• BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’d put money on China being able to pwn the USA with the click of a button. We know about salt typhoon, and there’s been documented backdoors in IoT devices and some Unitree bots. Imagine all the things we don’t know about. Especially regarding power generation and general aging infrastructure.

    • fanbois [he/him]@hexbear.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      An open conflict between the US and china would probably end with exactly zero winners and an uninhabitable glowing piece of rock orbiting the sun. Maybe the cockroaches can then find a better path to communism.

      • pineapple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I feel like nukes are more just showpieces than item that anyone actually considers using.

        • whosarlindo235@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Japan used to think that too

          Honestly i don’t think you are completely wrong. Most of the reason for having massive nuclear weapon inventory comes as a mean to dissuasion. However that doesn’t necessarily mean they will never be used, just suggests it would not be like the apocalyptic war everyone thinks.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            1st Iraq was a clear win, both militarily and strategically. 2nd Iraq and Libya were strategic victories because the real purpose was to maintain the petrodollar, which was attained.

            • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Actually the reason your government gave was to get the weapons of mass destruction from Saddam, which was proven to be a lie, so how did you win an illegal war based on fake goals?

              • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                You believe US when they state the war reasons and goals? Lol, lmao even. They achieved a real war goal of stopping Iraq and Libya from breaking dollar monopoly on oil sale.

                Also it’s not my government, my government was actually quite honest, they admitted they went there to bootlick USA and loot Iraq.

                • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Uhh no, I’m saying they didn’t win the war because they couldn’t meet their stated goals, I wouldn’t trust that country as far as I could throw it.

                  My bad for assuming, btw.

          • finnadrag@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Do you think Saddam’s government won? The US won the war with Iraq if not the war with the insurgency.

              • finnadrag@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                Ok so you can’t win a war if it wasn’t clean and easy? And since when has the publicly stated justification for a war ever had anything to do with who won? Lots of wars start with false justifications.

                • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Show me a reputable source that claims the US won the war. The 20 year war, of a superpower, VS a small middle eastern country.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    It is absolutely maddening to see American pundits defend every dumbshit, ruinous, genocidal policy over the last twenty years by pointing at China and claiming, “We had to show them we were the boss”.

    From AI to A-bombs, there’s nothing you can’t get away with by insisting “China Bad! This will stop them!”

    • axx@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s a very convenient go-to excuse. And as long as the American public keeps lapping it up, those in power will keep counting on it.

      • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        And not even the country’s, just that of a few old pedophiles trying to rape some life out of children in a vain attempt to feel youth again before the grave takes them

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    China and Iran are allies.

    If the US and China go to war Iran will close the strait to their enemies. And we’ve seen the US is impotent to that and overly reliant on oil.

    I think China just has to deal with a first strike from the US and then wait for an impotent United States to fall apart and starve.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I think your last point is pretty accurate. The US side has done a bunch of war games for a Taiwan invasion situation. In these games, the US side barely wins. To me, that’s evidence the US probably loses. All of the Chinese decision making is done by US military people that think like the US military. If the PLA acts differently, they could easily be in a better position. Also, the Chinese capabilities will be based on US intelligence. Unless the Pentagon knows everything about missile ranges, warhead sizes, magazine depth, aircraft speeds and ranges, etc, they won’t be able to anticipate a capability they didn’t know about.

      Probably most importantly, China has a vast industrial base and would be much closer to the fighting. All they really have to do is use up the US missile stockpiles and shoot down a few planes (probably while they’re just parked in Okinawa). Once the war becomes about who can manufacture more missiles and planes to replace losses, there’s no way the US will be able to keep up. If it becomes a protracted war, the US loses by default.

      Edit: also, I’m not so sure Iran would close the straight. But I don’t think it would matter because part of the US plans involve closing the Malaca straight to starve the Chinese of oil. They’ll do it themselves.

  • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    hey usa, china is building tons of high-speed rail. they’re the leaders in decarbonizing their energy mix. they’re building tons of housing to handle population growth. they’re financing infrastructure projects in the global south. why not try beating them at all that?

    no? just wars again? okay.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Even with more property rights. If you own a house and you don’t want to sell it when they want to build a new highway, they build the highway surrounding your house, instead of expropriating you like in western countries.

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    China couldn’t give a shit about supposed US deterrence.
    Henry knows that, he also knows that China receives the largest share of oil exports passing through the Strait of Hormuz, accounting for 37.7% of the trade route’s total volume.
    That is why they had their own blockade.

  • pticrix@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I think Americans should ban debate clubs. Clearly they’re only teaching how to create mental convolutions instead of creating sound arguments.

    • subverted_per@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Oh no, debate clubs are actually very good at teaching kids how to discern good information from bad, and how to make proper arguments with supporting evidence. Right wing media teaches gish gallop and never be wrong, it’s these two ideas that have taken over discourse.

      • pticrix@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I will have to take your word on that. Got to admit my opinion is based on a limited set of people I had the displeasure of interacting with.

    • sangeteria@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Americans should consider doing mathematical convolution instead. Very important for functional analysis with deep connections to the Laplace, and thus Fourier, transforms.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      Português
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Americans famously can’t hold more than one idea at time, if Trump shit his pants tomorrow the entire investigation of Epstein is gone.

      Please president, hold your shit!!!

    • cornishon@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yep, the Americans totally were on the verge of doing something about the Epstein files, but then that dastardly Trump figured out a way to distract them!

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    The US is basically a “this is good for bitcoin”, but as a country.

    Its slow, humiliating, public suicide is even more pathetic than great britain’s.

  • axx@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    How can people be so delusional?

    “When their salary depends on it” is a decent first answer.