• SeventySeven@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Fuck the DEA and the FDA and any assholes trying to ban kratom (and honestly most drugs for the matter. My body, my choice). I have been successfully using it for pain and anxiety relief for years without any issues, but because of stupid fear mongering and idiots selling it at every gas station, many people’s lives will be ruined if people turn to hard drugs that will actually get you killed if it’s ever banned. I’ll be out of work and never get back on my feet if they ban it… I hate american healthcare so fucking much.

    Sorry if this was a little off-topic I just needed to vent a bit. It just pisses me off and has made me hate the war on drugs even more. It’s all about money and controlling our bodies. If the US government were looking out for your best health interests, they would have made basic fucking healthcare free for their citizens.

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    America: big on winning wars.

    …Lost the war on terror to terror.

    …Lost the war on drugs to drugs.

  • gigastasio@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    We’ve had a sign posted at work saying “We are proud to be a drug-free workplace. All new and current employees are subject to drug testing at any time.”

    Not. Once. Not even when Jimmy came in to work each evening with the smell of weed wafting off of him. I could probably lay rails on my work table right in front of the security camera and hit one each hour and nothing would happen.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Sure, but that’s not what the policies are for. If/when someone gets injured on the job the policy is standardly they require you to take a drug test then. If you fail you were breaking policy and the injury is deemed your fault, thus taking all responsibility of paying you workers comp off the table. Happens every day across the U.S.

      • SpacePanda@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        For weed, get a medical card, if you can afford it. Usually even in recreational states you can get one and then they can’t fire ypu for it.

          • SpacePanda@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Citation? I’m confused, for what? Clearly I’m missing something because 24 people agree with you lol

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Can you provide any citation that a company can’t fire you if you have a medical card? AFAIK that’s not true. As I understand it, It’s still illegal under federal law, and there is no concept of marijuana as medicine in federal law.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          You can have a prescription for opiates too.

          Doesn’t make it OK to be high at a job where that impairment puts you and others in danger.

          That being said, there’s no test for THC that has a narrow enough time window to tell if someone is currently intoxicated. Blood tests are the closest at 6h, but blood levels aren’t correlated with intoxication.

        • QualifiedKitten@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I live in a state with recreational marijuana, but my current employer’s policies specifically prohibit even medical marijuana, and I had to do a pre-employment drug test. Looking for a better job, but I’ve exhausted unemployment and all my savings, so it pays the bills for now.

          • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Is that not protected under anti-disability discrimination legislation in the US?

            I’m on medical cannabis in the UK, while our system is not set up for it at all if an employer took umbrage with it for a non-operational reason (such as operating heavy machinery vs being on it at all) that’d be a fairly open and shut disability discrimination case. Same as if you fired an employee for being on tramadol or similar.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                Yeah, federally it’s classified as “no medicinal benefits with high potential for abuse”, aka schedule 1. This is why I can sue (or even get the government to sue on my behalf) an employer for firing me when my prescribed amphetamines trip a drug test, but the government can mandate employers that work with it to fire anyone who fails a cannabis test regardless of prescription status.

                Biden was in the process of rescheduling cannabis, and honestly I’ve got issues with the whole scheduling system considering that it says cannabis and acid are worse than heroin and forces opiates and adhd meds into the same regulatory box despite abuse of them looking more like proper use of the other.

              • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                Christ, how does that work with your doctors being way more keen to prescribe narcotics than ours then? Is it literally a case of follow your doctor’s orders or your boss’s? That’s fucked up.

                • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Prescribed narcotics would be OK as long as related doctor or company restrictions on operating heavy equipment or such were complied with. But in the US marijuana is still federally illegal. The feds usually don’t seek out prosecutions where states have legalized at the state level, but banks won’t accept business accounts if marijuana is sold because of the federal illegality, and businesses involving heavy machinery generally also still feel the legal risk of explicitly allowing marijuana use is too high.

                • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Side note update for you, thanks to the Sacklers and the hell on earth they visited on us via profiteering lying about the opiates they invented, now there’s actually a gigantic back swing and it’s WAY more difficult to be prescribed strong pain relief, even when badly needed. Count on us to always come up with the worst possible response to a problem, I guess.

      • Impleader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        “Drug-free workplace” policy language is also a requirement for a lot of government contracts in the US

      • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I worked at a factory in the rural south the year (2022) they quietly did away with marijuana testing, even for spot violations. Turns out the standard reasoning, “the insurance company says,” doesn’t really matter… they didn’t care and allowed a 9-panel to be used in all testing matters.

        The unofficial reason I heard is, they go through the same workers on rotation, the good employees get hired back and forth. Drunks are chaotic, tweakers introduce drugs and are chaotic. Stoners are quiet and show up on time, and cause 0% of the fights, and tend to come with less of a rap sheet for terroristic threats and domestics.

