• Beth@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I author those kinds of papers routinely for work unfortunately. Usually closer to 30-40 pages but there are graphs so I guess that takes a few pages off. But….yeah…

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not gonna feel any kind of sorry for an idiot that cannot imagine not needing a machine to do all of their thinking for them.

    That’s a literal real world NPC right there.

    And shit, that’s an insult to a fair number of NPCs, who have better writing, voice acting, and potentially GOAP driven tactics.

    Fuck, sometimes even better facial animations.

    • ReHomed@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Watching so many functioning adults and people alike just lobotomize themselves immediately when AI became a thing is just so fucking tragic

      • DokPsy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The CEO of one of my companies clients literally said they couldn’t do their job without Claude when we told him his PC was slowing down to the point of being unusable due to the desktop app and suggested he not use it

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is the prophecy foretold by our entire 20th/21st century concept of Zombies.

        Its just that the vector for mind obliteration is primarily digital, not biological or supernatural.

        It is the endpoint result of our laziness and preference for convenience.

        When the rat in the skinner box gets a button wired to its brain that releases dopamine, the rat just hits the button untill it dehydrates/starves to death.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m about halfway through my degree and haven’t used AI for any of it 🤷‍♂️ Including at least two 10 page papers and I don’t even know how many 3-5 page ones, lol. I have no intention of changing that either, why would I want to dilute my writing voice or my line of reasoning throughout the paper? Writing is thinking, there are so many things you think you understand well until you sit down and try to explain it. That’s the point, that’s the process of learning.

    If it was up to me I would accept a student doing a presentation instead of a final paper if they really struggled with writing, because I’ve seen professors do that and I think it teaches just as much (also it’s fun to watch people give presentations they’re enthusiastic about). But it has to be equivalent to the amount of writing you’d be doing, like 20 minutes to present 3-4 pages. But either way, AI isn’t going to teach you anything for either of those compared to doing the work yourself.

    • vrek@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I love this take. One suggestion I would make is also rake your knowledge and try to help someone earlier in their journey. Writing is great but you get no feedback immediately(you may get some later).

      When you explain something which you only have a surface knowledge of and the other person asks why… That’s teaches both of you alot.

    • binarytobis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I suspect in five years or so final exams will be a 1 on 1, face to face meeting with the teacher where they ask you some softball questions you should be able to answer easily if you did even some of the homework.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m in a field that decidedly does not value the written word beyond the minimum they need to understand and write emails, but I had to take a couple of writing classes in college.

      I had to write several 10+ page papers, including research papers (like actual research, not “do your own research” research) before LLMs existed and I’m so fucking thankful for it. Nearly every single day I have to read the shit my colleagues write, and it’s like they’ve never read a book in their entire lives. It’s honestly tragic.

      And this is a field full of ostensibly intelligent people.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh man, I asked Claude to summarize my commits and changes today, using the voice and structure of my usual daily updates.

      It was fucking awful.

      Claude spent 5 minutes on this then I had to review and edit anyway. I ended up spending 10 minutes writing down the what+why in a bullet list from scratch and it’s 100x clearer and better.

      The AI neither did a better job nor saved me time.

      I think you’re doing the right thing.

  • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “There’s no way you could write a 10 page paper without ChatGPT”

    Pulls out a novel

    Pulls out medical journal

    Pulls out documentation for home insurance

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve been seeing more and more tradies respond to customer enquiries with llm generated emails. AFAIC that instantly means you get shitlisted.

    If you can’t even write a fucking email you are not working on my house. This is supposed to be your field of expertise and you outsourced even talking about it to something using fucking reddit and facebook as sources

    • Loui@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      As far as some costumers are concerned talking to them is all we should do. As though they are our only costumers.

      No! We have shit to do! Being on the phone holding your hand all day doesn’t get us paid.

    • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Those big stacks of flat wood from the before fore?

      Heat many boilers to keep turbines spinning with those. The machine gods demand it

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Really? This shit made front page twice?

    You people do realize this is likely made-up ragebait, right? You really got energy for this?

    • You people do realize this is likely made-up ragebait, right?

      As someone currently in college (soon not to be as I am dumb), I believe it. This indeed is how many do assignments, and also study, thus fully trusting the correctness of the information.

      But it’s coming from both sides.
      Lecturer on programming class told us we can ask questions if we have some. Cool, I did.
      So I asked, got “That’s a good question, let’s find out.”, he typed out my question to Gemini, and read back the answer.
      This was an introductory class to C, and my question was if you can find how much memory was allocated with malloc. His answer was Gemini’s answer which was a concrete no.
      Stackoverflow however provided me with better information on the matter: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1281720 (possibly yes)

      Also, I’ve seen him ask and copy paste a number from Gemini. I think it was what a max value is for uint32_t.
      Putting 232-1 into a calculator? Nah, let’s use an inefficient non-deterministic calculator instead.
      Lastly, he added “AI is your most patient teacher”.

