• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you’d told any American 40 years ago that Mexico’s democracy in 2026 would make Americas look pathetic, they’d have called you crazy and then beaten you up. Not so much anymore.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I voted her for this kind of policies, but reality is not that simple. Public healthcare costs a lot of money, and current facilities and personnel are in the stone age. I wouldn’t go to any public healthcare facility right now as my first choice. At least not where I live. Sustained investment and vigilance are key, and I hope that by the end of her mandate we will have something we could call a proper public healthcare system, not yet a decent one, but an existing one.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Still something better than the US, where some wait (or are poor so they just need to go to the ER) until the ER when it’s too late. The only prevention is those with regular insurance and use it.

      • DonGirses@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mexicano Tijuanense aquí, I concur

        Although the voter ID registration for existing and new phone numbers is dumb as shit. Complete erosion of privacy.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This kinda thing doesn’t turn on over night. You might be able to afford private, but very few will be able to. The American paid system has a 3-9 month wait for doctor visits right now in Tucson. My doctor also doesn’t even physically examine me anymore because they’re so rushed to get in other patients, because capitalism.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m okay with both opinions of capitalism as evil or not. The American healthcare system is, sorry, it is dogshit. No one should be living under that system, it’s only better than nothing at all, I guess.

        • Horsey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          As a Canadian living in the southwestern US because I physically cannot handle the cold, the healthcare here is worse than dog shit.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        True. But it only matters if you are alive. Look, I’m not trying to be cynical, we have both systems in Mexico, and I’ve experienced both as a client. I’m all for public healthcare, but if it doesn’t work, it’s only a pretty idea. On the private side, yeah it’s fucking expensive, but it kind of works for the ones who can afford it. Just to be clear, we agree.

      • rjmalagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Dr .Simi login… (Very cheap Mexican drugstore chain, med labs and MDs consultation, even veterinary services on some cities)

  • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yay! Also Mexico got free healthcare before the U.S.A. and North Korea may get a female leader before the U.S.A. gets a female president. Truly 'murica

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    How will this impact the medical tourism industry that Americans depend on for affordable healthcare?

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’ll probably stay the same. This administration is very aware of these issues and I doubt they’ll intervene. Private practice is already available to anyone who wants it, no questions asked.

      Source: am Mexican living in Mexico

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s one of the things uasians don’t understand. Universal health care doesn’t mean there are no private hospitals or practices. It means you have a choice, but you are covered no matter what.

    • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Don’t worry americans don’t use public healthcare in Mexico, otherwise they would actually understand the struggle to get it

      They just use private healthcare since it is catered to them while being cheaper compared to the US (I worked on medical tourism, all the marketing for these clinics is targeted to americans; most of them don’t even bother using Spanish on their ads)

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m sure it will persist, as it primarily services Americans. And their money is still good.

        If anything, we’ll see the Mexican health care system expand in order to absorb all the domestic residents who can now afford the same care

    • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m sure you need to be a Mexican citizen to qualify for the program, I imagine foreigners get a bill. But I’m an American that expects a crippling bill from medical care so I have a bias.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We have free at point of service health care in Canada for those signed up to the plan. You don’t have to be a citizen just a resident and wait your 2 month grace period. For tourists and non signed up folks you pay the costs out of pocket, but they are reasonable compared to USA. A coworker wasn’t here long enough for the signup and dislocated his shoulder. Hospital visit, xray, sling, etc $400

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        In some countries they don’t even have the financial infrastructure to bill patients, so injured tourists get free health care. A big chunk of American medical bills is due to the cost of billing.

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          In some countries they don’t even have the financial infrastructure to bill patients,

          That’s a bit fat-fetched…

          • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I never went to surgery or anything, but I’ve been to a couple of Drs in Mexico and it’s basically just like paying the copay and just peacing out. Most of the time you can just ask the pharmacist and they prescribe whatever right there.

            You’re overestimating the American Healthcare system.

          • FrederikNJS@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The ones i know: Denmark, England, Sweden, Norway

            But I would imagine that most other countries with unified tax paid healthcare would be the same.

            • Rothe@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              In Denmark (and I would assume those other countries as well) it varies depending on the factors. If you are a foreigner but are living in Denmark, or if you are staying in Denmark for a job, then you can apply for the rights of free healthcare treatment, but if you are a tourist needing urgent care, and are not a citizen of the EU (or the Nordic countries), or under the age of 18, then you will be billed.

              So there definitely is a financial infrastructure to bill in Denmark, even though its own citizens never see it. Without knowing it precisely I would also assume that the bill would be very reasonable compared to a bill for the same treatment in the US.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s almost like there is an exceptional amount of things happening right now in the world. We all have our own local issues and sometimes it takes a minute to catch up on what happened else where.

      I’m just learning about it. I don’t care that 2 months have passed. It’s very uplifting and would be even if I already knew about it.

      What the hell is your problem with it not being new enough? Why are you gate keeping here?

      Please stop being a nuisance. If you have a legitimate concern about this then just come out and say it. Stop being an asshole.

      And remember the old saying, if you don’t have anything nice to say, shut the fuck up and mind your own business. This isn’t hurting ANYONE to be reminded of it, and if someone, such as myself, is learning about it for the first time why are you trying to take that away from me. Today I’m one of the 10,000. Perhaps tomorrow you will be.

