22 days ago

                I don’t really know what it costs to live in Iowa. But if 15 to 20 is what is needed there, then it’s way too low for nyc. And since the population is concentrated in cities, that means it’s not helping most of the people who need it. There must be a better way.

                • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Yeah, market forces. The min is just that, a min. If someone can not live in a city with a wage under X then if places don’t offer at least X they should fail, but they don’t since we prop up the current system.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    How DARE they Show voters what to Expect if PROGRESSIVES win a Majority!

    -People who will DISAPPEAR after the Midterms!

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s a great move and these are bills that need to be introduced frequently by dems right now. When people say “Yeah, but what can they do”. This. This is what they can do. Introducing these messaging bills for republicans to vote again and then grand standing on how republicans won’t do anything to help the working class.

      But dems must follow through. Minimum wage is the prefect example of where they should follow through. Attach it to a budget bill and when the parliamentarian says “not allowed” tell them to F off and push it through anyways. Just as the republicans have already done several times since they took control. Or blow up the filibuster. Either is an acceptable act for when dems get power. But they must deliver.

      If dems operate like they did in Biden term 1 or Obama term 1, they’ll be sunk in 2032.

      • Tiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Pretty much. I’d love to see a party actually have balls. Ever when the Dems are in the majority they just circle jerk each other.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          We are fortunately seeing some of this with the gerrymandering bills. The absolute right messaging came from AOC when asked about the Virginia redistricting “We have a bill on the table to resolve this very problem but Republicans refuse to support it. If they hate this, they can feel free to vote to stop all gerrymandering”.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            gerrymandering likely will hurt GOP more than it helps them since they already area at the limit of doing it, and starts affect thier districts.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’ll believe it when I see it and maybe not even then because it’ll get struck down by the Supreme Court or something.

      Good. Things. Don’t. Happen.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Do you really think that wages are low because higher wages would make the businesses fail? Wages are low because businesses have no incentive to raise them in an employer’s market, that’s it. They make higher margins and keep the difference.

          • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Both cases are possible. Wages may be low because of surplus of working force on the market (hence no incentives to rise wages) or can be result of extremely low margins at the given industry.

            There can be tens of reasons why wages are poor, and rising minimum pay solves the issue only in some cases

            • iglou@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              Of course, there will be edge cases of industries that have not improved their margins over the years. But the fact that prices follow inflation, and wages do not, is enough information to generalise that businesses are just greedy as fuck.

        • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Most of the past history of raising minimum wage/payroll taxes/employee benefits has been immediate outcry by business groups over how all business is going to go bankrupt/the sky is falling followed by change that a year later has business chugging along mostly the same as it was prior to their catastrophizing. It’s not really surprising that employees who are able to spend more, spend more.

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    This is garbage. It appeals to a far left constituency while alienating the moderate left people who are just trying to make their small businesses work. There has got to be a compromise line between these two groups. This is not how you win elections.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        A livable wage increasing 3x is going to raise eyebrows…

        I’m not in US, but 3x people’s salary isn’t something feasible, you don’t just increase the lowest, as they now leaped past everyone else. EVERYONE will need increases.

        So now everything goes up in cost, you just killed the export economy and those who are out of a job? Get turbo fucked because benefits lag behind at best of times, but now they got higher prices to deal with with the money they already don’t have.

        Oh and people go and buy out the housing market before it rockets to the moon.

        This is a lemmy comment, figures are vague by design. It is a centrist (read left if you’re American) safe space, hence I’m here, but we don’t live in lala land…

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        According to the far right, it’s a far left issue. According to everyone else, it’s a center to center-right issue. There is no far-left in the US.

    • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      That’s a lot of words for “I’m selfish and don’t understand how people on low incomes tend to spend more money proportionately, thereby stimulating small businesses”

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Ehhhhhhhhhhh in my experience low income does not support small business.

        Maybe they would change habits if they made more but it’s unlikely. Habits change more by necessity.

        In reality we’d all see healthcare become $5k a month and car insurance at $500.

    • Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      If your business model doesnt allow payment of a living wage then your business deserves to fail

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      This is garbage.

      This is still less than some areas’ true living wage in this country. Look up essentially any city here, and you’ll find its living wage is often much higher than both the current minimum wage, the most frequently proposed $15 increase, and this new $25 increase.

      Minimum wages should be living wages, not the bare minimum to not starve unless you even temporarily lose your job and are now deemed ineligible to live.

      https://livingwage.mit.edu/

      It appeals to a far left constituency

      74% of Democrats (center-right), and 55% of voters overall (left, center, and right combined) support a minimum wage increase to $25/hour. This is not a fringe idea.

      https://www.onefairwage.org/research-reports/poll-testing-%2425-minimum-wage-in-competitive-congressional-districts

      while alienating the moderate left people who are just trying to make their small businesses work.

