• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Damn, it’s crazy that we let one guy decide these things. Seems like the kind of thing that should be determined by a large legislative body that holds the power over our nation’s budget and the ability to write laws. Weird we don’t have one of those.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Almost as if this one guy is just a figurehead for a larger political movement.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well one thing these last years have taught me is that the US president has way too much power.

    It was never an issue before because presidents didn’t test it, but this is insanity.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      The president largely doesn’t have too much power. Problem is the other two branches of government conceding theirs.

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      To be fair, in many ways the president doesn’t have the power. But Republicans in congress are complicit, so when he does incredibly illegal, batshit crazy stuff, none of the mechanisms to keep him in check function. Him being president is a big problem, but the real problem here is the complete abdication of responsibility by those meant to check him.

      • DasSkelett@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s definitely true, but I’d still say the president shouldn’t even have the power to issue such decrees. Many of these things wouldn’t even happen if the president would first have to convince the legislative body (even if controlled by his own party) to write a law. Reverting an already issued decree is harder than saying no beforehand, and politically much more delicate.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        To be fair, in many ways the president doesn’t have the power.

        Yeah. Want a minimum wage increase, legal cannabis, childcare, family leave, protecting Roe, protecting democracy itself, pursuing justice for January 6 or Epstein’s victims, and the president is conveniently powerless.

        Want to ignore the law to sell weapons for genocide and the president is fucking omnipotent.

        • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          He is de facto incredibly powerful, but he is de jure not. He’s only capable of doing those things because the checks and balances failed through the coordinated efforts of hundreds of Republican congressmen. Every heinous act that goes unchecked bears the implicit seal of approval of the entire Republican party. He could do many of the things you claim he’s powerless to do, too, but he doesn’t want to, and all the mechanisms meant to force him to have failed.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I was talking about the previous administration. I don’t expect anything good out of this one. And I was a fool to expect anything good out of the last one.

      • Johanno@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Which is what shocked me. I can understand that there are a few foul eggs in politics and if they take the wheel shits going down.

        But since his second term literally nobody did stop any illegal shit from him.

        The whole system is corrupt and broken. Nobody dares to defy the president even if they are supposed to!

        • sobchak@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t think it’s so much “fear” of defying the president as it is they’re getting what they want from him (white christo-fascism), and they’re getting bribed by the same people. Most of the Dems are also dependant on the same interests as well (not necessarily the white Christian-nationalist stuff, but the same money). The concentration of wealth has put far too much power into too few hands. These same people are heavily influencing politics and public opinion worldwide. Idk, how we get out of this mess; have to bring the entire global economic system to its knees; forcibly redistribute their wealth or make it worthless I guess.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          What is happening with this administration is exposing the great flaw of electoralism that anarchists and other leftists have been warning about for nearly a century.

          That if we do not restructure our society, our politics and our culture leave us manipulatable to where these corrupt individuals could systematically consolidate power and out themselves or their allies into positions of power.

          This is the result of not a decade but over a century of political and systemic manipulation by the owning-class.

          Living in the US during this time has radicalized me so much against the system.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Another 35000 people lose their job thanks to Trump. People who also prevent forest fires. But that has never been in issue in the US, right?

    Right?

    RIGHT?!?

  • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I mean. You have to give it to them. They are really going all in on destroying anything that actually made America great.

    I’m not sure if that was the original goal, or even the intent now, but even with how terrible this news is, if the goal is to systematically dismantle a country, these guys are very very good at it.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      The National Parks were literally the last thing that would entice me to travel to the US

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s like whoever is directing his actions just wants to twist the knife a bit. But there are so many evil fucks to choose from that it doesn’t really narrow it down. Could be a Putin “fuck the americans” thing, could be a Miller “fuck everybody” thing, who knows.

    • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      They’re running it like a business. Sell everything of value, bail when it crashes.

      • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I guess you are right. The staggering thing for me is the shear apathy required to do what they are doing. It’s revolting and frankly terrifying, but fascinating.

        There is a yet to be diagnosed mental illness involved here, for so many people to so callously trumpet and parade toward things that actively and directly hurt them as well, just to prove some imaginary point.