      Better late than never.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are so many health services that can be delivered en masse at very little cost. I once lived in a “3rd world” country with state sponsored healthcare. They had an army of nurses in shop storefronts delivering vaccines and basic meds for common illnesses. Just walk in. Nothing fancy - one of them literally reused hypodermic needles after sterilizing them with a bunsen burner. But how fancy does it actually need to be?

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s a thing in the US too, by the way. You can walk into a pharmacy or some grocery stores and get cheap/free vaccines for the current flu strain as well as the standard immunizations for a bunch of common diseases.

        Most people don’t take advantage of it.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s unfortunate that vaccinations somehow became political because it’s a great example of public health efforts for all being cheap with huge benefits

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          True that’s how I get my flu shots and such. It’s often extremely modest accommodations. Once my feet were resting on a pile of discarded coat hangers and other detritus from the drugstore’s retail floor.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree, as a Canadian even if not perfect I couldn’t imagine having a pay system or even what the US calls healthcare. That’s the point of taxation, we get roads that are drivable, healthcare that is affordable and stuff like food standards, clean drinking water, education. The billionaires are trying to say everyone else doesn’t need such things so they can get a bigger nibble of the pie when they already have truckloads.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Free as in “free at the point of service”.
      Of course it is paid for somehow.
      But as far a a someone going into a hospital to get a cast, medicine, birth… It’s free

      • Zachariah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s true. Unfortunately, calling it free is often used by people who want to paint it as infeasible, and is used as an excuse to cut funding—even when data shows it’s an investment with human and monetary rewards.

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I like to compare it to someone sitting in math class, the lesson is on square numbers and they go “a square is a shape though”. Everyone who actually paid attention knows the relation between the concepts and doesn’t need to compensate ignorance with smug pedantry.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            You get free police beatings. And if you’re stopped they will empty the money out of your wallet as “civil asset forfeiture”. So not exactly a cost but not exactly free.

        • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          As far as everyone except oligarchs are concerned, it means everyone can access it without getting financially fucked over into debt. And that’s excellent news.

          • flandish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            incorrect slightly- while most boomer and right wing assholes know it means free at point of service and tax funded they act like it means “free for welfare queens and illegals” because they think daddy capitalist is watching them lick boots.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Conservative America is driven so hard by the fear of somebody poorer darker skinned than you getting something you’re not.

            • story@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              it’s both, not one or the other. race is a component of class society but does not predate it and will never supplant it

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes I mean nothing is free if we try to be strict about it. The word would have no meaning. I think we all understand “sold at zero price” but there are always people in the crowd who want to pop up and say “it’s not free! someone pays!” Typically their next move is to start breaking down who pays and why it’s unfair. I have no patience for them.

        • huppakee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I dont have patience for those people either, but in general a lot of people feel taxes are the state taking away money. Where i live this is true for large corpo’s and rich folk (‘the state should not waste money on things people can pay for by themselves’ is how they tend to put it here), but also by people with low wages tend to complain about how the state robs them. Reminding them how things they use are funded by the taxes they pay (roads, hospitals, police, education) can help them; because here they tend to fall for the retoric of the parties serving the rich and they sometimes truly believe the country would be nicer if they paid less taxes (not understanding they would have much more trouble paying for things like education and healthcare). For that reason I much prefer ‘tax-funded healthcare/public transport/education’, as calling it free is like giving a weapon to the group of people and corporations trying to lower their tax burden (and getting out of their responsibilities as the heavy lifters of funding public services).

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Even setting aside the deceptive propaganda around this, “they” meaning right wing voters of modest means, still have two problems with tax funded services of any kind. The government may not be “taking money away” as in making it vanish, but they are taking away the choice of how that money should be spent. Conservatives see a moral hazard here where their taxes will pay for the poor lifestyle choices of others - and actually they are right, just not the way they think they are. It’s not abortions for slutty brown women they should worry about but metabolic syndrome brought on by their own white neighbors horrible diets that will burden the system most.

            Their other problem is they don’t want to benefit from this kind of public good themselves. They see it as “taking charity” and although white people accept plenty of advantages, they like to stay proud about it. It doesn’t help to say “look, you’re getting something here.” So there just isn’t any way of making them comfortable with the setup, even when it isn’t being grossly distorted to them.

            The whole “I don’t take no charity” is a very old American value and part of a complex system we have for giving people ways to feel superior to others. We don’t have a formal class system in this society but we service the same instincts in a hundred other small ways. Farm subsidies? Of course! Do you know how important farmers are? Healthcare supports? What… so I can pay for abortions for some illegal immigrant who couldn’t keep her legs closed?

            We’re terminally stupid here and everything is about feels I don’t see how we’ll ever get past all this.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Conservatives see a moral hazard here where their taxes will pay for the poor lifestyle choices of others

              I see a moral choice where my taxes will pay for the poor political choices of conservatives in poorer red states, but they also deserve free healthcare

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is “free as in beer” and “free as in speech” — this is “free as in theme park rides.”

      You already paid.

    • Aniki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      also money is fictional so i consider it “free” if it helps the people actually.