Please leave lemmy noone wants you here.
i’m not a fan of beep, but your comment is more disturbing then a user you can just block. Nobody should decide who can or shouldn’t be on fediverse.
lib
what does that mean?
It means they’re self identifying as a jackass.
no one wants you either but here we are.
No, I won’t.
enjoy my content.
Do not resist.😉
Your life must be so pathetic that you have to do this to feel alive. How many hours a day are you online? Do you go outside or have friends irl?
😄 how many do you?
This looks fake af somehow
Space travel denier?
No! I just think the picture looks odd.
It’s because of how bright the fire is.
Fire that bright, you wouldn’t be able to actually see any detail. It would be blinding.This launch was in broad daylight. The rocket looks like it’s in the dark next to how bright the fire is. But that’s full sun hitting the side of the rocket.
I think it’s because to get a shot like this, you need both to have a very fast shutter speed and also probably have a neutral density filter to get the details in the flames and not blow out the highlights. So either a shallow depth of field with a tight focus or very high ISO and they put it though a denoising filter. All of these things combined can make a photo look a bit odd
Hot
It’s a commonly held misconception that the engines are powered by fuel combustion, when in reality it achieves thrust via highly pressurized Natty Lite. That’s why they’re launched from Florida, after all.
Do they wait until later to ignite the middle engines, or can we just not see the flame?
Due to the exposure it’s mostly invisible. You can faintly see the back ones
There’s usually relatively little liquid fuel burnt until the solid fuel boosters have finished, as the rocket usually cannot handle full thrust from both liquid and solid fuel stages together
Weird you didn’t edit out the NASA logo. I thought you would consider this an ad
I don’t consider NASA logo an ad, obviously.
I consider you personally an ad thou.
You look like an actual clown
Your inconsistency is showing.
A logo its self isn’t an ad.
Putting a giant logo on the side of a rocket for everyone to see and associate with something awesome, is absolutely an ad.I painted my name in giant letters on the front of my house and that’s not an ad
Look at the comments above providing sorely needed context about what Steve is criticizing them for. OP is a complete jackass who actively removes credit from comics they post because they think it’s an “ad” for artists to watermark their work. (Which, technically, it is, just like the NASA logo here is technically advertising NASA; it’s just in the most benign way possible that nobody but a dipshit like them would complain about.)
Absolutely is. Brand marketing. The more people see your name, the more familiar it feels. Even if it’s just on a random house.
Just because my real name is “Freebeer” everyone always thinks I am trying to promote something 😥😥😥
obviously
Not obvious at all. NASA’s funding comes from elected officials, and their enduring popularity with the general public is a component of that. Works produced by the US federal government are in the public domain, so if anything, NASA was inviting you even more than usual to remove their logo.
NASAs government funding depends on their popularity. Putting their logo on the side of a giant rocket is absolutely a form of promotional marketing. Also known as an advertisement.
… Are you responding to the wrong comment here? Or just concurring?
Yep. I’ve been doing that a lot lately for some reason. Just a miss click or something.
Yeah it’s not an ad. If you took a picture of a Ferrari you wouldn’t edit out the badge, because its part of the design of the car. Who even cares, anyways? Its a fucking spaceship, not a blender. Nobody is going to be a customer of NASA
for context: https://lemmus.org/post/21295494
beep is removing artists’ names/signatures from comics they post and it turned them into a persona non grata on many Lemmy communities. That “ad” comment comes from a week long dispute
Bro thinks stealing art gives them the moral high ground? Damn, I wanna know what they’re smoking…
NASAs government funding depends on their popularity. Putting their logo on the side of a giant rocket is absolutely a form of promotional marketing. Also known as an advertisement.
I’m genuinely curious. Where do you draw the line? Why is an author’s signature in their comic an ad but NASA logo in their rocket is “obviously” not an ad?
So you admit you don’t know what an ad is. Lmao pathetic
Context: https://thelemmy.club/post/46819374
Lmfao this is wild
That is spectacular
I’m glad the humans are going back to the moon. They should do more things like that.
They’re just looking at it though. No stopping. Resembles my one and only American vacation.
That exposure, well done!
Damn that hydrogen burns clean
And releasing shitloads of polluting Dihydrogen Monoxide!