      He did the speaking part of lectures above average, but holy information sources…

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I watched a TA (teaching assistant) pull up their chatbot history when I challenged my DSA exam grades. I got about 17 points back. My grade went from high 60s to middle 80s.

        Also anectode: I personally know of 2 people that sit in the back during 60+ people exams and simply use their phones.

  • kastledlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember ripping off a ten pager in college the night before because you worked all week and procrastinated? I do

  • Evil Kitty@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nah your lying. People back than had AI programmed directly inside there head. Nowadays kids have to use external AI models.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What they mean is “I couldn’t write a 10-page paper without ChatGPT.” And because they have very limited imaginations, they can’t imagine other people being able to do something they can’t.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unironically, this. 👆

      Too many people can’t see beyond their own little bubble, and have a difficult time if someone challenges their myopic world view. e.g. I see this all too often in software development where developers will make their software “opinionated” (read: it does what they want it to do, and not what’s necessarily good for their users).

      I digress. 😅

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          In other words: you like opinionated software so long as they share your opinion. That’s an important distinction.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s hard to imagine not being opinionated, it’s all just whether the opinion agrees with yours or not.

            Drop down or radio button? It’s an opinion about which is better. Braces and semicolons or spaces and newlines? It’s an opinion about how to best format machine parsed stuff. Science fiction or fantasy being a better setting for your game, another opinion.

            To the extent something might pusue being “unopinionated”, I frequently find it tends to erode value. Refusing to pick a lane or even a default means the user has to do so much that the user might as well have done it themselves from scratch. Even in the attempt, they end up with opinionated implementation and documentation, as it’s just unavoidable.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean, ruff is an opnionated code formatter. I don’t always agree with it but I’m very happy I can shut down other people whining with “that’s just how ruff does it”.

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I agree on software to a point. You need some opinions. “everyone will use a mouse and keyboard, fuck controller users” is bad. But you need some direction to get things done “what system will this run on? Everything! So I’m expected to make a rts game similar to statcraft 2 able to be played on the switch? Yes! And controllable with dpad, joystick, mouse, keyboard, touchpad and a paraplegic wheelchair? Yes! Ok, I’ll need 20 years to write this, and I’ll quit in 4”

        Im exaggerating but there does need to limits. “this will be playable on Playstation 5” or “this will require a 2080 or better, we are not supporting a voodoo2 vfx card…”

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And because they have very limited imaginations, they can’t imagine other people being able to do something they can’t.

      Right wing “thought” in a nutshell right here too

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What they mean is “I couldn’t write a 10-page paper without ChatGPT.”

      We used to have a tradition in this country. A tradition of looking up some other shit people wrote and dumping it into our own lazy, English 101 term papers with the hopes that the graders wouldn’t notice.

      Are we really so fucking lazy, as a society, that we can’t even do plagarism properly anymore?

      • binarytobis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unironically, if you aren’t capable of restructuring and consolidating other people’s ideas into your own format, how many modern office jobs are you even qualified for?

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s okay. Chatgpt is taking those jobs too.

          I suggest we all get into plumbing. The potential for water damage makes robots less appealing there for the near future.

  • Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s strawman rage bait. You can say the same thing about sailing vs combustion engine shipping, programming via C on notepad vs modern development environments and languages, etc.

    The missing context is the time required when you know what you’re doing. And yeah sometimes walking is still faster than driving a car. But let’s not pretend we’re not seeing a major shift like industrialization or the internet. Both of which have fucked up society and the world in countless ways as much as it has benefited us.

    I can write a solid 10 page well-researched paper out of a library in two weeks. With the internet, I can write that same paper with even better research in one week. With AI tools, I can write that same paper with better readability, conciseness, and overall editing in a couple days.

    What’s the cost? Probably not pretty, but the deadline is a lot shorter than it used to be now. And that’s the reality most people will find themselves in now.

  • StopTech@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yup. This applies to every technology post-enlightenment technology. We didn’t need cars, we didn’t need the internet, we didn’t need phones, we didn’t need TV, we didn’t need X-rays, we didn’t need pharmaceuticals, we didn’t need automated production and we certainly don’t need anything to think for us.

  • Waterpumpee@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Back then, you’d find usable info on the web. Now everything is buried under centuries worth of AI slop read. Plus it was more accepted to have blind spots on your knowledge. Now everyone using AI raises some bars and the only sucker not using AI gets a worse grade.