I believe that’s very regional, if there’s a local hiking club you could try to reach out to them.
There’s often forums dedicated to hiking, which have all sorts of hikes mapped out.
But a map service like mapy.com (formerly .cz), has the official marked routes as part of their mapping data
And best of all, it’s based on an American average
Gravity walking is the missing link, lift your foot and let gravity pull it down. You’ll be going down almost running and it takes barely any energy.
It’s best in places without other humans, as you’re basically a locomotive and it takes time to slow down
Only ISBN’d books, so anything earlier than 1965 is currently not requested by them
Now we just need to proof they’ve copied the files onto a second hard drive, so they own two copies
If we’re gonna keep it as a copyright issue, I think people are mostly mad they’re not able to reprint the books themselves if they wanted to. We’re not speaking from a copyright position
The incentive is literally that it’s cheaper to scan, that’s all.
But given they’re only interested in books with ISBN’s, I recon they’re already scanned and available in digital forms. If they’re newer than the 80s, they’re most likely in a document file in a server related to the publisher.
Honestly surprised they’d rather source physical books, than just request various publishers for a price for their combined works - Only reason I can think of, is the physical scan makes other scans like a mobile photo easier to recognise and respond correctly to
If a big company needed a lot of something specific, they’d probably pay a pretty penny and let people going to small lot auctions accumulate a sizeable amount and then buy it from them.
It’s not impossible to buy stuff from small lots at scale, as long as you’re willing to pay a premium
What a wild ride of a Wikipedia page
They fled to the US for amnesty because they don’t intend to do so, but it would sour the American relationship with the UK even further
They’re way more negative in regards to AI on Lemmy than they are on Reddit
The text doesn’t read buy, it reads transfer. Basically force all AI companies to issue one extra share per share currently held and handed over to the fund.
Assume they could be non voting shares, but have them be paid the same dividends as other shareholders
But I don’t get why this would be preferred to increasing capital tax or company taxes
EU samarbejdet og de frie grænser igennem Schengen komplicere situationen en del. Da vi ser hjemløse i dårligere stillede lande rykker videre til rigere lande, Schengen samarbejdet giver os lov til at sende dem tilbage (3 måneders reglen) - Men det hjælper ikke ligefrem Polakken at vi sender ham tilbage til Warszawa eller Rumæneren til Bukarest.
Det er en udfordring der skal løses på EU niveau. Selvfølgelig skal vi hjælpe alle danske statsborgere i problemer, det er der også mange kommuner der gør. Men mange hjemløse i København er ikke danske statsborgere
There’s a funny thing going on at EU level, were Danish unions are lobbying against an EU wide minimum wage. As they believe un-unionised immigrant labour will end up with worse wages, if there’s a legal minimum wage they can point to
This is more like a competition than anything, GameJams is an integral part of the indie games communities and something a fair share of developers likes doing.
It’s a way to try to come up with new concepts and get feedback on it. Often with one or more constraints/themes from the specific jam you’re participating in
Der er også noget interessant i at bruge gennemsnitstal ved udspurgte enkelt personer.
For lad os antage der er en kurve der hedder,
Så skal menneskerne matches ind i forhold, de 10% der ikke ønsker børn har en okay sandsynlighed for at finde hinanden. Idet mange stiller spørgsmålet, ønsker du børn?, tidligt i udvælgelsesforløbet.
Men det er ikke ofte man spørger, så hvor mange? Så en person der ønsker 4 børn, kan reelt set godt først indse at deres partner kun ønsker et barn når de er forelskede.
Det ville give en bedre ide om hvorvidt det er rammerne der er problemet, hvis de spurgte etablerede parforhold hvad de ønskede sammen - Vil forvente individernes gennemsnit altid vil være højere end par forholdenes gennemsnit
Der var flere på deltidsstillinger dengang og bedsteforældre gik på pension betydeligt tidligere
Hvis jeg havde nogen intention om at få børn, ville jeg gå betydeligt ned i tid når pokémonen kom til verden
Fordi de fleste er gode til at falde for livsstilsinflation, de flest firmaer tillader folk at gå på deltid hvis de ønsker - Det er bare svært hvis man maksede huslånet ud og stadig ønsker at forbruge hele månedslønnen
problem isn’t even the Tesla politics … Most EVs are touted as a luxury ordeal with luxury prices.
That is Tesla politics. Tesla specifically wanted to build a luxury, very complicated machine as their first EV. While Chinese automakers did the opposite, they began small with less complicated machines (hey smaller battery for smaller weight) and then built more complex and luxury models on top of that base
Heck even oil producing European countries such as Scotland and Norway, considers renewable the future
Why would you make it harder than it is?
libre office and you got an open source Office suite