        It’s like psychopathy mixed with a side of Stockholm flavoured bias soup.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is so outrageous that I find it hard to believe. The cost of the entire US Forest Service must be minuscule, especially if you compare it to cost of waging unnecessary, illegal, and unethical wars all over the planet.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m sure this isn’t really about saving money. It’s about destroying the US Forest Service. That’s the direct goal.

      • kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        In a few years: “These unkempt forests are a real eyesore, what if we sell the land to private entities”

        • TachyonTele@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Within three years: “These unkempt forests…"

          They’re going to try and steal as much of it as possible while Taco is in charge

    • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is also the second time that he’s tried this. The first time was during his previous term, and though he was forced to reopen everything by the courts, the fact that he sold some of the federal land to (I think) oil companies was never acted upon, despite it being illegal to sell public land to corporate interests.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s actually $9B a year…which I wouldn’t call “minuscule” like PBS was.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The point is Trump will never do anything that isn’t for deeply personal reasons. And he would never do anything solely to save money on the budget, he doesn’t care about that at all. So either he does this out of pure spite, because it is a “liberal” thing, or more likely he does it because he has been bribed by whatever industries are eager to turn all that forest into shortsighted profit.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Fine. But calling 9 billion dollars, an amount of money most people can’t even fathom, “minuscule” is pretty stupid.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            In the federal budget context, that is literally a few dollars. It is super disingenuous to compare it to the budget of a single person.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Wildland Fire Management and the Wildfire Adjustment

        The largest share of FS appropriations goes to the WFM account. The WFM appropriation funds preparedness, or fire prevention, detection, equipment and training; wildfire suppression; and salaries and expenses.

        Overall, in FY2025, 51% of the agency’s discretionary appropriations, including supplemental appropriations, were provided for these two accounts (26% WFM, 25% wildfire adjustment).

        https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13101

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah this is more of a re-org than an elimination. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/03/climate/forest-service-research-stations.html

      Still seems like it might cause problems but it’s not the catastrophic change some people are making it out to be. And the Forest Service isn’t just a bunch of tree-hugging conservationists their mission is basically the sustainable exploitation of US forests. So for that reason they are very important to industry.

      • ooterness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s “just a reorg” where they shut down all the research labs (which can’t be moved because they’re located by the forests they study) and hand leadership to pro-logging lobbyists.

    • ritsku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s probably so they can destroy climate change research and distract people yet again from other atrocities. Oh and drill or whatever they want to do with the land.

  • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    President Javier Melei is a self described ancap and the inspiration behind DOGE. Wouldn’t surprise me if this is another attempt at shaping things by another libertarian group.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Since when is the President in charge of government agencies and their funding in any way?

    I guess they know what they are doing.

    Just kidding

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Weird legal theories. They propose that Congress authorizes spending, but does not impose it. Therefore because Article II Section 3 requires “the President to ensure laws are faithfully executed”, he then controls how the department functions (if it all, apparently) and if there is leftover money it reverts to the Treasury.

      • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        The us treats legal texts like it does the Bible. Always twisting it to mean whatever they want it to mean, while pretending it’s an absolute truth.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Shout out to my wife’s uncle, the nature photographer who loves hiking and nature and voted for this chode to stop the woke mind virus. How’s that going bud?

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Eh he is funneling money from everything he deems unnecessary (health, science, nature preservation, education, progressing human rights etc) to pockets of his buddies, Netanyahu and tech oligarchs.

      • Avicenna@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        It feels more like he is Netanyahu’s attack dog and some of the tech oligarchs with dad issues treat him like one. The others just lick his ass for free pass to do whatever the fuck they want. Of course you may ask “aren’t these the only modes of friendship that exists in Trump’s life” and you may be right…

  • Nobody@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Even if Trump hadn’t raped children, being the exact opposite of Teddy Roosevelt would make him among the worst American presidents.

    The child-raping thing makes it considerably worse btw.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      and because the base also supports it, because they have rapists in thier ranks, where its only place acceptable.