        They almost tripped over themselves to look the other way on my stonership…

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah I remember when my factory hired a young woman to head HR shortly after weed was legalized where I lived and she immediately got to ensuring we wouldn’t be punished for smoking. The stoners are rarely a problem, and you really don’t want to lose a bunch of people just because their mild drug of choice is fat soluble instead of water soluble

          It does amuse me how I’ve had doctors and employers drug test me which only pushed me from weed to acid

          • johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Meanwhile I worked at one company in Colorado that didn’t test for marijuana at all when I got hired, I specifically asked. Then 6 months later hired some lady from Utah and they started testing all new employees for marijuana and threatening drug tests whenever something happened. Marijuana having been legal in the state for like 15 years at that point.

  • cloudshouter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Thank white conservatives. No, really. It was maybe twenty years ago we were first hearing about this because so many young white men in conservative areas were doing opioids that the local employers had to give up. Once enough conservative weed smokers were voting, that started to legalize and be commonly used. Drivers for the conservative drug turn includes the war on terror and the failures of the VA, and the war on affordable healthcare and social services. Before that, the war on drugs was on the record as being aimed at Mexicans, blacks, and liberals. Also teenagers, but I don’t recall any federal government politicians saying that one out loud.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    How is it possible that ‘companies can’t find enough workers’ but it takes more applications than ever to find a job? Something doesn’t fucking add up

    • Tiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Well there actually isn’t anyone looking at the applications! That would cost someone $20 a hour!

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      They can’t find enought workers that will accept shit pay and 0 benefits, but they don’t like saying that.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      For us it’s an issue with marketing the position in a manner thay doesn’t result in 5,000 automated applications from an Indian headhunter firm that blindly clicks everything.

      I’ve had a job opening at my city for weeks that pays higher than any other city in the state does for the same position, and we’ve had a grand total of one applicant who wasn’t qualified.

  • myyass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    You know whats funny? When I worked in education, no one cared. I would start my day with some pot after a night of heavy drinking. I bet I smelled like a bottle of vodka. Well I know I did, one day I had to go home cause I was so hung over and no one batted an eye. It didn’t help that the easiest conversation starter in the teachers lounge was what will you be drinking tonight. So yeah most jobs don’t really care.

  • eurodyne@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I am 47, and I have never not once been tested for drugs for work.

    For most of my jobs, I’m relatively certain that drugs were in fact required.

    If anyone tried to test me for drugs, I would tell them to go fuck themselves, and I’d happily walk away from the interview.

      • TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Anytime I have worked for fintech I’ve been tested and fully background checked every time, pretty annoying but the trade off is the pay I suppose

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I work with a vulnerable population. In addition to every job doing piss testing my fingerprints and DNA get recorded and checked against unsolved assaults / murders. Nothing ever comes up but I always worry I’m gonna be like the last person that touched a vase before the dude that bashed somebody’s head in with it and the dude who did it isn’t in any databases and I’m gonna have to answer a bunch of intrusive questions.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        If I wanna buy blow in whatever city I’m visiting, I always ask a bartender or a waiter for a hook up.

        It’s a rule I refer to as “industry standard”

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I have told prosprective employers to fuck off over:

      take a drug test

      Take a psych test

      Unlock my credit for credit checks

      Take a full face scan

      Register with id.me for the application process

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        How does that Nazi dick taste?

        Nobody fucking tells me when I can piss. I and the sole authority over my own bodily functions.

    • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’m 36 and have been drugs tested once. They reckoned they’d seen me drop a gram of coke on camera so I got 6 weeks paid holiday.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Obviously, because nobody oopsie-daisies a gram of coke without going back to grab it, lol.

        • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          😂 I don’t live in the best area and my dog is an early morning boy, I’ve found 3 grams this month. Kinda feel sorry for whoever lost it but I’m also no longer a fan so hopefully that might help someone

          • eurodyne@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            So… Where do you live? Please drop a pin on a map and reply only in a DM.

            I’ll drop by and bring snacks!

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I have been drug tested several times, and I am in fact “on drugs”. So, I get a call within a couple of days of getting tested to provide them with access to my pharmacy records to prove they are legally prescribed.
        So, wtf were they doing that you got 6 weeks?

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Same, and once I even got into a position where I was told I was free to sue a potential employer because they dismissed me without giving an opportunity to present proof of prescription

        • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Apparently it fell out of my pocket on a Monday morning (doubtful but I did head home for the weekend and blacked out a bit so possible…but I would have done the coke if that was the case 😂) got dragged into a meeting on Wednesday, pissed clean and just got told to go home until I heard otherwise.

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Im 46, and I’ve only had one job that didnt do a pre-employment drug test. But most of my jobs have involved machines that can hurt people if not handled right.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’m 46 and my line of work is one of the more dangerous jobs involving heavy equipment. There is always a drug test as a pre employment screening, but that’s basically it. Nobody checks again because they’d have to fire half the workforce.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        There are some jobs for which I can understand when it would be very important to ensure the operators of heavy equipment absolutely must be guaranteed to be sober at all times.