      When minimum wages rise, small businesses find it easier and cheaper to hire new employees, face less turnover, and are able to charge a high enough price to cover the newly increased cost without inflating prices faster than the minimum wage.

      Raising the minimum wage for everyone benefits individuals, small businesses, and the economy at large. It even reduces the high school dropout rate!

      https://news.berkeley.edu/2023/03/14/even-in-small-businesses-minimum-wage-hikes-dont-cause-job-losses-study-finds/

      This is not how you win elections.

      Pushing a broadly popular issue relating to affordability at a time when economic uncertainty is around the highest it’s ever been is an incredibly good strategy to win elections.

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      If your small business fails because you can’t pay you employees enough to live off of, that’s a problem with your business model. The problem with small businesses is that the people starting them have no idea what they’re doing.

        • Sabin10@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          I live in a country with reasonable minimum wage and small businesses are doing fine. My city (5 million people) only has 5 Walmart’s while while American cities with half the population (I’ll use Houston for example) have 24. Low wages are integral to Walmart’s business model, not in opposition to it.

    • polariscap@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I might be wrong but I don’t think this actually pleases “far left” — far left prefers maximums / taxing billionaires rather than just raising the minimum without any regulations to keep costs from rising indefinitely

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Pretty sure the far left doesn’t believe in currency or private ownership of goods at all. The far left are communists and anarchists who eschew capitalism entirely. The policies you’ve described are centre-left. The Overton Window in the US has shifted so far to the right that they don’t actually know what far left even means anymore.

        • polariscap@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Noted - good point! I guess I meant ‘further left’ than whatever “far left “ boogeyman the original commenter had in their head.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      The moderate left business owners? WTF?

      Raising the minimum wage is far left?

      What even is this?

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      This is already a compromise. The far left answer to small business owners is to expropriate your capital and force you to get a job like everyone else.

      Besides that, workers outnumber business owners 170.7 million to 36.2 million. You’re a really tiny voting bloc and most of you vote Republican in every election anyway, so who cares what you think?

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’m far left with a small business.

      Yea this $25 an hour would ensure I’d remain a slave and the few jobs I can afford to offer (which are actually fun and in the arts) would all just be me until i keeled over and died paintbrush in hand.

      I don’t get fucking paid $25 an hour right now and I pay myself.

      Or i could close up shop and work at Walmart like everyone else. Then no one will have anyone or anything to ever see again in America that’s not a major public corp.

      The answer is to redistribute that wealth those corps stole from us.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        If you can’t run a business that pays you $25 an hour, it’s not a viable business. Work a job that pays and do the art you enjoy for the love of it.

  • menas@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Dozen of workplace burn by the workers -> even shithead thinks to raise wages

    Direct action pay cash

      • menas@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        you know that the whole world do not speak English right ? So you understand that we are making effort to adapt to the hegemony of yours ?

        The least you can do is being respectful. Are my sentences long enough ?

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I’m not trying to be a negative Nancy here, but I gotta say, the fact that shit like this has NEVER in my lifetime been introduced when the Democratic Party actually has control of anything is pretty fucking telling.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      im fine with this kind of theater. I would prefer tax bills to recover tax dodges but im not going to nope out on this by writing it off as theater. this timeline has a lot worse things than attempts to raised the minimum wage

    • Serinus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Do you think this is gonna pass? I’m not sure what you expect here.

      If Dems get 56% of seats, this’ll likely pass. (51% isn’t enough because Fetterman is nearly useless).

      For some reason people here really want to focus on the few potential holdouts rather than the 50% or more of Republicans who are the real reason this won’t pass.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        $25 would destroy any ability for most small businesses to ever get larger or going at all.

        I’m basically dying a slave holding a paintbrush in that timeline or raising prices 5x at least. $2k a month for employee health insurance. $25 an hour. Kiss literally everything that isn’t a major corp goodbye!

        What needs to happen is redistributing that wealth those corps stole from us.

        • Serinus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Maybe we should do universal healthcare too. That would help them.

          I’m not one of those anarchists that thinks nobody needs to work, but I think universal healthcare, an actual living minimum wage, and a 32-36 hour work week are all achievable.

          • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Universal Healthcare definitely is achievable but it requires a lot of tax money.

            Right now US total taxation level is ~30%. If you want EU style safety net on you, then expect 45-50%

            • Serinus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              Sure is a good thing we don’t currently count healthcare costs as taxes, or that’d look a lot different. Did you know most employers spend more on your healthcare than you do?

              Whatever you call it, it would be nice to have more take home pay.

                • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Because healthcare is not a kind of “market”, it doesn’t lend itself well to the ideals of capitalism. You aren’t going to go shopping around for hospitals while you are bleeding out in the back of an ambulance.

                  The congressional budget office even agrees that Medicare for all will save the government money, because it will eliminate the bureaucracy put in place to fleece money out of patients.

          • coaxil@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            I mean… Look at most other first world countries, you don’t need to think, it’s pretty reasonable shown it’s a thing

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Small businesses die out, often times, because people can’t afford to buy their stuff. One of the most basic signs of a good economy is small amounts changing hands often. Places like Walmart dominate the field because everyone is so poor they need to worry about saving single dollars and many cannot responsibly buy from local businesses. It’s literally a business strategy for Walmart, Amazon, etc. to undercut long enough to drive out small business and then they keep their employees too poor to fight back.

          You’re scared, and I get that, but it will be ok.

        • DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Small business’s definitely can afford to pay 25$ an hour. If they can’t, they dont deserve to be in businessm

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            yeah its not going to effect mom and pop shops if you are actually talking family run. It will make it more cautious in growing but if anything it will make it harder to have a business where the owner stops working. I would prefer more the thing where the highest compensation can’t be over 100x the lowest but im not going to quibble about the best way to do good things over bad things.

        • datavoid@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Not sure why this is getting down voted so hard. There are a ton of small businesses that have really small margins, just think about how many didn’t survive COVID. Any businesses that hire lots of low skill labourers would struggle to get off the ground.

          • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Yeah but then it’s not a good business. We could lower the minimum wage and more business plans become viable. But at some point it’s like I rather that single mom stay home with the kids than work for $7 an hour. It’s better for the economy and society to have people doing higher value stuff like raising kids than stickering boxes or something for minimum wage.

  • echo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Yay! Public masturbation instead of actually fucking doing something. What happened to impeaching the shit stain that keeps desecrating the constitution?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      What happened to impeaching the shit stain that keeps desecrating the constitution?

      A basic understanding of arithmetic and calendars…

      Who was saying wed impeach before midterms?

      Trying to do that, wouldn’t change anyone’s mind.

      Trying to do this, something most Americans want, forces Republicans and neoliberals to go against it, which hurts them in primaries/mid terms.

      If you don’t understand why people are doing something, just ask bro.

      That’s how we learn.

      • echo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        No… a basic understanding that they’re bought and paid for by the same billionaires and always follow their masters’ orders. There is no chance in hell that this will happen at all and meanwhile they’re changing the subject from Epstein and Iran to this. Fucking shills… every single one of them.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          There is no chance in hell that this will happen at all

          I know…

          I just explained why it still matters…

          There is no chance in hell that this will happen at all and meanwhile they’re changing the subject from Epstein and Iran to this

          1. In your mind people can care about more than one issue, but no more than two at once?

          2. As we’ve both said, Dems don’t have the votes. And I think we agree that not all Dems would vote with us if it came to it… So what do you think they can do about the other 2 issues? Wouldn’t we want to highlight as many of Republicans failures as possible in case not all voters agree about the other two?

          • echo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            They can get off of their collective fucking asses - every single one of them - and not say anything about anything except Epstein and the Iran war every single day, 24 hours per day and force the narrative to be that Trump is a pedophile and treason-weasel who should be treated as such. They could do almost anything that isn’t another version of sucking his balls.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              4 hours per day and force the narrative to be that Trump is a pedophile and treason-weasel who should be treated as such

              We tried that, it’s not enough…

              Dem voters need something to vote for.

              Even the DNC realized this over a year ago man…

              They could do almost anything that isn’t another version of sucking his balls.

              I mean, this isn’t sucking his balls…

              So we’re cool here now, right?

              You see the value in this?

          • Serinus@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            They complain that Dems don’t do anything. We say they don’t have the votes.

            Dems try to do something. They complain that Dems tried to do something.

            It’s almost like these people don’t really care what the Dems do or don’t do. It’s almost like their goal isn’t to improve the Democratic party, but that they have some other agenda.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              I mean…

              For the last 30-50 years, “the dnc is working against us” was valid…

              It’s just at no point does anyone teach people how our political system works. People know enough to know it’s stupid, but if it was possible to change the system from the outside, Bernie would have tried it by now. Or any of the people that keep trying would have succeeded by now.

              The only way to beat the system, is thru the system.

              Right now we have a level playing field at the party level, that’s fucking huge.

              And if that lets a progressive to the general and into the oval, they get to name the next DMC chair.

              The reason there’s such a big push against the DNC, is if progressives grab the reigns, we’ll hold them for decades. A constant cycle where progressives keep winning and keep controlling the party, decades (if ever) for Republicans to recover post trump.