        Beyond heavy machine operators, this also includes livery drivers, airline pilots, etc.

        But those are specialty jobs for which my previous comments are excluded.

        Thank you for doing your job well, and soberly

        • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Don’t forget Healthcare and insurance. I only know insurance because I have an uncle that has said he’d start micro dosing just to help him sleep but that could result in loss of his license

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I’m skeptical that’s what we’re actually testing for, though. Employment drug tests are just to see if they’ll stop doing drugs for a month. We don’t expect heavy machine operators to do a field sobriety test at the start of their shift.

      • chunk6235@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        The only jobs I didn’t get a piss test were all retail/food service. Every professional job I’ve had (tech) has made me drop a UA. I may have had to study to pass the pre-employment test, but thankfully no place I’ve been does randoms.

        As my former manager put it, boss man isn’t going to make us drop a UA cuz he knows he’s lose his whole IT department.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Ok, storytime!

          I worked in a little fabrication shop back in 2013 or so. The general manager got a hair up his ass and decided he was going to drug test everyone.

          We lost everyone on all three shifts except for me, and my supervisor. My supervisor had been picked up a month prior for possession, and was getting regular drug tests from someone else. Im just boring.

          The shop closed down a few months later. They couldn’t get anyone to work there, because people who do that kind of work talk to each other.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      a handful of my jobs they knew i was heavily medicated and were offering me more drugs (part time office work in between surgeries)

    • Devial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I live in Germany, and over here unless your employer can present a damn good safety critical reason for why you must be sober at work (e.g. operating heavy machinery) it’s not even legal to randomly drug test employees.

      For your standard office job, or McDonalds cashier, or even high level office positions it would all be illegal for the employer to (randomly) drug test you.

      As long as you’re not operating dangerous machinery, it’s none of your employers business what you do off the clock at home, even if that’s consuming illegal drugs. They can (obviously) ban you from being high at work, but they would reasonable suspicion to accuse of you violating that, and potentially trigger a test (which means effectively the thing that is banned is for your performance at work to be impaired by drugs. If you work equally well high as sober, and don’t reek of weed when you walk in, you can pretty much just work high without risk of much consequences)

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        All I know about Germany is that, aside from producing the world‘s most AWESOME gay porn, and having some extremely bizarre trash disposal laws, it is an confoundingly boring country.

        But it’s nice to know that, aside from the outrageously restrictive drug laws, they don’t do on the job drug testing.

  • Nautalax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yeah mine is not you can be (and are) randomly pinged at any time to go pee in a cup and blow in a tube because they would really really rather that people not be zonked out on the job and make some horrific decision that could impact safety. Sometimes people fail the random tests and get canned but it’s more common for people coming in to test hot and never get started. Good paying jobs but I guess people figure drugs and/or not having to hold back from alcohol on your duty week are better

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      They still do it in healthcare. I can’t imagine the absolute fiasco that would happen if a doc does a knee replacement on the left knee when they were supposed to do it on the right and turns out he pops positive.

      I also worked in construction for a short time and had a machine operator damage an existing building. He went straight to be tested and I don’t even remember if I saw him onsite again

      • Nautalax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah if there was a major screw-up fitness for duty was one of the first things they did along with taking statements of people who were there

    • shweddy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yea safety, but what the fuck does the things I do in my free time have to do with work? Are the bosses also testing for alcohol and drugs? How do we know they aren’t doing drugs that metabolize faster than can be tested? You want me to not do drugs pay me on my off time as well if not get bent and I won’t work there

      • Nautalax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Power plant can hypothetically shut down for a problem any given moment and need people called in in the dark of night to get it back up ASAP so in this case they were explicitly clear that you do get dragged in at off hours and had better not be imbibing anything that would impair you during your duty week since that’s factored into the job.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I don’t even bother studying for drug tests anymore. If they care about weed and mushrooms then I’ll work elsewhere.

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m a medical provider at a university hospital. They have a drug testing policy, but they have only ever utilized it for staff, not faculty members. I’ve worked in my clinic for more than ten years and have never been drug tested.

    Pretty sure the hospital administrators really don’t want to know if any of their physicians have any bad habits. It’s kinda a lose lose situation for the hospital, and it’s pretty well known that our field has substance abuse issues.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Health care should be one of the top 3 places to test. But having worked in healthcare for 20+ years a doctor could come in for the drug test, do a rail in front of the tester, make the hold the cup while they piss all over the place and walk out smiling, and admin would think nothing less of it

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah… Unfortunately, as long as you still have the ability to bill Medicare under your NPI you really have to work to get dismissed from a hospital.

        The head of my department is currently being sued by the advertising and media department for making his own commercial. The advertising department made a commercial that didn’t feature him as much as he thought it should so he just made and aired his own commercial featuring official branding of the university and hospital.

        He had to take down the commercial, but he continues to print off shirts for everyone in our department about the commercial. The administration’s stance on the whole thing was just to let the two departments work it out.