              We’re so fucking close. And as much as people point out the bad parts of history repeating, we’re coming up on FDR. And that’s the real reason the rich are scared.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              Last time democrats had the majority, they were positively gleeful about blocking a wage increase.

              Why should anyone trust a party that doesn’t keep its promises?

              • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                23 days ago

                You’re right, you should definitely vote for the other party. They’ve proven time and time again just how good they are for the world.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  We’ve been through this. Stop interpreting criticism you would prefer to ignore as support for republicans.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      In fact, the impeachment resolutions have already been filed, and they are going to get just as far as this bill. So I don’t understand your complaint. For example.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        It wouldn’t be a major priority for me, either.

        Impeachment is a formal accusation of wrongdoing. It doesn’t remove the President from office.

        To remove a President, first you need to impeach him (simple majority in the House) and then you need to pass a vote to convict in the Senate, which requires a two-thirds supermajority.

        Trump was already impeached twice. On neither occasion was he convicted.

        As things stand, that Senate vote to convict will almost certainly fail. That will also almost certainly be the case even after the midterms.

        So the impeachment would act as something of a formal condemnation, but unless you’re really into symbolic gestures, it’s probably not the most-important thing. It doesn’t alter the balance of power or do much to Trump.

        What having a House majority will do is let the Democrats conduct investigations, and they probably should do that. If the Trump administration has been doing sufficiently-sketchy things that previously hadn’t been turned up and they turn it up, that might get enough votes in the Senate. But absent new information, impeachment isn’t going to have much real impact.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Lifting millions out of poverty wages isn’t “masturbation”. Wealth inequality can be traced to several problems within the country, and can be directly linked to several factors leading to the election of Trump.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          a DNC candidate would likely be someone like newsom, they will never budge on israel, and taxing billionaires, or healthcare.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          I hold no faith in the political process, so I’d be inclined to agree. The only way to ensure a living wage is to organize a union. We can’t wait for crumbs from the ruling class.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        What? Pretending like you are going to lift millions out of poverty sure is masturbatory. What road map do you envision that would allow this to happen. Do you think that they think they can pass this with a fascist regime in power? They know damn well it’s just fanfare.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          What road map do you envision

          I envision workers using this news as an organizing tool to form unions and bargain for higher than $25/hr, regardless of whether it happens.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Thank you! I was going crazy with every affordability discussion I heard only talking about cutting taxes and ways to lower costs here and there. Raising incomes fixes everything.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Democrats pretend to want to do the right thing when they’re not in power.

    When they’re in power, we get more than enough no votes to sink it and tonedeaf celebration of the girlboss energy of Sinema’s thumbs down.

  • E_coli42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Just do it on a per-State level. That way blue states can push their minimum wage up without having to worry about pandering to red states. There is a reason we are a federation if States.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I feel like some degree of mandatory minimum requirements established at the federal level that’s adjusted and implemented per state would be the best case scenario. Obviously minimum wage in California or Texas simply shouldn’t be the same as in Ohio or Wyoming. It really should be more reflective of cost of living of the specific location.

      But also, if you leave it completely up to the states with no mandates from the federal level, enjoy seeing $7.25/hr indefinitely in places like Texas.

      • E_coli42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        If that’s what they want to vote for, let them vote for a low minimum wage🤷‍♂️

        Blue States shouldn’t have to be held back because Red States are too busy fighting culture wars to tackle actual problems.

    • Legge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Technically yes, but the federal minimum wage right now is $7.25/hr (with a few exceptions). Even full-time at this amount is poverty level in most of the country, and many places now pay more than this anyway, so it doesn’t actually do much. In fact, now it seems like companies can use it as a way to suppress wages by saying look, we’re offering you $12/hr, which is almost double the minimum wage! In reality, that’s still insufficient to live anywhere by yourself in basically the entire country

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I make slightly more than that in East Europe, which is more or less average here. Granted, that’s only the “official” job, second or freelance jobs are quite popular here. While my day job is at factory, my nighttime job is mostly around computers (my very first job was webdev)

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        The minimum wage has been raised twice since 1997, for a total of $2.10. The last increase was in 2009. It now stands at $7.25 an hour.

        30 states have established their own Minimum Wage higher than the Federal minimum, but 20 states remain at the Federal minimum, all Red states, of course:

        • Alabama (No state law)
        • Georgia
        • Idaho
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana (No state law)
        • Mississippi (No state law)
        • New Hampshire
        • North Carolina
        • North Dakota
        • Oklahoma
        • Pennsylvania
        • South Carolina (No state law)
        • Tennessee (No state law)
        • Texas
        • Utah
        • Wisconsin
        • Wyoming